Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:49:54.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L. P. Krysin and D. N. Shmelev (eds.), Social'no-lingvisticheskie issledovanija. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR, Institut russkogo jazyka, Izd. Nauka, 1976. - J. D. Desheriev, Social'naja lingvistika. Moscow: AN SSSR, Institut jazykoznanija, Izd. Nauka, 1977.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jules F. Levin
Jules F. Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Literatures and languages, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1981 , pp. 85 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barinova, G. A.; Il'ina, N. E.; & Kuz'mina, S. M. (1971). O tom, kak proverjalsja voprosnik po proiznosheniju. In Vysotskij, S. S. et al. (eds.), Razvitie fonetiki sovremennogo russkogo jazyka: Fonologicheskie podsistemy. Moscow: Nauka. 315–42.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1969). Sociolinguistics. In Berkowitz, L. (ed), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krysin, L. P. (1974). Russkij jazyk po dannym massovogo obstedovanija. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Pap, M., & Pléh, C. (1972a). A szocialis helyzet és a beszéd összefüggesei az iskoláskor kezdetén. Valóság 15: 2.Google Scholar
Pap, M., & Pléh, C. (1972b). Nyelvhasználat és társadalmi helyzet. Szociólógia 1: 2.Google Scholar