Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:48:37.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Middle class timelines: Ethnic humor and sexual modernity in Delhi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2019

Kira Hall*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Kira Hall, Department of Linguistics, 295 UCB, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0295, USAkira.hall@colorado.edu

Abstract

The rise of India's global economy has reinforced a perception of English as a language of sexual modernity within the expanding middle classes. This article explores this perception in the multilingual humor of Hindi-speaking Delhi youth marginalized for sexual and gender difference. Their joking routines feature the Sikh Sardarji, a longstanding ethnic figure often caricatured as circulating in modernity but lacking the English competence to understand modernity's semiotics. Reflective of the economic restructuring that ushered in the millennium, the humor supports a normative progress narrative that prioritizes an ethnically unmarked urban middle class. At the same time, the lesbian, bisexual, and transgender youth who tell these jokes—still criminalized under Section 377 when this fieldwork was conducted—shift this narrative by positioning sexual knowledge at modernity's forefront. The analysis reveals how sexual modernity—here viewed as constituted in everyday interaction through competing configurations of place, time, and personhood—relies on normativity even while defining itself against it. (Chronotope, ethnic humor, formulaic jokes, globalization, Hindi-English, Hinglish, media, middle class, normativity, sexual modernity, temporality)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank India's brilliant, generous, and pathbreaking LGBT activist Betu Singh (1964–2013) and her welcoming circle of Delhi friends, especially Cath, Maya, and Sujata. This article benefitted from discussions with graduate students in my 2017 and 2019 CU Boulder seminars as well as audiences at BLS 40, LISO 2013, LLL 20, Queen Mary University of London, Syracuse University, and University of Bern. Deep thanks go to Language in Society editor Jenny Cheshire, the anonymous reviewers, editors Molly Mullin and Audra Starcheus, and many others for their important insights, including Tarren Andrews, Marcus Avelar, Rusty Barrett, Mary Bucholtz, Jillian Cavanaugh, Cynthia Gordon, Leanne Hinton, Olivia Hirschey Marrese, Velda Khoo, Maureen Kosse, Bill Leap, Erez Levon, Tommaso Milani, Bhuvana Narasimhan, Sabina Perrino, Ben Rampton, Sasha Romanova, Devyani Sharma, Muhammad Sheeraz, Kahlil B. Thomas, Crispin Thurlow, Andrew Ting, and especially Donna Goldstein.

References

REFERENCES

Agha, Asif (2007). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication 27(3):320–35.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2011). Large and small scale forms of personhood. Language & Communication 31:171–80.Google Scholar
Alternative Law Forum (2009). The right that dares to speak its name. Bangalore: Alternative Law Forum. Online: http://altlawforum.org/publications/the-right-that-dares-to-speak-its-name/.Google Scholar
Baerenholdt, Jørgen Ole; Haldrup, Michael; Larsen, Jonas; & Urry, John (2004). Performing tourist places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In Holquist, Michael (ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays, 84258. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Trans. by Iswolsky, Helene. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty (2020). Trash: Language, sexuality, and social class. In Hall, Kira & Barrett, Rusty (eds.), Oxford handbook of language and sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (2003). Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko (2011). On the edge of the global: Modern anxieties in a Pacific Island nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Saga.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2(2):115–30.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language and society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44:105–16.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom (2011). But do not identify as gay: A proleptic genealogy of the MSM category. Cultural Anthropology 26(2):287312.Google Scholar
Bose, Brinda (2000). The desiring subject: Female pleasures and feminist resistance in Deepa Mehta's Fire. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 7(2):249–62.Google Scholar
Bose, Soumittra S. (2009a). Same sex wedding jolts village. The Times of India. June 12.Google Scholar
Bose, Soumittra S. (2009b). Villagers dumbstruck at girls’ arrogant act. Times City (Delhi edition), The Times of India.Google Scholar
Bose, Soumittra S. (2009c). ‘Daredevil’ couple defied relatives. Times City (Delhi edition), The Times of India.Google Scholar
Bose, Soumittra S. (2009d). ‘Married’ girls ready to die but not part. The Times of India. June 12.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brosius, Christiane (2010). India's middle class: New forms of urban leisure, consumption, and prosperity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2011). White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2008). All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):401–31.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary; Skapoulli, Elena; Barnwell, Brendan; & Janie Lee, Jung-Eun (2011). Entextualized humor in the formation of scientist identities among US undergraduates. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 42(3):177–92.Google Scholar
Carr, E. Summerson, & Lempert, Michael (2016). Introduction: Pragmatics of scale. In Carr, E. Summerson & Lempert, Michael (eds.), Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life, 124. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha (1989). The nationalist resolution of the women's question. In Sangari, Kumkum & Vaid, Sudesh (eds.), Recasting women: Essays in colonial history, 233–53. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Das, Sonia N. (2016). Linguistic rivalries: Tamil migrants and Anglo-Franco conflicts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dave, Nasargi N. (2012). Queer activism in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Deanna (2007). East spaces in West times. Language & Communication 27(3):212–26.Google Scholar
Davies, Christie (1990). Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna, & Perrino, Sabina (eds.) (2019). Special issue on ‘Chronotopes and chronotopic relations’. Language & Communication, to appear.Google Scholar
de Koning, Anouk, & Vollebergh, Anick (2019). Ordinary icons: Public discourses and everyday lives in an anxious Europe. American Anthropologist 121(2):390402.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.Google Scholar
Eisenlohr, Patrick (2006). Little India: Diaspora, time, and ethnolinguistic belonging in Hindu Mauritius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Leela (2004). The politics of forgetting: Class politics, state power, and the restructuring of urban space in India. Urban Studies 41(12):2415–30.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1984). What is enlightenment? In Rabinow, Paul (ed.), The Foucault reader, 3250. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, Elizabeth (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (2016). Scale-making: Comparison and perspective as ideological projects. In Carr, E. Summerson & Lempert, Michael (eds.), Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life, 91111. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Shohini (2010). Fire: A queer film classic. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1991). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Donna (2003/2013). Laughter out of place: Race, class, violence, and sexuality in a Rio shantytown. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Donna, & Hall, Kira (2017). Postelection surrealism and nostalgic racism in the hands of Donald Trump. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(4):397406.Google Scholar
Gopinath, Gayatri (1998). On fire. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 4:631–36.Google Scholar
Gupta, Charu (2001). Sexuality, obscenity, community: Women, Muslims, and the Hindu public in colonial India. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Jack, Halberstam (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (1997). ‘Go suck your husband's sugarcane!’ Hijras and the use of sexual insult. In Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira (eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality, 430–60. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2005). Intertextual sexuality: Parodies of class, identity, and desire in liminal Delhi. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):125–44.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2009). Boys’ talk: Hindi, moustaches, and masculinity in New Delhi. In Pichler, Pia & Eppler, Eva (eds.), Gender and spoken interaction, 139–62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2011). The new behan chod: High-tech cursing in India's globalized economy. American Anthropological Association Meeting, Montreal.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2013). ‘It's a hijra!’ Queer linguistics revisited. Discourse & Society 24(5):634–42.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2014). Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24(2):259–70.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira; Goldstein, Donna M.; & Ingram, Matthew Bruce (2016). The hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, gesture, spectacle. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(2):71100.Google Scholar
Handoo, Jawaharlal (1990). Folk narrative and ethnic identity: The ‘Sardarji’ joke cycle. In Röhrich, Lutz & Wienker-Piepho, Sabine (eds.), Storytelling in contemporary societies, 155–61. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, & Ranger, Terence (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Dorothy L. (2001). Introduction: Of modernity/modernities, gender, and ethnography. In Hodgson, Dorothy L. (ed.), Gendered modernities: Ethnographic perspectives, 123. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, John B. & Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269–93. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako (2002). Gender, language, and modernity: Toward an effective history of Japanese women's language. American Ethnologist 29(2):392422.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (2004). Say when: Temporalities in language ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1):99109.Google Scholar
Iyer, Malathy (2014). Homosexuality is unnatural, leading psychiatrist says. January 21. Online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Homosexuality-is-unnatural-leading-psychiatrist-says/articleshow/29126819.cms.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 328. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Lucy (2016). If a Muslim says ‘homo’, nothing gets done: Racist discourse and in-group identity construction in an LGBT youth group. Language in Society 45:113–33.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ratna (2000). Too hot to handle: The cultural politics of Fire. Feminist Review 64:5364.Google Scholar
Kaur, Ish Amitoj (director) (2006). Kambdi Kalaai [motion picture]. United States: Noor Nissan Films.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rita, & Snell, Rupert (2011). Chutnefying English: The phenomenon of Hinglish. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
Koven, Michele (2013). Antiracist, modern selves, and racist, unmodern others: Chronotopes of modernity in Luso-descendeants’ race talk. Language & Communication 33:544–58.Google Scholar
Krikmann, Arvo (2006). Contemporary linguistic theories of humour. Folklore 33:2758.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sarah (2018). Being single in India: Gendered identities, class mobilities, and personhoods in flux. Ethos 46(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12193.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. (2017). Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore's Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3):420–41.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael, & Perrino, Sabina (eds.) (2007a). Temporalities in text. Special issue of Language & Communication 27(3):205336.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael, & Perrino, Sabina (2007b). Entexualization and the ends of temporality. Language & Communication 27(3):205–11.Google Scholar
Löfgren, Orvar (1999). On holiday: A history of vacationing. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mani, Lata (1998). Contentious traditions: The debate on sati in colonial India. In Sangari, Kumkum & Vaid, Sudesh (eds.), Recasting women: Essays in colonial history, 88126. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, Janet (2010). Mobile phones and Mipoho's prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language. American Ethnologist 37(2):337–53.Google Scholar
Mehta, Deepa (director) (1996). Fire [motion picture]. India: Kaleidoscope Entertainment .Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso (2014). Sexed signs—queering the scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 228:201–25.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso, & Levon, Erez (2016). Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication 51:6986.Google Scholar
Mooney, Nicola (2011). Rural nostalgias and transnational dreams: Identity and modernity among Jat Sikhs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nagar, Ila, & DasGupta, Debanuj (2015). Public koti and private love: Section 377, religion, perversity, and lived desire. Contemporary South Asia 23(4):426–41.Google Scholar
Nakassis, Constantine V. (2016). Doing style: Youth and mass mediation in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Narrain, Arvind, & Eldridge, Marcus (2009). Naz Foundation v. Union of India and Others: Decriminalising sexual orientation and gender identity in India. Bangalore: Alternative Law Forum.Google Scholar
Nava Bharat (2009). 2 laṛkiyõ kī āpas mẽ śādī [2 girls marry each other]. June 10, Nagpur.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Ashling (2007). Sikhs fail to see funny side of phone jokes. Times Online, December 4. Online: http://archive.li/kKlrf.Google Scholar
Parshad, Rana D.; Bhowmick, Suman; Chand, Vineeta; Kumari, Nitu; & Sinha, Neha (2016). What is India speaking? Exploring the ‘Hinglish’ invasion. Physica A 449:375–89.Google Scholar
Puri, Jyoti (1999). Woman, body, desire in post-colonial India: Narratives of gender and sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Puri, Jyoti (2016). Sexual states: Governance and the struggle over the antisodomy law in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin (2005). ‘How many lesbians does it take…Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(2):239–57.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, Angela (2017). Ontology of fake: Discerning the Philippine elite. Signs and Society 5(S1):S10027.Google Scholar
Roy, Anjali Gera (2010). Bhangra moves: From Ludhiana to London and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roy, Anjali Gera (2013). The politics of Hinglish. In Wee, Lionel, Robbie, B. H. Goh, & Lim, Lisa (eds.), The politics of English: South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Asia Pacific, 2136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roy, Anjali Gera (2016). Becoming men in the global village: Young Sikhs reenacting Bhangra masculinities. In Jacobsen, Knut A. & Myrvold, Kristina (eds.), Young Sikhs in a global world: Negotiating traditions, identities, and authorities, 167–90. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Andrew (2016). Profane relations: The irony of offensive jokes in India. History and Anthropology 27(3):296312.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Tanika (2003). Hindu wife, Hindu nation: Community, religion, and cultural nationalism. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Souman (2004). Khasi-Jaintia folklore: Context, discourse, and history. Chennai: National Folklore Support Centre.Google Scholar
Shankar, Shalani (2008). Speaking like a model minority: ‘FOB’ styles, gender, and racial meanings among desi teens in Silicon Valley. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 18(2):268–89.Google Scholar
Sheikh, Danish (2013). The road to decriminalization: Litigating India's anti-sodomy law. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 16:104–32.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193229.Google Scholar
Singh, Khushwant (1987–2012). Khushwant Singh's joke book, vols. 1–9. Delhi: Orient Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Spitulnik, Debra A. (2002). Accessing ‘local’ modernities: Reflections on the place of linguistic evidence in ethnography. In Bruce, M. Knauft (ed.), Critically modern: Alternatives, alterities, anthropologies, 194219. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Sanjay (2007). Passionate modernity: Sexuality, class, and consumption in India. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter, & White, Allon (1986). The politics and poetics of transgression. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Bjorn (2012). Anthropology and its many modernities: When concepts matter. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18:160–78.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, & Jaworski, Adam (2010). Tourism discourse: Language and global mobility. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Tripathi, Shailaja (2009). Together forever. The Hindu. July 6.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn, & Wilson, Elizabeth A. (2015). Introduction: Antinormativity's queer conventions. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1):125.Google Scholar
Wirtz, Kristina (2016). The living, the dead, and the immanent: Dialogue across chronotopes. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1):343–69.Google Scholar
Women in love: To hell and back in 15 days. (2009). Times of India. June 28.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn (2012). Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(2):210–24.Google Scholar
Yadav, Leena (director) (2005). Shabd [motion picture]. India: Pritish Nandy Communications.Google Scholar