Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:13:57.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Naming fish: A problem exploration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Björn H. Jernudd
Affiliation:
Institute of Culture and CommunicationEast-West Center
Elizabeth Thuan
Affiliation:
Institute of Culture and CommunicationEast-West Center

Abstract

There is a lack of perception of the interrelatedness of the three fish-naming systems: the scientific, the common, and the folk naming systems. Ichthyologists and regulators of fish names do not sufficiently appreciate the motivations and intricacies of folk naming systems or problems of professional and commercial use of names. At the common name level, there seems to be little exchange of information concerning problems and solutions, objectives, and procedures. Also, communities and networks that use the same language(s) seek different solutions to the same or equivalent naming problems. The authors list some common problems and offer a tentative classification. (Taxonomy, naming, language planning, fisheries)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Fisheries Society (1970). A list of common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Bailey, R. M.. ed. AFS Special Publication No. 6. 3rd edition.Google Scholar
Coffey, B. T. (ed. ) (1978). The American fisheries directory and reference book.Camden. M.E.: National Fisherman.Google Scholar
FAO (1980). FAQ species cataloue. Vol. 1 – Shrimps and prawns of the world: An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. Prepared by Holthuis, L. B.. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
FAO (1978). FAQ species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Central Atlantic (Fishing Area 31) Fischer, W.. ed. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. F. (1972). An evaluation of the effects of nomenclature procedures for fish or fishery products on the industry and on consumers. Unedited, unpublished report prepared for the National Marine Fisheries Service. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. U.S. Department of Commerce. under Contract No. N–043–44–72.Google Scholar
Gosline, W. A., & Brock, V. E. (1960). Handbook of Hawaiian fishes. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J., Klawe, W. L., & Murphy, P. (1979). (2nd ed., 1980.) Tuna and billfish – Fish without a country. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (c/o Scripps Institution of Oceanography). La Jolla, Cal.Google Scholar
Klawe, W. L. (1977). What is a tuna? Marine Fisheries Review 39(11): 15.Google Scholar
Klawe, W. L. (1978). World catches of tuna and tuna-like fishes in 1975. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. Internal Report 11.Google Scholar
Krommer-Benz, M. (1977). World guide to terminological activities. (Infoterm Series 4). Münehen: Verlag Dokumentation.Google Scholar
Royce, W. (1972). Introduction to the fisheries sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (n.d.). Changes to nomenclature of commercial fish species. Department of Primary Industry. Fisheries Division. Canberra. Unpublished report. Mimeographed.Systematic Zoology. Periodical published by the Society of Systematic Zoology.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health. Education, and Welfare (1979). Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended. Food and Drug Administration. Public Health Service. (FDA) 791051.Google Scholar