Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:36:35.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On questions following questions in service encounters1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Marilyn Merritt
Marilyn Merritt
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is a treatment of some patterns of talk that occur in service encounters (and presumably in other conversations as well). It is an attempt to examine the contribution of discourse structures such as the question–answer adjacency pair to the coherence of everyday discourse. The customer-request–server-response sequence is examined as to its adherence to a pattern of question–answer. Though some sequences do adhere to the question–answer pattern, there are many that do not, but rather are manifested as question–question. The question–question patterns are shown to be of several kinds in terms of the relationship of the second question to the first. The analysis demonstrates the relationship of these patterns to the pragmatic interpretation of the customer-request as either a request for information or as a request for service, and leads to a tentative set of generalizations concerning the interpretation of responses to questions in general. (Questions, conversational analysis, discourse analysis, pragmatics, indirect speech acts, coherence, ritual, service encounters, American English.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 315 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bellert, Irena (1970). On a condition of the coherence of texts. Semiotica II. 335–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight (1957). Interrogative structures of American English: the direct question. University, Alabama: Published for the American Dialect Society by University of Alabama Press, No. 28.Google Scholar
Bransford, John D., Barclay, J.Richard & Franks, Jeffery J. (1972). Sentence memory: a constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology 3. 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Starkey Jr (1974). On the structure of speaker—auditor interaction. LinS 3. 161–180.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1973). ‘May we come in?’. Semiotica IX. 97–116.Google Scholar
Garner, Richard (1971). ‘Presupposition’ in philosophy and linguistics. In Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc. 22–42.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1967). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Erving Goffman, Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, N.J.: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co. 5–46.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: microstudies of the public order New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974 a). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974 b). Replies and responses. Paper presented at NWAVE III, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., October 1974, Proceedings forthcoming. Currently available from Università di Urbino, Italia: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistics Working Papers and Prepublications, numbers 46–7, series C, Sept.–Oct. 1975.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975 (1967)). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58. Excerpted from H. Paul Grice's William James Lectures, delivered at Harvard University in 1967 and to be published by Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gunter, Richard (1963). Elliptical sentences in American English. Lingua 12. 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Also reprinted in Gunter, Richard (1974), Sentences in dialog, Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press. 7–21.Google Scholar
Gunter, Richard (1974). Sentences in dialog. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1967 (1964) ). The linguistic study of literary texts. In Chatman, S. and Levin, S. (eds.), Essays on the language of literature.Google Scholar
Reprinted with revision from Lunt, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, Mouton & Co., The Hague.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. (1963 (1957)). Discourse analysis reprints. The Hague: Mouton & C. Reissued from early numbers of the Transformations and Discourse Analysis Papers (TDAP), mimeographed series of the Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Pennsylvania, and of the National Science Foundation project in linguistic transformations.Google Scholar
Hiz, Henry (1962). Questions and answers. The Journal of Philosophy LIX. 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzman, Mathilda (1971). Ellipsis in discourse: implications for linguistic analysis by computer, the child's acquisition of language, and semantic theory. Language and Speech 14. 86–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press. 294–338.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. (1971). Two kinds of presupposition in natural language. In Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 44–52.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1970 a). The study of non-standard English. Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1970 b) The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23. 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Rules for ritual insults. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press. (120–169).Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua, Waletzsky (1966). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Distributed by the Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle. 12–44.Google Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn (1968). On the service encounter. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn (1976). Resources for saying in service encounters. Unpublished dissertation manuscript, Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mishler, Elliot G. (1975). Studies in dialogue and discourse; an exponential law of successive questioning. LinS 4, 31–51.Google Scholar
Moerman, Michael (1973). The use of precedent in natural conversation. Semiotica IX. 193–218.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1972 a). Lecture Notes, mimeographed. Division of Social Sciences, Univ. of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1972 b). On the analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 325–45.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey Schegloff E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C. (1975). The role of memory in language processing. Presented at the 1975 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. To appear in The Nature of Human Memory, ed. by Cofer, C. & Atkinson, R.. W. H. Freeman Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1972 (1968)). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 346–80. Reprinted from the American Ani1ropologist 70. 6.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press. 75–119.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII. 289–327.Google Scholar
Schenkein, James N. (1972). Towards an analysis of natural conversation and the sense of heheh. Semiotica VI. 344–77.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1974). Handwork as ceremony: the case of the handshake. Semiotica XII. 189–202.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 59–82.Google Scholar
Shopen, Tim (1972) A Generative Theory of Ellipsis: a consideration of the linguistic use of silence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Linguistics, U.C.L.A. Reproduced by the Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club, 01 1972.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David (ed.) (1972). Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar