Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:05:42.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the telephone again! Differences in telephone behaviour: England versus Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Maria Sifianou
Maria Sifianou
Affiliation:
Department of English Studies, University of Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates differences in telephone behaviour in England and Greece in the light of Brown and Levinson's model of interaction. It focusses upon differences both in verbal telephone call behaviour and in the attitudes and values attached to telephone usage. Explanations are placed within a broad framework of cultural differences in the preferred interactional strategies of the two societies. (Sociolinguistics, culturally determined variations in telephone behaviour, politeness phenomena, Greece versus England)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 527 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Androulakis, A., & lonnatou-Yannatou, M. (1988). Openings and closings of telephone conversations in Greek. Unpublished manuscript. University of Athens, Department of English Studies.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 56–289.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Ford, M. (1964). Address in American English. In Hymes, D. H. (ed.), Language in culture and society. New York: Harper & Row. 234–44.Google Scholar
Chaika, E. (1982). Language: The social mirror. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1981). Culture and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 5:61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, W. (1984). Language and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Fielding, G. & Hartley, P. (1987). The telephone: A neglected medium. In Cashdam, A. & Jordin, M. (eds.), Studies in communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 110–24.Google Scholar
Godard, D. (1977). Same setting, different norms: Phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society 6:209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, J. (1987). Coping with England. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, R. M. (1984). Truth and politeness: A study in the pragmatics of Egyptian Arabic conversation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1986). Discourse: Scope without depth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57:49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackridge, P. (1985). The modern Greek language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S. (1987). Semantic and pragmatic parameters of meaning: On the interface between contrastive text analysis and the production of translated texts. Journal of Pragmatics 11:721–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. ([1968] 1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. H. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 346–80.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In Psathas, G. (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington. 23–78.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1987). Politeness markers in Greek and in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1980). Implications of the oral/literate continuum for cross-cultural communication. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.), Current issues in bilingual education. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 326–47.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1984). Cross-cultural communication. CATESOL Occasional Papers 10:1–16.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In Olson, D. R., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (eds.), Literacy, language and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 124–47.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vassiliou, V., Triandis, H. C., Vassiliou, G., & McGuire, H. (1972). Interpersonal contact and stereotyping. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley. 89–115.Google Scholar
Venardou, A. (1988). Conventions used in the openings of telephone conversations in Greek. Unpublished manuscript. University of Athens, Department of English Studies.Google Scholar