Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:08:20.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ostensible invitations1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Ellen A. Isaacs  and
Herbert H. Clark
Ellen A. Isaacs
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Stanford University
Herbert H. Clark
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People sometimes extend invitations they don't intend to be taken seriously. We call these ostensible invitations. From a collection of spontaneous examples, we argue that they require: a pretense of sincerity by the speaker; mutual recognition of the pretense by speaker and addressee; collusion on the pretense by the addressee; ambivalence by the speaker about its acceptance; and an off-record purpose by the speaker. We describe seven techniques speakers use in fulfilling these requirements. We also show that speakers try to achieve their off-record purpose by getting addressees to recognize the expectable effects of the invitation, the situation, and the fact that they chose to extend an ostensible invitation. Finally, we argue that ostensible invitations are part of a class of ostensible speech acts, and these in turn are related to other types of nonserious language use. (Speech acts, pragmatics, off record, pretense, nonserious language use)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 493 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1984). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 56–311.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113:121–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, S. (1979). Perlocutions. Linguistics and Philosophy 3:225–243.Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25:219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1965). A dictionary of modern English usage. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1978). Some further notes on logic and conversation. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic. 113–127.Google Scholar
Hjelmquist, E., & Gidlund, A. (1985). Free recall of conversation. Text 5:169–85.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:322–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone bas to lie. In Sanches, M. & Blount, B. (eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic. 57–80.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.). Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Seminar. 59–82.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic. 295–318.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R. (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1981). Invitations, compliments, and the competence of the native speaker. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 24:7–22.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar