Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:34.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participation cues: Coordinating activity and collaboration in complex online gaming worlds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2010

Elizabeth Keating  and
Chiho Sunakawa
Elizabeth Keating
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712-0303ekeating@mail.utexas.edu
Chiho Sunakawa
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712-0303chihos@mail.utexas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of digital communication technologies not only has an influence on human communicative practices, but also creates new spaces for human collaborative activity. In this article we discuss a technologically mediated context for interaction, computer games. Closely looking at interactions among a group of gamers, we examine how players are managing complex, shifting frameworks of participation, the virtual game world and the embodied world of talk and plans for action. Introducing the notion of participation cues, we explain how interactants are able to orient to, plan, and execute collaborative actions that span quite different environments with quite different types of agency, possible acts, and consequences. Novel abilities to interact across diverse spaces have consequences for understanding how humans build coordinated action through efficient, multimodal communication mechanisms. (Computer-mediated communication, language and technology, gaming, gesture, participation, multimodality)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 331 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarsand, Pål André (2008). Frame switches and identity performances: Alternating between online and offline. Text & Talk 28:147–65.Google Scholar
Alby, Francesca, & Zucchermaglio, Cristina (2007). Embodiment at the interface: Materialization practices in web design. Research on Language & Social Interaction 40:255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Annice I. (2005). Chaining spaces. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:194–217.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, Jo, & Rutter, Jason (2003). The gendering of computer gaming: Experience and space. In Raessens, Joost & Goldstein, Jeffery (eds.), Handbook of computer game studies, 301–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carrington, Victoria (2004). Texts and literacies of the Shi Jinrui. British Journal of the Sociology of Education 25:215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, Manuel (2001). The Internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Mark G. (2009). Communication, coordination, and camaraderie in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture 4:47–73.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael; Engeström, Yrjö; & Vasquez, Olga (eds.) (1997). Mind, culture, and activity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ducheneaut, Nicolas; Yee, Nicholas; Nickell, Eric; & Moore, Robert J. (2007). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. CHI 2007 Proceedings, 839–48.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997a). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997b). Indexical speech across Samoan communities. American Anthropologist 99:342–54.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (2006). Transcripts, like shadows on a wall. Mind, Culture and Activity 13:301–10.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2003). Producing and editing diagrams using co-speech gesture: Spatializing non-spatial relations in explanations of kinship in Laos. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 13(1):7–50.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Brian; Agelidis, Makrina; Dill, John; Tan, Paul; Collaud, Gerald; & Jones, Chris (1997). CZWeb: Fish-eye views for visualizing the World-Wide Web. 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International '97), 719–22.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2002). Time in action. Current Anthropology 43:S19–S35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18:53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Engeström, Yrjö & Middleton, David (eds.), Cognition and communication at work, 61–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2004). Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–44. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2007) Environmental coupled gestures. In Cassel, Justin & Levy, Elena (eds.) Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hanks, William (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Elisabeth (2008). Girls, gaming, and trajectories of technological expertise. In Kafai, Yasmin B., Heeter, Carrie, Denner, Jill, & Sun, Jennifer Y. (eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, 217–30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, Robert (1960/2008). Death and the right hand. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. (2004). The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In Scollon, Ron & LeVine, Phillip (eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis, 184–95. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H; Garralda, Angel; Li, David C. S.; & Lock, Graham (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 15:1–23.Google Scholar
Jones, Sydney, & Fox, Susannah (2009). Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Online: http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1093/generations-online.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (2005). Societal problems with mobile phone usage in 15 countries. Report for NTT DoCoMo, Japan. Online: http://www.moba-ken.jp/wp-content/pdf/final_keating.pdf.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (2006). Habits and innovations: Designing language for new, technologically mediated sociality. In Levinson, Stephen & Enfield, Nick (eds.), Roots of human sociality, 332–50. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (2008). Space shifting: New technologies, new opportunities. Proceedings of SALSA XVI, the Symposium about Language and Society Austin. Texas Linguistic Forum 52:70–79.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth; Edwards, Terra; and Mirus, Gene (2008). Cybersign and new proximities: Impacts of new communication technologies on space and language. Journal of Pragmatics 40:1067–81.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth, & Mirus, Gene (2003). American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Language in Society 32:693–714.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (1973). The role of visible behaviour in the organization of social interaction. In von Cranach, Mario & Vine, Ian (eds.), Social communication and movement: Studies of interaction and expression in man and chimpanzee, 29–74. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (1990). Conducting interactions: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Denise L., & Low, Setha M. (1990). The built environment and spatial form. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:453–505.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Curtis, & Streeck, Jürgen (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In McNeill, David (ed.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action, 118–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1992). Activity types and language. In Drew, Paul & Heritage, John (eds.), Talk at work, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia (1998). Mediated childhoods: A comparative approach to young people's changing media environment in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 13(4):435–56.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (2006). Gesture, gaze, and ground. In Renals, Steve & Bengio, Samy (eds.), Machine learning for multimodal interaction: Second international workshop (MLMI 2005), July 11–13, 2005. Revised selected papers, 1–14. Edinburgh: Springer.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies 18:58–73.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies 9:194–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Keith (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 156:113–45.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice (2004). Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language & Social Interaction 37:447–80.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Jacoby, Sally; & Gonzales, Patrick (1994). Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations 1:151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, Susan (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In Cazden, Courtney B., John, Vera P., & Hymes, Dell (eds.), Functions of language in the classroom, 370–94. New York: Columbia Teachers Press.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant (2004). Editorial: Mediated interpretation of hybrid textual environments. Text 24:297–301.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In Heritage, John & Maxwell Atkinson, John (eds.), Structures of social action, 266–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1998). Body torque. Social Research 65:536–96.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2005). Gesture in the pursuit and display of recognition: A Caribbean case study. Semiotica 156:55–87.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (1992). Technologies of accountability: Of lizards and aeroplanes. In Button, Graham (ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology, 113–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wasson, Christina (2006). Being in two spaces at once: Virtual meetings and their representation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16:103–30.Google Scholar
Westby, Carol, & Atencio, David J. (2002). Computers, culture, and learning. Topics in Language Disorders 22:70–87.Google Scholar
Williams, Dmitri; Ducheneaut, Nicolas; Xiong, Li; Yee, Nick; & Nickell, Eric (2006). From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture 1:338–61.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953/2001). Philosophical investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, Mark (1997). Space in the video game. In Wolf, Mark J. P. (ed.), The medium of the video game, 51–76. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Yee, Nicholas (2006). The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15:309–29.Google Scholar