Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:26:38.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Place reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional affordances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Mark Dingemanse ,
Giovanni Rossi  and
Simeon Floyd
Mark Dingemanse*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Giovanni Rossi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Simeon Floyd
Affiliation:
Radboud University
*
Address for correspondence: Mark Dingemanse, P.O. Box 310 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandsmark.dingemanse@mpi.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People often begin stories in conversation by referring to person, time, and place. We study story beginnings in three societies and find place reference is recurrently used to (i) set the stage, foreshadowing the type of story and the kind of response due, and to (ii) make the story cohere, anchoring elements of the developing story. Recipients orient to these interactional affordances of place reference by responding in ways that attend to the relevance of place for the story and by requesting clarification when references are incongruent or noticeably absent. The findings are based on 108 story beginnings in three unrelated languages: Cha'palaa, a Barbacoan language of Ecuador; Northern Italian, a Romance language of Italy; and Siwu, a Kwa language of Ghana. The commonalities suggest we have identified generic affordances of place reference, and that storytelling in conversation offers a robust sequential environment for systematic comparative research. (Storytelling, place, narrative, conversation analysis, interactional linguistics)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 129 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank Uwe-Alexander Küttner, Jack Sidnell, the audience at the 2013 Nijmegen workshop on Place Reference, and two anonymous reviewers for Language in Society for helpful comments. We are grateful to Nick Enfield for supporting most of this work through the ERC project Human sociality and systems of language use (ERC grant 240853). Funding at later stages has come from the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, a Veni grant from NWO (to MD), and the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Research on Intersubjectivity in Interaction (for GR).

References

REFERENCES

Bamberg, Michael, & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 28(3):377–96.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1966). Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits. Communications 8(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basso, Keith (1984). Stalking with stories: Names, places, and moral narratives among the Western Apache. In Plattner, Stuart (ed.), Text, play and story: The construction and reconstruction of self and society, 19–55. Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul; Peterson, Mary A.; Nadel, Lynn; & Garrett, Merrill F. (1996). Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, John D., & Johnson, Marcia K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(6):717–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard; Haspelmath, Martin; & Bickel, Balthasar (2004). Leipzig glossing rules. Online: eva.mpg.de. https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php; accessed December 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, & Floyd, Simeon (2014). Conversation across cultures. In Enfield, N. J., Kockelman, Paul, & Sidnell, Jack (eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 434–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark; Roberts, Seán G.; Baranova, Julija; Blythe, Joe; Drew, Paul; Floyd, Simeon; Gisladottir, Rosa S.; Kendrick, Kobin H.; Levinson, Stephen C.; Manrique, Elizabeth; Rossi, Giovanni; & Enfield, N. J. (2015). Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLOS ONE 10(9). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egbert, Maria M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language & Social Interaction 30(1):1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2013). Reference in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 433–54. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Stivers, Tanya (eds.) (2007). Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M., & Küntay, Aylin (1997). The occasioning and structure of conversational stories. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives, 133–66. (Typological studies in language 34.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2015). Small stories research: Methods – analysis – outreach. In Fina, Anna De & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, 255–72. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 225–46. (Studies in emotion and social interaction.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1995). The negotiation of coherence within conversation. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Givón, Talmy (eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text, 117–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & Heritage, John (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, David N. (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294–338. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, Jim (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 219–48. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35(4):418–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, Gene H. (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 43–59. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia; Lerner, Gene H.; Zinken, Jörg; Wilkinson, Sue; Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi; & Ellis, Sonja (2013). Reformulating place. Journal of Pragmatics 55:43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Joel C. (1984). Place, names, and authority in Weyéwa ritual speech. Language in Society 13(4):455–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, & Waletzky, Joshua (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, June (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., & Wilkins, David P. (2006). Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., & Johnson, Nancy S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology 9(1):111–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Michael, & Sacks, Harvey (1988). On ‘understanding’ in the analysis of natural conversation. In Moerman, Michael, Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis, 180–86. (University of Pennsylvania publications in conduct and communication.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Propp, Vladímir (1928/1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rossano, Federico (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In Bobrow, Daniel G. & Collins, Allan (eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, 211–36. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 337–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1986). Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics 15(1–2):127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992a). Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. Ed. by Jefferson, Gail. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992b). Lectures on conversation, vol. 2. Ed. by Jefferson, Gail. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, & Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4):696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Sudnow, David N. (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75–119. New York: MacMillan/The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1982). Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997). ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4):97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2000). Primus inter pares: Storytelling and male peer groups in an Indo-Guyanese rumshop. American Ethnologist 27(1):72–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (ed.) (2009). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(1):31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya; Enfield, N. J.: Brown, Penelope; Englert, Christina; Hayashi, Makoto; Heinemann, Trine; Hoymann, Gertie; Rossano, Federico; de Ruiter, Jan Peter; Yoon, Kyung-Eun; & Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(26):10587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorndyke, Perry W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology 9(1):77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter; Brugman, Hennie; Russel, Albert; Klassmann, Alex; & Sloetjes, Han (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556–59. Online: http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/.Google Scholar
Yasui, Eiko (2011). Negotiating story entry: A micro-analytic study of storytelling projection in English and Japanese. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. (1999). Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 32(1–2):195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar