Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:07:27.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reassessing the status of Black English (Review article)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Arthur K. Spears
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The City College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10031

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAV panel discussion. American Speech 62:3240.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., & Maynor, N. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G., (1989). The divergence controversy. American Speech 64:1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, J. (1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Butters, R. R. (1989). The death of Black English: Divergence and convergence in black and while vernaculars. (Bamberger Beiträge zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft 25.) New York: Peter Long.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1985). The increasing divergence of black and white vernaculars: Introduction to the research reports. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1986). De facto segregation of black and white vernaculars. In Sankoff, David (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 124.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV panel discussion. American Speech 62:512.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1977). Syntactic reanalysis. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 57139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, J., & Harris, W. A. (1986). The use of the verbal -s inflection in BEV. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV Panel proceedings. American Speech 62:5562.Google Scholar
Spears, A. K. (1985). Review of J. Baugh, Black street speech: Its history, origin, and structure. Language in Society 14:101–08.Google Scholar
Spears, A. K. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV Panel proceedings. American Speech 62:4855, 7172.Google Scholar
Spears, A. K. (1990). The grammaticalization of disapproval in black American English. In Rieber, Robert (ed.), CUNYForum: Papers in linguistics. (No. 15, 1 & 2.) New York: The City University of New York, The Graduate School, Linguistics Department. 3044.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., & Poplack, S. (1988). How Black English past got to the present: Evidence from Samaná. Language in Society 17:513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn-Cooke, F. B. (1976). The implication of a phonological change: The case of resyllabification in Black English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Vaughn-Cooke, F. B. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV Panel proceedings. American Speech 62:1232.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV Panel proceedings. American Speech 62:4048.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1990). Re-examining Vernacular Black English: Review of Edgar W. Schneider, American earlier Black English: Morphological and syntactic variables and R. R. Butters, The death of Black English: Divergence and convergence in black and white vernaculars. Language 66:121–33.Google Scholar