Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:27:06.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representations of questioning and answering in children's first school books

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Carolyn D. Baker  and
Peter Freebody
Carolyn D. Baker
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural Studies in Education, University of New England
Peter Freebody
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural Studies in Education, University of New England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children's first school books contain a considerable amount of reported talk among characters in the stories. This is a central aspect of the characterization of these books as transitional from the conventions of oral language to the conventions of written prose, that is, as introductions to literacy. The nature of the written representation of conversation in such books has not previously been examined. This paper presents a partial analysis of this feature of beginning school readers, focussing on “question-answer sequences.” We show how these representations of talk compare with naturalistic research on child-adult interaction at home and in classrooms, and we propose that the model of child-adult talk portrayed in “home” and “school” scenes in the books appears to endorse some of the conventions for participation in instructional talk, and in this respect is implicitly a source of socialization into classroom culture. At the same time, we find that the texts give child speakers far more initiative in conversation than typically obtains in classroom talk, and this is seen also to be a feature of the social constitution of the child in these texts. Thus an image of childhood which combines conversational initiative and conversational competence as a member of the classroom community is conveyed. The paper also points out possible difficulties for child readers in interpreting the talk-on-paper, arising both from textual formats and from the particular version of the child as conversationalist which the books describe (Child-adult conversation, question-answer sequences, first school books, literacy acquisition).

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 451 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, C. D., & Freebody, P. (in press). “Constituting the child” in beginning school reading books. British Journal of Sociology and Education 8.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1979). “We're friends, right?”: Children's use of access rituals in a nursery school.” Language in Society 8:315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1981). Entering the child's world - Research strategies for field entry and data collection ina preschool setting. In Green, J. L. & Wallatt, C., (eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. 117–46.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. D. (1980). Patterns of power and authority in classroom talk. In Woods, P. (ed.), Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school. London: Croom Helm. 237–53.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. D. (1981). Analysing classroom talk. In French, P. & MacLure, M. (eds.), Adult-child conversation. London: Croom Helm. 289–306.Google Scholar
Freebody, P., & Baker, C. D. (1985). Children's first school books: Introductions to the culture of literacy. Harvard Educational Review 55(4):381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In Page, G., Elkins, J., & O'Connor, B. (eds.), Communication through reading. Adelaide: Australian Reading Association. 37–52.Google Scholar
Heap, J. L. (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry. 15:245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, C. (1982). Introduction: Constituting the child. In Jenks, C. (ed.), The sociology of childhood: Essential readings. London: Batsford. 9–24.Google Scholar
Klare, G. R. (1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly 10:62–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLure, M., & French, P. (1981). A comparison of talk at home and at school. In Wells, G. (ed.), Learning through interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press. 205–39.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7:183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHoul, A. W. (1982). Telling how texts talk: Essays on reading and ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. W. (in press). An initial investigation of the usability of fictional conversation for doing conversational analysis. Semiotica.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1974). Accomplishing classroom lessons. In Cicourel, A. et al. (eds.), Language use and school performance. New York: Academic. 76–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). The language of instruction: The literate basis of schooling. In Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Montague, W. (eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. 65–89.Google Scholar
Payne, G., & Hustler, D. (1980). Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education 1(1):49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, K. (1982). Some language problems in school learning. In Mercer, N. (ed.), Language in school and community. London: Edward Arnold. 3–29.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents: The acquisition of communicative competence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. A. (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. 411–38.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1974). On the analysability of stories by children. In Turner, R. (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 216–32.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(6): 1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 28–52.Google Scholar
Speier, M. (1976). The child as conversationalist: Some culture contact features of conversational interactions between adults and children. In Hammersley, M. & Woods, P. (eds.), The process of schooling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 98–103.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (1981). Teacher-pupil question-answer sequences: Some problems of analysis. In Barton, L. & Walker, S. (eds.), Schools, teachers and teaching. Sussex: Falmer. 265–82.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1981). Learning through interaction: The study of language development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G., & Montgomery, M. (1981). Adult-child interaction at home and at school. In French, P. & MacLure, M. (eds.), Adult-child conversation. London: Croom Helm. 210–43.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. (1981a). Children's use of address terms. In French, P. & MacLure, M. (eds.), Adult-child conversation. London: Croom Helm. 142–58.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. (1981b). The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences. Semiotica 37(1/2):59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, A. J. (1981c). Two request forms of four year olds. Journal of Pragmatics 5:511–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar