Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:50:04.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert Hopper, Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992 Pp. xi, 247. Hb $39.95, pb $14.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Marilyn Carter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Sociology, University of OregonEugene, OR 97403

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Frankel, Richard (1989). “I wz wondering – uhm could Raid uhm effect the brain permanently d'y know?”: Some observations on the intersection of speaking and writing in calls to a poison control center. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53:195226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of conversation. Language 50:696735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9:111–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn, & Zimmerman, Don (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:172–85.Google Scholar