Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:23:34.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2007

EREZ LEVON
EREZ LEVON
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, New York University, 26 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10003, erez.levon@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article illustrates the use of an empirical method for examining the perceptual identification of gayness in male speakers. It demonstrates how, by digitally manipulating the speech of isolated individuals, it is possible to obtain reliable evidence that pitch range and sibilant duration may act as indexical of a gay male identity. Further scrutiny of this result, however, illustrates that linguistic indexicality is not as straightforward as it originally appears. Subsequent analyses of the data highlight the ways in which the perceptual evaluation of sexuality is a highly contingent process, dependent upon a variety of sociolinguistic factors. An envelope of variation in listeners' affective judgments of a speaker is shown to exist, and it is argued that research on the perception of identity must go beyond identification of salient features, and also consider when and why these features are not salient.I greatly benefited from the insight and assistance of the following people, whom I would like to thank: Renée Blake, Lisa Davidson, Penny Eckert, Rudi Gaudio, Ron Butters, Keith Walters, Barbara Johnstone, and three anonymous reviewers. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting in Oakland, California, in January 2005, and the 72nd Southeastern Conference on Linguistics (SECOL) in Raleigh, North Carolina in April 2005. I thank the participants at those events for their questions and comments. All errors are, of course, my own.

Keywords

prosodyperceptionsexuality and gendercontextualization
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 533 - 554
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avery, Jack, & Liss, Julie (1996). Acoustic characteristics of less-masculine-sounding male speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99:3738–48.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33:501–47.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom, & Leap, William (2004). Introduction: Globalization and “new” articulations of same-sex desire. In William Leap & Tom Boellstorff (eds.), Speaking in queer tongues: Globalization and gay language, 1–21. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Cameron, Deborah, & Kulick, Don (2003). Language and sexuality. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Eckert, Penelope (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of social meaning in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope (2002). Demystifying sexuality and desire. In Kathryn Campbell-Kibler et al. (eds.), Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice, 99–110. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Fox, Robert Allen, & Nissen, Shawn (2002). Age related changes in the acoustic characteristics of voiceless English fricatives. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of Linguistics and Phonetics. Chiba City, Japan: Meikai University.
Fry, Dennis (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1:126–52.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Rudy (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties of gay and straight men. American Speech 69:30–57.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline (1989). Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language and Communication 9:299–311.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline (1995). Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication 15:43–61.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Greg (1996). Lesbian and gay male language use: A critical review. American Speech 71:49–71.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor (1971). On the pitch and compass of the speaking voice. Journal of Phonetics 1:59–68.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Tom, & Scherer, Klaus (1999). The effects of emotion on voice quality. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences. Berkeley: University of California.
Klatt, Dennis (1974). The duration of [s] in English words. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 17:51–63.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3:129–40.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:243–85.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse (1975). Some factors affecting the duration of syllabic nuclei in English. In G. Drachman (ed.), Proceedings of the First Salzburg Conference on Linguistics, 81–104. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Levon, Erez (2004). Examining a gay prosody: Issues in theory, methodology and identity. Paper presented at Lavender Languages and Linguistics XI, American University, Washington, D.C.
Levon, Erez (2006). Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation and the affective judgments of men's speech. American Speech 81:56–78.Google Scholar
Linville, Sue Ellen (1998). Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men's speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 50:35–48.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In James Stigler Richard Schweder & Gilbert Herdt (eds.), Cultural psychology, 287–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ochs, Elinor (1992). Indexing gender. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oller, D. Kimbrough (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54:1235–47.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert (n.d.). The stylistic use of phonation type: Falsetto, fundamental frequency and the linguistic construction of personae. Ms., Stanford University.
Rogers, Henry, & Smyth, Ron (2003). Phonetic differences between gay- and straight-sounding male speakers of North American English. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1855–58. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rogers, Henry; Smyth, Ron; & Jacobs, Greg (2000). Vowel and sibilant duration in gay- and straight-sounding male speech. Paper presented at IGALA 1, Stanford University.
Scherer, Klaus (1972). Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality 40:191–210.Google Scholar
Umeda, Noriko (1977). Consonant duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61:846–58.Google Scholar
Valentine, David (2003). ‘I went to bed with one of my own kind once’: The erasure of desire in the name of identity. Language and Communication 23:123–38.Google Scholar