Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:57:12.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some experimental findings about the question of politeness and women's speech (Research note)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Maria Rosa Baroni  and
Valentina D'urso
Maria Rosa Baroni
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, University of Padua
Valentina D'urso
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, University of Padua
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A particular factor in linguistic variation which has often been connected to female speech is politeness, as first described by Lakoff (1973a, 1973b), manifested not only by means of intonation, but also through the use of particular formulae of courtesy, through the use of tag questions at the end of interrogatives, and the use of longer, less direct and peremptory sentences.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baroni, M. R. (1983). II linguaggio trasparente. Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. R. & D'Urso, V. (1983). II linguaggio degli uomini e delle donne: l'intonazione cortese. In Baroni, 1983.Google Scholar
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distances. Journal of Applied Psychology 9:299–308.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1980). How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 93–110.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society 6:3130–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elyan, O., Smith, P., Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. (1978). RP = accented female speech: The voice of perceived androgyny? InTrudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguislic patterns in British English. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973 a). The logic of politeness: Or, minding your P's and Q's. In Corum, C., Stark, T. C. Smith, & Weiser, A. (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of he Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, 04. 292–305.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973b). Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2:45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. S., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Barr, W. M., & Atkins, B. K. (1980). “Women's language” or “powerless language?” In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 93–110.Google Scholar