Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:10:02.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial frames of reference in language and thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2006

William F. Hanks
William F. Hanks
Affiliation:
Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, wfhanks@berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stephen C. Levinson, Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Series in Language, Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xxiii, 389. Pb $27.99.

This is an important book that makes basic arguments of real consequence for current understanding of the relation among language, gesture, and mind. Convincing new experimental and field data from a wide range of languages are used to argue that human spatial cognition is organized into a limited set of types, that cross-linguistic variation in spatial categorization is far more extensive than previously known, and that language structure has a profound, if mediated, influence on thought, gesture, and other modalities of nonlinguistic cognition. Levinson carefully separates linguistic from cognitive analyses in order to trace the relations between them. His book is also an exercise in comparative linguistics, and a strong proposal for a typology of linguistic systems of spatial representation. The scope and strength of the arguments ensure the significance of the book and the debates it has already begun to provoke (see Gallistel 2002, Levinson et al. 2002, Li & Gleitman 2002, Majid 2002).

Type
REVIEW ARTICLE
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 285 - 296
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bourdieu, Pierre (1972). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Certeau, Michel de (1984). The practice of everyday life. Stephen Rendall, trans. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gallistel, C.R. (2002). Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Science 6:321–22.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred (1985). How to read a map: Remarks on the practical logic of navigation. Man, n.s. 20:271–86.Google Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving (1955). Cultural factors in spatial orientation. In A. I. Hallowell, Culture and Experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hanks, William F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, William F. (2005). Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology 46:191–220.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar (1969 [1957]). The semantics of Icelandic orientation. In S. A. Tyler (ed.), Cognitive anthropology, 330–42. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.; Kita, S.; Haun, D. B.; & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84:155–88.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83:265–94.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa (2002). Frames of reference and language concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6:503–4.Google Scholar
Munn, Nancy (1986). The fame of Gawa: A symbolic study of value transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75–119. New York: Free Press.