Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:19:01.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Substrate influence in Hawai‘i Creole English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

JEFF SIEGEL
JEFF SIEGEL
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia, jsiegel@metz.une.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1970s, it has been assumed that the diverse languages of plantation laborers in Hawai‘i had little effect on the development of Hawai‘i Creole English (HCE); this view supported theories that emphasize the role of innate linguistic universals in creolization. But recent research has revealed (a) widespread bilingualism among locally born children of laborers before HCE emerged, and (b) the dominance of two ethnic groups at the time – the Chinese and Portuguese. This article re-examines the issue of substrate influence in HCE by concentrating on these two groups. Socio-historical and linguistic evidence is presented to show the likelihood that the Cantonese and Portuguese substrates reinforced and expanded various features of existing pidgins that had diffused to Hawai‘i. Portuguese also appears to be the origin of several key features of HCE which differ from those of other creoles. The implications of these findings for universalist theories of creole genesis are discussed.

Keywords

CreolespidginsHawai‘isubstrate influencelinguistic universalsPortugueseCantonese
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 197 - 236
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)