Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:49:14.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Werner Nothdurft (ed.), Schlichtung, Band 1: Streit schlichten-Gesprächsanalytische Untersuchungen zu institutionellen Formen konsensueller Konfliktregelung [Mediation, vol. 1: Mediating disputes-Conversation-analytic research on institutional forms of consensual resolution of disputes]. (Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, 5.) Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995. Pp. viii, 431. Hb DM 206.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Helmut Gruber
Affiliation:
Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Wien, Berggasse 11, A-1090 Vienna, Austria, helmut@ling.univie.ac.at

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Candlin, Christopher, & Maley, Yon (1994). Interextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution. (Centre for Language and Social Life, Working Papers, no.1.) Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review 56:818–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, You (1995). From adjudication to mediation: Third party discourse in coflict resolution. Journal of Pragmatics 23:93110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Calvin (1996). Competing constraints in alternative dispute resolution: The interactional achievement of formality and informality in mediation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 19:2.79114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar