Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:55:51.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing intercultural capability in learning languages: Some issues and considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Angela Scarino
Angela Scarino*
Affiliation:
University of South Australiaangela.scarino@unisa.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Teachers of languages, as well as educators in general and employers, increasingly recognise the importance of developing intercultural capability. This recognition, however, brings the question of how this is evidenced as an outcome of learning. The assessment of this capability poses a range of theoretical and practical challenges. I begin with a description of languages learning within an intercultural orientation and a model for understanding assessment. I then discuss issues of conceptualising and defining the construct, as integral to the process of assessment. Next, I consider issues in eliciting intercultural capability in a proposed framework that includes assessment as both communicative performance (elicited in ‘critical moments’) and meta-awareness (elicited in commentaries). To conclude, I discuss issues related to identifying and judging evidence of the development of the intercultural capability and warranting the inferences made about students' developing understanding. The discussion is based on the experience of ongoing studies investigating the assessment of the intercultural capability in learning languages and in international education.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 67 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alred, G., Byram, M. & Fleming, M. (2003). Intercultural experience and education. Clevedon: Multicultural Matters.Google Scholar
American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages (1985). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines (revised edn.), Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL Materials Center.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. M., Bennett, M. J. & Allen, W. (1999). Developing intercultural competence in the language classroom. In Paige, R. M., Lange, D. L. & Yershova, Y. A. (eds.), Culture as core: Integrating culture into the language curriculum. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, 13–46.Google Scholar
Brislin, R., Cushner, K., Cherrie, C. & Yong, M. (1986). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Cleveland: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M., Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Byram, M., Morgan, C. & Colleagues, (1994). Teaching-and-learning language-and-culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byram, M. & Zarate, G. (1994). Définitions, objectifs et évaluation de la compétence socioculturelle [Definitions, objectives and evaluation of socio-cultural competence]. Strasbourg: Report for the Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cadd, M. (1994). An attempt to reduce ethnocentrism in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 27.2, 143–160.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing 20.4, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council for the Australian Federation (2007). The future of schooling in Australia: A report by the States and Territories (Federalist Paper 2). Melbourne: Department of Premier and Cabinet. http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/2007/federalist-paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Crichton, J. & Scarino, A. (2007). How are we to understand the ‘intercultural dimension’? An examination of the intercultural dimension of internationalisation in the context of higher education in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30.1, 4.1–4.21.Google Scholar
Crichton, J., Scarino, A., Papademetre, L., Barker, S., Lushington, K. & Woods, M. (2006). Assessing and evaluating intercultural teaching and learning: A focus on sites of intercultural interaction (A commissioned Teaching and Learning Study by the University of South Australia). Adelaide: Research Centre for Languages and Cultures, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Delandshere, G. (2002) Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record 104.7, 1461–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gipps, C. (1999). Sociocultural aspects of assessment. In Pearson, P. D. & Nejad, A. I. (eds.), Review of research in education (vol. 24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 357–394.Google Scholar
Haertel, H. H., Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C. & Gee, J. P. (2008). Introduction. In Moss, et al. (eds.), 1–17.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal 70.4, 366–372.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1999). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In Byram, M. & Fleming, M. (eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16–31.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2002). In search of the intercultural. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6.2, 275–285.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal 90.2, 249–252.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J., Papademetre, L., Scarino, A. & Kohler, M. (2003). Report on intercultural language learning. Canberra: Department of Education, Science & Training [now Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations]. http://www1.curriculum.edu.au/nalsas/pdf/intercultural.pdf.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. & Scarino, A. (forthcoming). Eliciting the intercultural in foreign language education. In Sercu, L. & Paran, A. (eds.), Testing the untestable in language and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lovat, T. J. & Smith, D. L. (2003). Curriculum: Action on reflection (4th edn.). Tuggerah, N.S.W.: Social Science Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing 18.4, 333–349.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2003). Tearing us apart again: The paradigm war and the search for validity. EUROSLA Yearbook 3, 229–238.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd edn.). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan, 13–103.Google Scholar
Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher 25.1, 20–28 & 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, P. A. (2008). Sociocultural implications for Assessment I: Classroom assessment. In Moss, et al. (eds.). 222–258.Google Scholar
Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C., Gee, J. P., Haertel, H. H. & Young, L. J. (eds.) (2008). Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papademetre, L. & Scarino, A. (forthcoming). Reflections on practice: Given a set of principles for intercultural teaching and learning, what are the implications for languages pedagogy? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy: From a national to a transnational paradigm. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education 13, 191–209.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (forthcoming). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?file.txt; doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.Google Scholar
Sercu, L. (2004) Assessing intercultural competence: A framework for systematic test development in foreign language education and beyond. Intercultural Education 15.1, 73–89.Google Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27.2, 4–13.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29.7, 4–14.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. (1986). Objectives for modern language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar