Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:03:05.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

S. P. Corder
S. P. Corder
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 1975 , pp. 201 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. P. B. (1973). Applied grammatical models in a remedial English syllabus. In Corder, S. Pit & Roulet, E. (eds.), Theoretical linguistic models in applied linguistics. AIMAV, Brussels; Didier, Paris.Google Scholar
Ballard, V. S. (1970). Frequent errors in French. TBull, 5, 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. (1970). Fehlerlinguistik. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 397–414.Google Scholar
Boomer, D. S. & Layer, J. D. M. (1968). Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. W. (1973). Development of the first language in the human species. American Psychologist, 02 73, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 1, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, M., Dulay, H. & Hernandez, E. (1973). Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Burt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The gooficon. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Burt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1975). Global and local mistakes. In Schumann & Stenson, New frontiers.Google Scholar
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J. & Schumann, J. (1974). Testing hypotheses about second language acquisition: the copula and negative in three subjects. Working Papers on Bilingualism, no. 3. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1968). Zum Pidgin-Deutsch der Gastarbeiter. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung, 35, 130–9.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1969). The analogy between first and second language learning. IRAL, 7, 207- 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1973). The comparison of language development in native children and foreign adults. IRAL, 11, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. IRAL, 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1971 a). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. IRAL, 9, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1971 b). Describing the language learner's language. CILT Reports and Papers, no. 6, 57–64.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1972). Die Rolle der Interpretation bei der Untersuchungvon Schulfehiern. In Nickel, G., Fehierkunde. Berlin.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1974 a). The elicitation of interlanguage. Special issue of IRAL on the occasion of Bertil Malmberg's 60th birthday. Stuttgart: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (forthcoming). Simple codes and the source of the second language learner's initial heuristic hypothesis. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. & Roulet, E. (eds.) (forthcoming). Linguistic approaches to applied linguistics. Papers from the IVth Neuchatel Colloquium, 1975. AIMAV, Brussels; Didier, Paris.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1972). Goofing: an indicator of children's second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 22, 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dato, D. P. (1972). The development of the Spanish verb phrase in children's second language learning. In Pimsleur, & Quinn, (eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 2, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 a). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 b). A new perspective on the creative construction hypothesis in child second language acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 4,71–98. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 c). Errors and strategies in child language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974 d). You can't learn without goofing: an analysis of children's second language errors. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar
Duškov´, L. (1969). On sources of errors in foreign languages. IRAL, 7, 11–36.Google Scholar
Eliasson, S. (1973). Review of Filipović (ed.), Zagreb conference on English contrastive projects. Studia Linguistica, 27.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). Structure and process in language acquisition. Georgetown Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, no. 23, 313–53. 21st Annual Round Table.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974). Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby-talk in six languages. In Gumperz, & Hymes, (eds.), The ethnography of communication, 103–4. Special number of American Anthropologist, 66, 6, Pt. 2. Washington, American Anthropological Assoc.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of the copula and the notion simplicity. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolisation of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Towards a characterisation of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 1–14.Google Scholar
Fitikides, T. J. (1967). Common mistakes in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
French, F. G. (1949). Common errors in English: their cause, prevention and cure. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 229, 110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, H. V. (1972). Common errors in language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gorbet, F. (1974). Error analysis: what teachers can do. In Shiu, R. (ed.), Errors: a new perspective. Toronto: Research Division, Directorate of Studies, Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar
Grauberg, W. (1971). An error analysis in German of first year university students. In Perren, G. & Trim, J. (eds.), Papers for the second international congress of applied linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hakuta, , Kenji, (1974). Preliminary report on the development of grammatical morphemes in a Japanese girl learning English as a second language. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 3, 18–43. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (1973). The insufficiency of error analysis. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar
Hamp, E. P. (1965). What a contrastive grammar is not, if it is. Georgetown Round Table Monograph, no. 21.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. R. (1972). Some studies in language learning. Working papers in TESL, no. 6, 29–36. Los Angeles: University of Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. R. (1974). Second language learning – universals? Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 3, 06 1974. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Holley, F. & King, J. M. (1975). Imitation and correction in foreign language learning. In Schumann & Stenson, New frontiers.Google Scholar
Jain, M. P. (1974). Error analysis: source, cause and significance. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar
James, C. (1971 a). The exculpation of contrastive linguistics. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Papers in contrastive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, C. (1971 b). Foreign language learning by dialect expansion. Paper read to PAKS Symposium, Stuttgart, 1971.Google Scholar
James, C. (1974). Linguistic measures for error gravity. AVLA Journal, 12, 1, 3–9.Google Scholar
James, C. (1975). Judgements of error gravities. ELS, 07 1975.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (1973). The identification and evaluation of error in foreign languages; a functional approach. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (forthcoming). Problems in the study of the communicative effect of learner's errors. In Corder& Roulet (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, T. P. (1974). Contrastive generative grammar: theoretical foundations. Lodz: University Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1974). Elicitation, lateralization and error analysis. York Papers in Linguistics, 4. University of York.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lange, M. (1974). L'analyse des erreurs: état actuel de la recherche. In Shiu, R. (ed.), Errors: a new perspective. Toronto: Research Division, Directorate of Studies, Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar
Lee, W. R. (1970). The Dolphin English Course – Teachers' companion. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Leisi, E. (1972). Theoretische Grundlagen der Fehierbewertung. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Fehierkunde.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. S. M. (forthcoming). Skill theory and language teaching. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar
Levenston, E. A. (1971). Over-indulgence and under-representation – aspects of mother tongue interference. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Contrastive linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindell, E. (1973). The four pillars: on the goals of foreign language teaching. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar
Linnarud, M. (1975). Lexis in free production. An analysis of the lexical texture of Swedish students' written work. Report No. 6. Department of English, Lund University.Google Scholar
Milon, J. P. (1974). The development of negation in English by a second language learner. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, , Neil, . (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 2. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Nehls, , Dietrich, (1974). Fehleranalyse versus Kontrastive Analyse. Reports of 5th Annual Congress of G.A.L. (1973 IRAL Sonderband). Stuttgart: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systemsof foreign language learners. IRAL, 9, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemser, W. & Slama-Cazacu, T. (1970). Contact analysis: a psycholinguistic approach. Revue Romaine de Linguistique, 15, 2.Google Scholar
Newmark, L. & Reibel, D. (1967). Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. IRAL, 6, 3.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (1971 a). Contrastive linguistics and foreign language teaching. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Papers in contrastive linguistics. London: CUP.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (1971 b). Problems of learners' difficulties in foreign language acquisition. IRAL, 9, 3, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, G. (1972). Grundsätzliches zur Fehleranalyse & Fehierbewertung. In Nickel, G. (ed.), Fehlerkunde.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (ed.) (1972). Fehlerkunde. Berlin: Cornelsen, Velhagen & Kissing.Google Scholar
Nickel, G. (1973). Aspects of error analysis and grading. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar
Olsson, M. (1972). Intelligibility: a study of errors and their importance. The GUME project. Göteborg: Pedagogiska Institutionen Lärarhögskolan.Google Scholar
Olsson, M. (1973). The effects of different types of errors in the communication situation. In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata.Google Scholar
Olsson, M. (1974). A study of errors: frequency, origins and effects. Göteborg: Pedagogiska Institutionen Lärarhögskolan.Google Scholar
Ravem, R. (1974). WH-questions in first and second language learners. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1971 a). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. ELT, 25, 204–19.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1971 b). Error analysis and second language strategies. Language Science, 17, 12–22.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1972). Social factors, interlanguage and language learning. Language Learning, 22, 2, 159–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C. (ed.) (1974 a). Error analysis. Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1974 b). Simplification: a strategy in the adult acquisition of a foreign language: an example from Indonesian/Malay. Paper given at the Second Conference on the Standardisation of Asian Languages. Manila, 1974.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. & Sampson, G. P. (1974). The study of learner English. In Richards, J. C. (ed.), Error analysis.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. (1967). Some implication of generative grammar for the construction of courses in English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 17, 45–68, 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, W. J. (1971). Salient and substantive pidginization. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolisation of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, , John, (1974). The implications of interlanguage, pidginization and creolization for the study of adult second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. & Stenson, N. (1975). New frontiers in second language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, , Larry, (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics, 9, 67–92.Google Scholar
Selinker, , Larry, (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 3, 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1971). Psycholinguistics and contrastive studies. Zagreb Conference on English Contrastive Projects. Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1974). Theoretical interpretation and methodological consequences of ‘regularisation]. In Further developments in contrastive studies. Romanian—English Contrastive Analysis Project. Bucharest University Press.Google Scholar
Sternglass, M. S. (1974). Close similarities in dialect features of black and white college students in remedial composition classes. TESOL Quarterly, 8, 3, 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenson, , Nancy, (1975). Induced errors. In Schumann & Stenson (eds.), New frontiers in second language learning.Google Scholar
Strevens, , Peter, , (1969). Two ways of looking at error analysis. Paper given at GAL meeting, Stuttgart (1969). Zielsprache Deutsch, 1 (1971), 1–6.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. (1973). Introduction to Svartvik, J. (ed.), Errata: papers in error analysis.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. (1973). Errata: papers in error analysis. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Dumas, G. & Naiman, N. (1974). Alternatives to spontaneous speech: elicited translation and imitation as indicators of second language competence. Working Papers in Bilingualism, no. 3. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. P. (1974). Toward a theory of language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 1, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiem, R. (1969). Bibliographyofcontrastive linguistics. PAKS – Arbeitsbericht, 2,79–96; 3/4, 93–120.Google Scholar
Tarone, , Elaine, (1974). A discussion on the Dulay and Burt studies. Working Papers on Bilingualism, no. 4. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Valdman, , Albert, & Phillips, J. S. (forthcoming). Pidginization, creolisation and the elaboration of learner systems. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar
Valdman, , Albert, (1975 a). Error analysis and pedagogical ordering. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.), Linguistic insights in applied linguistics. Brussels, AIMAV; Paris, Didier.Google Scholar
Valdman, , Albert, (1975 b). Bibliography of language learners' approximative systems and error analysis. Washington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Van, Buren P. (1974). Contrastive analysis. In Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P., Techniques in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Váradi, , Tamás, (1973). Strategies of target language learner communications: message adjustment. Paper given at the 6th Conference of the Rumanian–English Linguistic Project, Timisoara, 1973.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, G. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 2. Reprinted in Schumann, & Stenson, (eds.), New frontiers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. W. (forthcoming). The significance of simplification. In Corder, & Roulet, (eds.) (forthcoming), Linguistic approaches.Google Scholar
Zydatiss, W. (1973). Fehler in der Englischen Satzgliedfolge. IRAL, 11, 4, 319–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zydatiss, W. (1974 a). A ‘kiss of life’ for the notion of error. IRAL, 12, 3, 234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zydatiss, W. (1974 b). Lernprobleme im Englischen und ihre Behandlung in einer didaktischen Grammatik. Linguistik und Didaktic, 20, 5.Google Scholar
Zydatiss, W. (1974 c). Some Test Formats for Elicitation Procedures. IRAL, 12, 281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar