Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:22:19.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on language proficiency and aspects of competence2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Brian North
Brian North
Affiliation:
Eurocentres Foundation, Zurich
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

References

Alderson, J.C. (1991). Bands and scores. In Alderson, J. C. & North, B. (eds.), Language testing in the 1990s. London: Modern English Publications/British Council, Macmillan, 71–86.Google Scholar
Alderson, J.C. & Urquhart, S. (1984). Reading in a foreign language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Allen, P., Cummins, J., Mougeon, R. & Swain, M. (1983). The development of bilingual proficiency: interim report on the first year of research. Toronto: Modem Language Centre; OISE.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 4, 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1984). Some comments on the terminology of language testing. In Rivera, C. (ed.),. Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: research and application. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 34–43.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. & Ross, S. (1993). Cross-cultural pragmatics in oral proficiency interview strategies. Paper presented at the 15th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Cambridge and Arnhem, 2–4 August 1993.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind: an evaluation of the construct for second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6, 2, 101–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M. & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 2, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G. (1989). Assessing achievement in the learner centred curriculum. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shilock, R. & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: the roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. (1987). Concepts and categories in language teaching methodology. AILA Review, 4, 25–31.Google Scholar
Burton, D. (1980). Dialogue and discourse: a sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Byram, M. & Zarate, G. (1994). Definitions, objectives and evaluation of socio-cultural competence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe CC-LANG (94) 1.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1983). A communicative competence approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In Rivera, C. (ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: research and application. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 107–22.Google Scholar
Canale, M. (1984). On some theoretical frameworks for language proficiency. In Rivera, C. (ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 28–40.Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1981). A Theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Palmer, A., Groot, P. and Trosper, G. (eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington DC.: TESOL, 31–6.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge. Paper presented at 1983 TESOL Convention (Toronto, Ont., March 1983). Reprinted in Reading in a Foreign Language, 2, 81–91.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 3, 461–81.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. In Oiler, (1983): 80–107.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, cited in e.g. Taylor 1988, Widdowson 1989.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell, cited in e.g. Taylor 1988, Widdowson 1989.Google Scholar
Clark, J.L. (1987). Curriculum renewal in school foreign language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive academic language proficiency: linguistic interdependence, the optimum ages question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19. Toronto, 197–205.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1980). The Cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 3, 175–87.Google Scholar
Czisko, G. (1984). Some problems with empirically-based models of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics 5, 1, 23–38.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1989). Communicative competence as language use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, R. M. (1988). Communicative processes and strategies. Annual Revieiv of Applied Linguistics 9, 108–21.Google Scholar
Elder, C. (1993). How do subject specialists construe classroom language proficiency? Language Testing, 10, 3, 235–54.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Færch, C. (1984). Strategies in production and reception – the empirical evidence. In Davies, A., Criper, C. & Mowat, A.P.R., Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 49–78.Google Scholar
Færch, C. & Kasper, G. K. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Færch, C. & Kasper, G.K. (eds.), 20–60.Google Scholar
Færch, C. & Kasper, G.K. (eds.) (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 1, 43–59.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1979). On fluency. In Fillmore, C.. Kempler, D. & Wang, W. (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behaviour. New York: Academic Press, 85–101.Google Scholar
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1994). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning, Paper presented at the British Association of Applied Linguistics, Leeds 1994.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, cited in McNamara 1995.Google Scholar
Grice, H. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 67. Reprinted in Steinberg, D. & Jakobits, L. (1971) Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–9; cited in Levinson 1983.Google Scholar
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J., Syntax and semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J. (1984). Communicative competence revisited. Berkeley Science Report Series, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. & Swain, M. (1990). The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In Huxley, R. and Ingrams, E., (eds.), Language acquisition, models and methods. New York: Academic Press, 3–28.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J.B. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–93.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., Bongearts, T. & Poulisse, N. (1987). Strategy and system in L2 referential communication. In Ellis, R., Second language acquisition in context, Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 100–12.Google Scholar
Kennedy, B.L. (1988). Adult versus child acquisition: an information-processing approach. Language Learning, 38, 4, 477—95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 366–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R. (1993). International education and international competency in the United States. In Moore, S.J. & Morfit, C.A., (eds), Language and international studies: a Richard Lambert perspective. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center Monograph Series: 189–205.Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman, cited by Thomas 1983.Google Scholar
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning; 40, 3, 387–417.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T & McLeod, B (1983). Second language learning: an information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 2, 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. (1990). Assessing the language proficiency of health professionals. Unpublished PhD cited by Elder 1993.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1995). Modelling performance: opening Pandora's box. Applied Linguistics, 16, 2, 159–79.Google Scholar
Munby, J. 1978. Communicative syllabus design: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1991). Performance appraisal: an organisational perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
North, B. (1992). A European language portfolio: some options for a working approach to design scales of proficiency. In Council of Europe 1992 Transparency and coherence in language learning in Europe: objectives, assessment and certification – the proceedings of the Intergovernmental Symposium held at Rüschlikon November 1991 (ed. North, B.) Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 158–74. Reprinted in Schärer, R. & North, B., Towards a common European framework for reporting language competency, NFLC Occasional Paper. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center, April 1992.Google Scholar
North, B. (1994). Scales of language proficiency: a survey of some existing systems. Strasbourg: Council of Europe CC-LANG (94)24.Google Scholar
Oksaar, E. (1992). Intercultural communication in multicultural settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2, 1, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J.W. (1983) Issues in language testing research. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Parks, M.R. (1985). Interpersonal competence and the quest for personal competence. In Knapp, M.L. and Miller, G.L., Handbook of interpersonal communication, Beverley Hills, Calif. Sage, 171–201.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1992). Assessing second language acquisition through rapid profile. LARC Occasional Paper No 3. Feb 1992. Sydney: Language Acquisition Research Centre.Google Scholar
Sang, F., Schmitz, B., Vollmer, H.J., Baumert, J. & Roeder, P.M. (1986). Models of second language competence, a structural equation approach. Language Testing, 3, 1, 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savignon, S.J. (1972). Communicative competence. An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development, cited in e.g. Savignon 1983, Taylor 1988.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Laver, and Hutchinson, (eds.), Communication in face to face interaction, Penguin Modern Linguistics Readings, 374–405.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and acquisition of communicative competence, in Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, 137–74.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 129–58.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–85.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209–31.Google Scholar
Shaw, P. (1992). Variation and universality in communicative competence: Coseriu's Model. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 1, 9–25.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. (1981). Planes of discourse. Unpublished manuscript, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Reprinted 1983 in Rizvil, S.N.A.. (ed.), The two-fold voice: essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan. Salzburg: Salzburg Studies in English Literature, University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 2, 188—221.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1995a). Analysability, accessibility and ability for use. In Cook, G. & Seidlehofer, S. (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1995b). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 4, 542–66.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J.M. (1990). The genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983/1981). Some thoughts on the notion of ‘communication strategy’. In Faerch, and Kasper, 1983: 63–8 (originally published in TESOL Quarterly Sep 1981).Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability in interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, 142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. (1988). The meaning and use of the term ‘competence’ in linguistics and applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 9, 2, 148–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 1,91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upshur, J.A. & Homberg, T.J. (1983). Some relations among language tests at successive ability levels in Oiler (ed.) 1983, 188–202.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J.A. (1986). Objectives for foreign language teaching, Volume I: Scope. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J.A. & Trim, J.L.M. (1990). Threshold Level 1990. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, fainting and stretching in coils: oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 3, 489–508.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1979). The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 267–98.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1983). Contrasting schematic structures in service encounters. Applied Linguistics, 4, 3, 242–58.Google Scholar
Vollmer, H.J. (1981). Why are we interested in ‘general language proficiency’?. In Alderson, J.C. & Hughes, A. (eds.), Issues in language testing. ELT Doc 111. London: British Council, 152–76.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 128–37.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemann, J.M. & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative competence. Review of Educational Research 50, 1, 185–99.Google Scholar