Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:42:10.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Richard Coates
Richard Coates
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 2 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. (1972). Diphthongization. Language, 48, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. (1978). Vocalic and consonantal languages. In Duroviě, L. et al. . (eds.), Studia linguistica A. V. Issatchenko…⊙blata, 1–12. Lisse: de Riddes.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds.) (1974 a). Proceedings of the first international conferencae on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (1974b). Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1974). The organization of phonology. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1976). Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Language, 52, 326–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1980). Notes on the development of phonological theory. Language and Speech, 23, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.) (1973). A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. (1975). An introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1978). Review of S. Ohlander: Phonology meaning morphology Journal of Linguistics, 14, 93–7.Google Scholar
Árnason, Kr. (1980). Quantity in historical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1976). Phonology since generative phonology. Papiere zur Linguistik, 11, 5–19.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1977). Converging criteria for establishing consonantal marking values in different positions in the syllable. In Drachman, G. (ed), Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 3, 21–53.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1978). System of English intonation with gradient models. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1981). Theory, description and differences among linguists or what keeps linguistics from becoming (a science). Language and Communication, 1, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, H. (1977). The structure of the syllable and a proposed hierarchy of distinctive features. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 143–8.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H. (1978). On the use of ‘domains’ in phonology. In Dressler, W. and Meid, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, 763–6. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H. (1980). Report [on phonology, from the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Copenhagen, 1979]. = Phonology. Language and Speech, 23, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (1978 a). Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology. In Bell & Hooper (1978b), 3–22.Google Scholar
Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (eds.) (1978 b). Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. (1978). A general study of palatalization. In Greenberg (1978 b), 47–92.Google Scholar
Bjarkman, P. C. (1974). Rule order and Stampe's natural phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bjarkman, P. C. (1975). Toward a proper conception of processes in natural phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, 11, 60–72.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S. (1977). Fast speech as a function of tempo in natural generative phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broecke, M. v.d. (1976). Hierarchies and rank-orderings in distinctive features. Assen etc.: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamentals of phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (1974). Natural phonology from the diachronic vantage point. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology, pp. 43–80. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Haile, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper, Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1977). The autosegmental treatment of vowel harmony. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 111–19.Google Scholar
Coates, R. A. (1980). Time in phonological representations. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, R. A. (1982). Why Hungarian isn't as extrinsic as Vago thinks. Journal of Linguistics, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. & Fay, D. (forthcoming). One mental lexicon, phonologically arranged: comments on Hurford's comments. In Linguistic Inquiry, 13 (1982).Google Scholar
de, Chene B. & Anderson, S. R. (1979). Compensatory lengthening. Language, 55, 505–35.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1973). Les règles et lessons: introduction à la phonologie générative. Paris: Hermann (Collection Savoir).Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1980). Generative phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1977). Some formal and empirical issues in atomic phonology. Now in Goyvaerts (1979).Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1979 a). Atomic phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 31–49.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (ed.) (1979 b). Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1980). Phonological rules and phonetic explanation. Journal of Linguistics, 16, 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. & Eckman, F. (1978). Some substantive universals in atomic phonology. Lingua, 45, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donegan, P. J. & Stampe, D. (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 126–73.Google Scholar
Drachman, G. (1977). On the notion ‘phonological hierarchy’. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 85–102.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1972). Allegroregeln rechtfertigen Lentoregeln. Sekundäre Phoneme des Bretonischen. Innsbruck: lnstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1976). Methodisches zu Aliegro-Regeln. In Dressler & Mareš (1976), 219–34.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1979). External evidence for an abstract analysis of the German velar nasal. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 19, 3–27. Also in Goyvaerts (1979).Google Scholar
Dressler, W. & Mareš, F. (eds.) (1976). Phonologica 1972. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. & Pfeiffer, U. F. (eds.) (1977). Phonologica 1976 Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Dudas, K. (1974). A case of functional phonological opacity: Javanese elative formation. Studies in the linguistic sciences, 4, 91–111.Google Scholar
Durand, J. & Lyche, C. (1978). The s–ø alternation in French: a morphological solution. Journal of Linguistics, 14, 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, D. & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–20.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1972). Formant frequencies of long and short Danish vowels. In Firchow, E. S. (ed.), Studies for Einar Haugen. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1975). Trends in phonological theory. Copenhagen: Akademisk Foriag.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1978). Historical morphology. Proceedings of the Boszkowo conference. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, O. (ed.) (1974). Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T. (1975). On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. Lingua, 35, Similarly in Greenberg (1978 b), 9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T. (1979). Hierarchical relations among phonemic units as phonological universals. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), II, 9–15.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976 a). An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 23–68.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976 b). Autosegmental phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Now published as a Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1979).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1979). The aims of autosegmental phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 202–22.Google Scholar
Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.) (1979). Phonology in the 1970s. Ghent: Story-Scientia.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1978 a). Some generalisations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg (1978 b), 243–80.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (ed.) (1978 b). Universals of human language. II: phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffen, T. D. (1976). Towards a nonsegmental phonology. Lingua, 40, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, E. (1978). Explorations in abstract phonology. Lublin: Marie-Curie-Sklodowska University.Google Scholar
Gussmann, E. (1979). Abstract phonology arid psychological reality. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), 1, 101–7.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prologomena to a theory of word-formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4 3–16.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. (1974). Stfling. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hellberg, S. (1978). Unnatural phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 14, 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, L. (1980). When sounds go wild. Language, 56, 320–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language, 48, 525–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1974). Rule morphologisation in natural generative phonology. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 160–70.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1975). The archi-segment in natural generative phonology. Language, 51, 536–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1978). The link between markedness and rule naturalness. In Dressier, W. and Meid, W.. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists (Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft), 777–80.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. & Terrell, T. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: a natural generative analysis. Glossa, 10, 64–110.Google Scholar
Houlihan, K. & Iverson, G. K. (1979). Functionally-constrained phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 50–73.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1979). How different are they? In Dinnsen (1979 b), 252–64.Google Scholar
Howard, I. (1972). A directional theory of rule-application in phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Also Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Howard, I. (1975). Can the ‘elsewhere condition’ get anywhere? Language, 51, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, G. (1974). The representation of non-productive alternations. In Anderson and Jones (1974 a), 203–29.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. (1975). Suppletion in the representation of alternations. UCLA doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. (1980). Automatic alternations in non-transformational phonology. Language, 56, 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (1977). The significance of linguistic generalisations. Language, 53, 574–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. (1979). The sound shape of language. Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. D. (1971). Unbounded expressions in rules of stress and accent. Glossa, 4, 185–96.Google Scholar
Katamba, F. X. (1979). How hierarchical and universal is consonant strength? Theoretical linguistics, 6, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1979). The mystery of the tenth vowel. MS. To appear In Kaye, J. D. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds.), Non-superficial phonology.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. W. (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. W. (1979). Generative phonology. Description and theory. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1975). In defense of extrinsic ordering. In Koutsoudas (1976), 76–95.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Anderson, & Kiparsky, (1973), 93–106.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1974). How abstract in phonology? In Fujimura (1974), 5–56.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1975). Stress, syntax and meter. Language, 51, 576–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 189–248.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, J. (1978). French linking phenomena: a natural generative analysis. Language, 54, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (ed.) (1976). The application and ordering of grammatical rules. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1977). On the necessity of the morphophonemic-allophonic distinction. In Dressier and Pfeiffer (1977), 121–6.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1980). The question of rule-ordering: some common fallacies. Journal of Linguistics, 16, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Language, 50, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krohn, R. (1972). On the sequencing of tautosegmental features. Papers in Linguistics, 5, 114ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Anderson, J. M. (1975). Old, English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Now published as a Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1980).Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1976). The tones in English intonation. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 69–107.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1979). The phonological component as a parsing device. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 174–201.Google Scholar
Leben, W. & Robinson, O. (1977). ‘Upside-down’ phonology. Language, 53, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar
Lightner, T. M. (1975). The role of derivational morphology in a generative grammar. Language, 51, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindau, M. E. (1975). Features for vowels. UCLA doctoral dissertation. Also Ann Arbor: Xerox University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1979). Psychological reality in phonology: a theoretical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1974). Toward a production model of Spanish morphology: a further look at plurals. Studio linguistica, 28, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsien-Wilson, W. (1981). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In Simon, J. C. (ed.), Spoken language generation and understanding (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
Mensah, E. (1979). The nature of lingual consonants. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), I, 306.Google Scholar
Pagliuca, W. & Mowrey, R. (1890). On' certain evidence for the feature [grave]. Language, 56, 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellowe, J. & Jones, V. (1978). On intonational variability in Tyneside speech. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English (London: Arnold), 101–21.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1981). On the reapplication of morphological rules after phonological rules. Paper read to the Autumn Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (York).Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. (1973). Some implications of natural phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 530–41.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. (1974). Non-parametric environments in natural phonology. In Papersfrom the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 285–96.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. O. (1972). On arguments for rule-ordering. Foundations of Language, 8, 266–73.Google Scholar
Rosetti, A. (1963). Sur la théorie de la syllabe. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rudes, B. (1976). Lexical representations and variable rules in natural generative phonology. Glossa, 10, 111–50.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. (1974). The simplex feature hypothesis. Glossa, 8, 141–92.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1968). On the non-uniqueness of phonological representations. Language, 44, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1972). Natural rules in phonology. In Stockwell & Macaulay (1972), 199–229.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1974). How abstract is abstract? In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 297–317.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1979). Nonsegmental phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 303–9.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. & Bailey, C.-J. N. (eds.) (1973). Towards tomorrow's linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1975). The margins of morphophonemics. Journal of Linguistics, 11, 249–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1977). Modern phonology. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Stahlke, H. (1975). Some problems with binary features for tone. In Herbert, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on African Linguistics, 210–26.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Chicago doctoral dissertation. Now published ass Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1979). Occasionally referred to in the literature as How Ispent my summer vacation.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.) (1972). Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tench, P. (1976). Double ranks in a phonological hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 12, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1977). In support of extrinsic ordering. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderslice, R. & Ladefoged, P. (1972). Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word- accentuation rules. Language, 48, 819–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972 a). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte, 18, 1–18.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972 b). Rule inversion. Lingua, 29, 209–42.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972 c). Phonological uniqueness in natural generative grammar. Glossa, 6, 105–16.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1973). Phonological concreteness in natural generative grammar. In Shuy & Bailey (1973), 202–19.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974 a). Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 346–74.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974 b). Sanskrit suki and the concept of a natural class. Linguistics, 130, 91–7.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1978). Universal syllabic phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 5, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N. (1978). Words vs. morphemes in morphological change: the case of Italian -iamo. In Fisiak (1978).Google Scholar
Vogel, I. (1977). Length phenomena in Italian: support for the syllable. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 3, 600-9.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1976). Perception and production in the acquisition of phonology. In Raffler-Engel, W. von & Lebrun, Y. (eds.), Baby talk and infant speech. (Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger), 294–3022.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1977). Multivalued features for consonants. Language, 53, 843–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1972). Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In Stockwell & Macaulay (1972), 275–301.Google Scholar