Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:52:30.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Practitioners respond to Icy Lee's ‘Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2020

Yingying Li
Affiliation:
Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhu, China
Ye Han*
Affiliation:
Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: hanye@hit.edu.cn

Extract

In her position article, Lee (2019) compellingly argues for focused written corrective feedback (FWCF) and offers clear guidelines for teachers to shift their feedback approach. As English language teaching practitioners in Chinese universities, we share Lee's view against any unthinking adherence to comprehensive written corrective feedback (CWCF) and advocate principled feedback practice. Our response begins by presenting the common ground between Lee's and our stance, followed by problematizing her ‘less-is-more’ argument. Finally, following Lee's guidelines, we propose a few context-specific suggestions to help university teachers in mainland China and other contexts better implement FWCF.

Type
Pedagogical Implications
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Revisiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(3), 377399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524–5436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 84, 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar