Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:04:31.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research in progress: Applied linguistics at Northern Arizona University, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2020

Brett Hashimoto ,
Daniel Keller ,
Ekaterina Sudina ,
Katherine Yaw ,
Jesse Egbert  and
Luke Plonsky
Brett Hashimoto*
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
Daniel Keller
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
Ekaterina Sudina
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
Katherine Yaw
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
Jesse Egbert
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
Luke Plonsky
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: bjh376@nau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research in the News
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 227 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44, 95–137. doi:10.1177/0075424216628955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M. (2015). Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10, 11–45. doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D. (forthcoming). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. V., Plonsky, L., & Teimouri, Y. (2018). The use of course grades as metrics in L2 Research: A systematic review. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 763–778. doi:10.1111/flan.12370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, W. J. (forthcoming). Multiple perspectives on learner interaction: The corpus of collaborative oral tasks. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dalman, M., & Kang, O. (2019, September). TOEFL iBT speaking scores and U.S. undergraduates’ judgments of comprehensibility, accentedness, and acceptability. Paper presented at PSLLT 2019, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Baker, P. (2019). Using corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2016). Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14, 233–273. doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. (2015). Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1817–1831. doi:10.1002/asi.23308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & LaFlair, G. T. (2018). Statistics for categorical and distribution free data. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L. & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 523–539). New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Bootstrapping techniques. In Gries, S. T. & Paquot, M. (Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, B. J., & Nelson, K. (2020). Using a corpus in creating and evaluating a DCT. Applied Pragmatics, 2(1), 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Ahn, H., Moran, M., & Park, S. (forthcoming). Proficiency as a mediating variable of intelligibility for accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Kang, O., & Johnson, D. O. (2018a). Automated English proficiency scoring of unconstrained speech using prosodic features. Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, 2018–June (pp. 617–620). doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., & Johnson, D. O. (2018b). US Patent Serial No. 9,947,322. Systems and methods for automated evaluation of human speech.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Kermad, A., & Taguchi, N. (under review). An interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on prosody of L2 speech acts.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018a). Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English. Language Learning, 68, 115–146. doi:10.1111/lang.12270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018b). Which features of accent affect understanding? Exploring the intelligibility threshold of diverse accent varieties. Applied Linguistics, 1–29. doi:10.1093/applin/amy053Google Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2019). The effects of international accents and shared L1 on listening comprehension tests. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 56–81. doi:10.1002/tesq.463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, D. (under review). The effects of structural priming on L2 development: A meta-analysis.Google Scholar
Keller, D., & Dronjic, V. (under review). The psychological reality of registers: Evidence from a new priming paradigm.Google Scholar
Keller, D., & Kostromitina, M. (2020). Characterizing non-chain restaurants' Yelp star-ratings: Generalizable findings from a representative sample of Yelp reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, G. (under review). Paired-speaking tasks: The role of planning and its effects on speaking scores.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Plonsky, L., & Saito, K. (forthcoming). The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction. System.Google Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22, 319–344. doi:10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lovCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Data, open science, and methodological reform in second language acquisition research. In Gudmestad, A. & Edmonds, A. (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 219–228). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 861–904. doi:10.1017/S0142716418000036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAndrews, M. (2019). Short periods of instruction improve learners’ phonological categories for L2 suprasegmental features. System, 82, 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, T., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Reliability analyses: Estimating error in L2 research. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicklin, C., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Outliers in L2 research: A synthesis and data re-analysis from self-paced reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2018). The Bayesian revolution in second language research: An applied approach. Language Learning, 68, 1032–1075. doi:10.1111/lang.12310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2019). A Bayesian approach to measuring evidence in L2 research: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 103, 248–261. doi:10.1111/modl.12543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018a). Correlation and simple linear regression in applied linguistics. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L. & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 395–421). New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018b). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271. doi:10.1177/0267658316684904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2019). Recent research on language learning strategy instruction. In Chamot, A. U. & Harris, V. (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 3–21). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Quantitative research methods and the reform movement in applied linguistics. In Mohebb, H., & Coombe, C. (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R 2 values. Modern Language Journal, 102, 713–731. doi:10.1111/modl.12509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S., & Spinner, P. (forthcoming). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Sudina, E. (forthcoming). Second-language strategy instruction. In Mohebbi, H. & Coombe, C. (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. In Taguchi, N. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 287–307). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Measuring the effects of second language pronunciation teaching: A proposed framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning. doi:10.1111/lang.12345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J. (under review). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension: Does task type matter?Google Scholar
Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2018). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 320–347. doi:10.1002/tesq.482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudina, E., & Plonsky, L. (under review). Language-specific grit, achievement, and anxiety among L2 and L3 learners in Russia.Google Scholar
Sudina, E., Vernon, T., Foster, H., del Villano, H., Hernandez, S., Beck, D., & Plonsky, L. (under review). Introducing L2-Teacher Grit: Evidence of construct validity and reliability.Google Scholar
Tabandeh, F., Teimouri, Y., & Plonsky, L. (under review). (Paper comparing relative contributions of aptitude and L2 grit to L2 achievement).Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Development of pragmatic knowledge in L2 Chinese: Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a study abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 100, 775–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Youn, S-J. (forthcoming). Speaking in L2 pragmatics research. In Derwing, T., Munro, M. & Thompson, R. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and speaking.Google Scholar
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 363–387. doi:10.1017/S0272263118000311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teimouri, Y., Plonsky, L., & Tabandeh, F. (under review). L2 grit: Passion and perseverance for second-language learning.Google Scholar
Youn, S. (2020). Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels. Language Testing, 37(1), 76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youn, S., & Chen, S. (2019, March). Investigating raters’ scoring processes and strategies in paired speaking assessment. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Crawford, W. (under review). Attention to form in collaborative writing: Language related episodes in two task conditions.Google Scholar