Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:25:16.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speech Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Francis Nolan
Francis Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 14 , Issue 1-3 , January 1981 , pp. 73 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abberton, E. (1972). Visual feedback and intonation learning. In Rigault, A. & Charbonneau, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Abbs, J. H. & Sussman, H. M. (1971). Neurophysiological feature detectors and speech perception. A discussion of theoretical implications. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abbs, J. H. & Watkin, K. L. (1976). Instrumentation for the study of speech physiology. In Lass, N. J. (ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ades, A. E. (1974). A bilateral component in speech perception? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 610–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, A. E. (1976). Adapting the property detectors for speech perception. In Wales, R. J. & Walker, E. (eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Astin, R. N. & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Effects of early linguistic experience on speech discrimination by infants: a critique of Eilers, Gavin, & Wilson (1979). Child Development, 51, 107–12.Google Scholar
Atal, B. S. (1970). Determination of the vocal tract shape directly from the speech wave. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47, 65(A).Google Scholar
Bailey, P. J. (1973). Perceptual adaptation for acoustical features in speech. Speech Perception, 2,2, 29–34. Progress Report of the Department of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Benguerel, A.-P. & Cowan, H. A. (1974). Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French. Phonetica, 30, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bladon, R. A. W. & Nolan, F. J. (1977). A video-fluorographic investigation of tip and blade alveolars in English. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E. & Stevens, K. N. (1979). Acoustic invariance in speech production:evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1001–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogert, B. P. (1972). Practicing digital spectrum analysis. In David, E. E. & Denes, P. B. (eds.), Human communication: a unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. & Pisoni, D. B. (1970). Auditory vs. articulatory training in exotic sounds. Modern Language Journal, 54, 477–81.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. S., Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M., Borst, J. M. & Gerstman, L. J. (1952). Some experiments on the perception of synthethic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, W. E. (1974). Adaptation of phonetic feature analyzers for place of articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 616–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, W. E. (1975). Selective adaptation to speech. In Restle, E., Shiffrin, R. M., Castellan, J. N., Lindman, H. & Pisoni, D. B. (eds.), Cognitive theory, Vol. 1. Hillside, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E., Ebert, R. R. & Cole, R. A. (1976). Perceptual analysis of stop consonants and glides. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 92–104.Google Scholar
Daniloff, R. & Hammarberg, R. (1973). On defining coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M. & Cooper, F. S. (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 769–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilers, R. E., Gavin, W. J. & Wilson, W. R. (1979). Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: a cross-linguistic study. Child Development, 50, 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eimas, P. D., Cooper, W. E. & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Some properties of linguistic feature detectors. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 247–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P. D. & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimas, P. D. (1975). Speech perception in early infancy. In Cohen, L. B. & Salapatek, P. (eds.), Infant perception: from sensation to cognition, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D. & Miller, J. L. (1978). Selective adaptation in speech and visual perception. In Walk, R. D. & Pick, H. L. (eds.), Perception and experience. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Fabre, P. (1957). Un procédé électrique percutané d'inscription de l'accolement glottique au cours de la phonation: glottographie de haute fréquence. Premiers résultats. Bulletin de l'Académie National de Médecine, 141, 66–99.Google Scholar
Fallside, F. & Brooks, S. (1977). Some displays for computer analysed speech. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 124, 1227–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcin, A. J. & Abberton, E. (1971). First applications of a new laryngograph. Medical and Biological Illustration, 21, 172–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Fourcin, A. J. & Abberton, E. (1976). The laryngograph and the voiscope in speech therapy. In Loebell, E. (ed), Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Congress of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1977). Timing control in speech production. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R. E. & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Butterworth, B. (ed), Language Production, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fujimura, O., Tatsumi, I. & Kagaya, R. (1973). Computational processing of palatographic patterns. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, O., Baer, T. & Niimi, S. (1979). A stereo-fiberscope with a magnetic interlens bridge for laryngeal observation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 478–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gay, T. (1974). A cinefluorographic study of vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Stevens, K. N. (1964). Speech recognition: a model and a program for research. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, R. (1976). The metaphysics of coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 4, 353–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, W. (1972). The use of electropalatography in phonetic research. Phonetica, 25, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardcastle, W. (forthcoming). Electropalatography and its clinical applications. In Croatto, L. (ed.), Trattato di Foniatria. Rome: C. G. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche.Google Scholar
Harden, R. J. (1975). Comparison of glottal area changes as measured from ultrahigh-speed photographs and photoelectric glottographs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 728–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harshman, R., Ladefoged, P. & Goldstein, L. (1977). Factor analysis of tongue shapes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 693–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirose, H. (1977). Electromyography of the larynx and other speech organs. In Sawashima, M. & Cooper, F. S. (eds.), Dynamic aspects of speech production. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, H., Kiritani, S., Ushijima, T. & Kjellin, O. (1979). Lingual electromyography related to tongue movement in Swedish vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 317–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishizaka, K. & Flanagan, J. L. (1972). Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two-mass model of the vocal cords. Bell System Technical Journal, 51, 1233–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Moll, K. L. (1972 a). Cinefluorographic analysis of selected lingual consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 453–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Moll, K. L. (1972 b). Tongue body articulation during vowel and diphthong gestures. Folia Phoniatrica, 24, 286–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, R. D. (1976). Models of speech production. In Lass, N. J. (ed), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Minifie, F. D. (1977). Coarticulation in recent speech production models. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewley-Port, D. (1977). EMG signal processing for speech research. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-50, 123–46.Google Scholar
Kiritani, S., Itoh, K. & Fujimura, O. (1975). Tongue-pellet tracking by a computer-controlled x-ray microbeam system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, 1516–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiritani, S., Tateno, Y., Iinuma, T. & Sawashima, M. (1977). Computer tomography of the vocal tract. In Sawashima, M. & Cooper, F. S. (eds.), Dynamic aspects of speech production. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, V. A. & Chistovich, L. A. (1965). Speech: articulation and perception. (Translation) Washington, D. C.: Joint Publications Research Service, No. 30, 543.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (1979). The perception of speech in early infancy. In Lass, N. J. (ed.), Speech and language, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kydd, W. L. & Belt, D. A. (1964). Continuous palatography. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29, 489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, H. L. (1965). The motor theory of speech perception: a critical review. Psychological Review, 72, 275–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasky, R. E., Syrdal-Lasky, A. & Klein, R. E. (1975). VOT discrimination by four-to six-and-a-half-month-old infants from Spanish environments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 215–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. International Journal of American Linguistics, 30, 3.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, H. (forthcoming). Proceedings of the Conference on the Speech of the Hearing Impaired, CUNY 1979. City University of New York.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S. & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. G. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markel, J. D. & Gray, A. H. (1976). Linear prediction of speech. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. L. & Eimas, P. D. (1977). Studies on the perception of place and manner of articulation: a comparison of labial-alveolar and nasal-stop distinctions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 835–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, A. R. (1971). Consonant cue perception by 20- to 24-week-old infants. Child Development, 42, 717–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, K. L. & Daniloff, R. G. (1971). Investigation of the timing of velar movements during speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50, 678–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, P. A. (1972). The discrimination of speech and nonspeech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 477–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nearey, T. M. (1980). On the physical interpretation of vowel quality: cinefluorographic and acoustic evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 213–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. J. (1978). The ‘coarticulation resistance’ model of articulatorv control: solid evidence from English liquids? Nottingham Linguistics Circular, 7, 28–51.Google Scholar
Noll, A. M. (1967). Cepstrum pitch determination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, J. J. (1972). Physical models in phonology. In Rigault, A. & Charbonneau, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh international Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1976). A model of speech aerodynamics. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, 1, 93–107. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Öhman, S. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151- 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabiner, L. R. & Schafer, R. W. (1978). Digital processing of speech signals. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Roach, P. J. & Hardcastle, W. J. (1976). A computer system for the processing of electropalatographic and other articulatory data. Occasional Papers, 17. University of Essex Language Centre.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. A. (1977). Auditory perception of speech. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall.Google Scholar
Sawashima, M. (1977). Fiberoptic observation of the larynx and other speech organs. In Sawashima, M. & Cooper, F. S. (eds.), Dynamic aspects of speech production. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Scully, C. (1979). Model prediction and real speech: fricative dynamics. In Lindblom, B. & Öhman, S. (eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. J. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1978). Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1338–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, K. N. & Halle, M. (1967). Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In Wathen-Dunn, W. (ed), Models for the perception of speech and visual form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1972). Segments, features, and analysis by synthesis. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (eds.), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1975). The potential role of property detectors in the perception of consonants. In Fant, G. & Tatham, M. A. A. (eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Strange, W. & Jenkins, J. J. (1978). Role of linguistic experience in the perception of speech. In Walk, R. D. & Pick, H. L. (eds.), Perception and experience. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Streeter, L. A. (1976). Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259, 39–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S. & Cooper, F. S. (1970). Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. Psychological Review, 77, 234–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1976). Speech perception. In Lass, N. J. (ed), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1979). The beginnings of speech. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-58, 35–64.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Report on speech perception. Language and Speech, 23, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teston, B. (1976). Etude et réalisation d'un système d'analyse des paramètres articulatoires: le polyphonometre. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 3, 151–207.Google Scholar
Titze, I. R. (1973/1974). The human vocal cords: a mathematical model. Pt. I: Phonetica, 28, 129–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pt. II: Phonetica, 29, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakita, H. (1976). Instrumentation for the study of speech acoustics. In Lass, N. J. (ed), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wakita, H. & Fant, G. (1978). Toward a better vocal tract model. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 1/1978. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Wakita, H. (1979). Estimation of vocal tract shapes from acoustical analysis of the speech wave: the state of the art. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ASSP-27, 281–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakita, H. (1980). New Methods of analysis in speech acoustics. Phonetica, 37, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, D. W. (1976). Aerodynamics of speech production. In Lass, N. J. (ed), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wood, S. (1979). A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar