Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:09:09.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissecting analogical leveling quantitatively: The case of the innovative potential suffix in Tôkyô Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kenjirô Matsuda
Kenjirô Matsuda
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analogical leveling in progress of a potential suffix in Tôkyô Japanese is analyzed within a quantitative paradigm. The phenomenon, whereby an innovative potential and a conservative potential alternate, is shown through a multivariate analysis to be controlled by five factors: sociological variable complex, length of the verb stem, conjugation pattern of the verb, the following inflectional form, and embeddedness of the clause containing the suffix. Most of the linguistic constraints are observed crosslinguistically in language change or variation, giving further credibility to the analysis. Although traditional frequency-based theory of analogical leveling would predict stem frequency to be a possible factor, I demonstrate that it is not in this case. As a principled explanation for this apparent lack of contribution from frequency, the Revised Frequency Hypothesis is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen. (1974). The organization of phonology. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. (1982). Where's morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13:571–612.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. (1946a). Studies in colloquial Japanese: I. Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society 66:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. (1946b). Studies in colloquial Japanese: II. Syntax. Language 22:200–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (1985). Morphology: A study of relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Pagliuca, William, & Perkins, Revere. (1991). Back to the future. In Traugott, E. & Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalizaiton. Vol. II. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Chene, Brent. (1985). r-epenthesis and the Japanese verb. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 10:172–207.Google Scholar
de Chene, Brent. (1987). Keitai on'inron ni okeru sinriteki zituzaisei—nihongo no doosi no baai. In Ôtsu, Y. et al. (eds.), Kotoba kara mita kokoro. Tôkyô: Tôkyô University Press. 145–180.Google Scholar
de Chene, Brent. (1988). Japanese r-epenthesis and inflectional boundary buffer-segments. Paper given at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America,New Orleans,December 1988.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan. (1987). Kinship and collective activity in the Ngayarda languages of Australia. Language in Society 16:321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth. (1980). Variation in discourse and stuff like that. Language in Society 9:13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1980). The languages of Australia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the White community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven L. (1990). Vowel-zero alternations and syllable-counting morphology. Indiana Slavic Studies 5:79–96.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko. (1979). Casual speech vs. fast speech. In Clyne, P. et al. (eds.), The proceedings of the 15th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 126–137.Google Scholar
Hibiya, Junko. (1988). A quantitative study of Tokyo Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. (1986). Principles of historical linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morpho-phonemic change. In Christie, W. (ed.), Current trends in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 95–105.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara. (1985). Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Jutronić-Tihomirović, Dunja. (1987). Above phonology and below syntax in linguistic change. In Denning, K. et al. (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford, CA: Department of Liguistics, Stanford University. 249–265.Google Scholar
Kanda, Sumiko. (1961). Gendai Tookyoogo no kanoohyoogen ni tuite. Tookyoo Zyosidaigaku Nihon Bungaku 16 (1961):70–84.Google Scholar
Kanda, Sumiko. (1964). Mireru, dereru: Kanoohyoogen no ugoki. In Morioka, K. et al. (eds.), Yureteiru bunpoo (Koogo Bunpoo Kooza, Vol. 3). Tôkyô: Meiji Shoin. 81–91.Google Scholar
Katô, Kazuo. (1988). Gendai syutoken zyosidaisei ni okeru kanoo hyoogen siyoo no iti zittai. Wayoo Kokubun Kenkyuu 23:110–129.Google Scholar
Keino, Masaji. (1972). Doosi no kenkyuu. Tôkyô: Kasama Shoten.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko. (1942). Gagyoo bion ron. In Nihongo on'inron. Tôkyô: Hanawa Shobô.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology In Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 93–106.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1978). Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory. In Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. 218–236.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Yang, S.I. (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. (1973a). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. (1973b). Nihon bunpoo kenkyuu. Tôkyô: Taishûkan.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. (1983). Shin nihon bunpoo kenkyuu. Tôkyô: Taishûkan.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki. (1960). Gengo no kizyutu. Tôkyô: Kenkyûsha.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. (1949). La nature des procès dits «analogiques». Acta Linguistica 5:15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: The Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1978). Where does the linguistic variable stop? A response to Beatriz Lavandera. Sociolinguistic Working Paper 44. Southwest Education Development Laboratory, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (in press). Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1990). The differentiation of the sexes in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Final report on National Science Foundation contract NSF-GS-3287. Philadelphia: The U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Sankoff, Gillian (1988). The study of speech community. Workshop material distributed at the NWAVE-XVII Conference,Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, Kikuo, Ikuta, Satoshi, & Tokuhashi, Takeshi. (1990). Evaluating the validity and the efficiency of the so-called ‘guided responses’ of field linguistics. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. (1980). Laws of analogy. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical morphology. The Hague: Mouton. 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjirô. (1989). A Japanese inflectional leveling process in progress. Sophia Linguistica 27:227–235.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjirô. (in press). Linguistic constraints on analogical leveling. The proceedings of the 27th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
McCawley, James. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Minami, Fujio. (1974). Gendai nihongo no koozoo. Tôkyô: Taishûkan.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Michio. (1953). Koreru, mireru, tabereru nado to yuu iikata ni tuite no oboegaki. In Kindaichi Kyoosuke hakase kokikinen gengo minzoku ronsoo. Tôkyô: Sanseido. 579–594.Google Scholar
Nakata, Toshio. (1982). Kanoo hyoogen ni kansuru iti kensyoo: Gendai Tookyoo no kookoosei no tyoosa yori. Nihongo Kenkyuu 5:64–71.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony, & Lemle, Miriam. (1976). Syntactic diffusion. In Steever, S. et al. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 221–240.Google Scholar
National Language Research Institute. (1964). Gendai zassi 90 syu no yoogo yoozi. Vol. III. Tôkyô: Shûei Shuppan.Google Scholar
National Language Research Institute. (1981). Daitosi no gengo seikatu. Tôkyô: Shûei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Okazaki, Kazuo. (1980). Mireru, tabereru kata no kanoo hyoogen ni tuite: Gendai Tookyoo no tyuugakusei, kookoosei ni tuite okonatta hitotu no tyoosa kara. Gengo Seikatsu 340:64–70.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. (1890/1970). Principles of the history of language. Translated by Strong, H.. College Park, MD: McGrath.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, & Beckman, Mary. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poser, William. (1990). Evidence for foot structure in Japanese. Language 66:78–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Pascale, & Sankoff, David. (1978). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 57–69.Google Scholar
Sadohara, Hatasu. (1957). Kagoshima(si) hoogen doosino sobyoo. Kokugogaku 31:28–36.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, & Labov, William. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8:189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. (1973). Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, C.-J. & Shuy, R. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 44–62.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. (1974). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Sankoff, Gillian (ed.), The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 47–79.Google Scholar
Shibuya, Katsumi. (1990). Nihongo kanoohyoogen no syosoo to hatten. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ôsaka.Google Scholar
Statistics Bureau, Management and Coordination Agency. (1991). Japan statistical yearbook. Tôkyô: Japan Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter. (1988). On the mechanisms of morphological change. In Hammond, M. & Noonan, M. (eds.), Theoretical morphology. San Diego: Academic. 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter. (1982). Local and general markedness. Language 58:832–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuchiya, Shin'ichi. (1971). Tookyoogo no gohoo no yure: Zidoo seito gengo tyoosa hookoku (2). Bunken Geppoo 1971–9. 15–42.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Judith & Labov, William. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19:29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Fasold, Ralph. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Minoru. (1984). Kanoo doosino zittai: Hanasi kotoba ni okeru kanoo hyoogen no baai. In Suzuki, K. & Hayashi, O. (eds.), Kenkyuu siryoo nihon bunpoo. Vol. III (Yoogen hen (2)). Tôkyô: Meiji Shoin. 303–336.Google Scholar