Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:38:55.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Guy Bailey ,
Natalie Maynor  and
Patricia Cukor-Avila
Guy Bailey
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Natalie Maynor
Affiliation:
Mississippi State University
Patricia Cukor-Avila
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Determining the function of verbal -s in the Black English Vernacular (BEV) has been a major problem in sociolinguistics. Linguists have offered four answers to questions about the feature's origins and function, with -s seen as a case of hypercorrection, as a marker of durative/habitual aspect, as a variable marker of present tense (with the variation stemming from dialect mixture), and as a marker of historical present regardless of person and number. This article argues that confusion about -s results largely from four mistaken assumptions about it: (1) that -s did not exist in earlier varieties of BEV, (2) that the use of -s in the plural bears no relation to its use in the singular or to other processes such as the use of is as a plural or copula and auxiliary absence, (3) that -s has always functioned simply as a person/number marker in white vernaculars, and (4) that any role white vernaculars may have played in the variability of -s was a consequence of regional variation brought to the United States. This article addresses these assumptions by examining the function of -s, both in the singular and plural, and of plural is in the Cely Letters, written between 1472 and 1488, and by comparing the results to similar data in black and white vernaculars. The analysis shows that in the Cely Letters the presence of an NP subject strongly favors the occurrence of both singular and plural -s and also plural is. The same constraint operates on the same forms in older black and white vernaculars, and it affects copula and auxiliary absence as well. In the speech of younger blacks and whites, this constraint has begun to disappear as -s has become solely a marker of person/number agreement in white speech and as -s itself has disappeared in BEV.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , October 1989 , pp. 285 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Guy. (1987). Are black and white vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE XIV Panel Discussion. American Speech 62:32–40; 75–76.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy. (1989). Sociolinguistic constraints on language change and the evolution of are in Early Modern English. In Trahern, J. (ed.), Standardizing English: Essays in the history of language change (Tennessee Studies in Literature, 31). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. 158–171.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Bernstein, Cynthia. (1990). The idea of Black English. SECOL Review 14:1–24.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1985a). The present tense of be in southern black folk speech. American Speech 60:195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1985b). The present tense of be in white folk speech of the southern United States. English World-Wide 6:199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1987a). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1987b). The verbal -s inflection in earlier Black English. Paper presented at the South-eastern Conference on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Maynor, Natalie. (1988). Verbal -s in the Southern White Vernacular. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Ross, Garry. (1988). The shape of the superstrate: Morphosyntactic features of Ship English. English World-Wide 9:193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy & Schnebly, Cynthia. (1988). Auxiliary deletion in the Black English Vernacular. In Ferrara, K. et al. (eds.), Language change and contact (Texas Linguistic Forum, 30). 34–41.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. (1980). A re-examination of the Black English copula. In Labov, William (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 83–106.Google Scholar
Baugh, John. (1983). Black street speech. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Butters, Ron. (1987). Verbal -s as past time indication in various narratives. In McIntyre, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Linguistics Colloquium, University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
Butters, Ron. (1989). The death of Black English: Divergence and convergence in black and white vernaculars. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1988). A different approach to the study of verbal -s in the Black English Vernacular. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Curme, George. (1977). A grammar of the English language. Essex, CT: Verbatim.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hackenburg, Robert. (1973). Appalachian English: A sociolinguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Hanham, Allison. (ed.). (1975). The Cely Letters, 1472–1485 (Early English Text Society No. 273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. ([1909] 1949). A Modern English grammar. Part IV: Morphology. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, (forthcoming). Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Kroch, Anthony. (1989). The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf. Language Variation and Change 1:115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Sankoff, David. (1987). The Philadelphia story in the Spanish Caribbean. American Speech 62:291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1989). There's no tense like the present: Verbal -s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1:47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. (1989). American earlier Black English. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Elizabeth. (1986). Variation in southern urban English. In Montgomery, M. & Bailey, G. (eds.), Language variety in the South: Perspectives in black and white. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. 180–201.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). The relationship of white southern speech to Vernacular Black English. Language 50:498–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar