Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:06:26.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-generational vowel change in American English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

Ewa Jacewicz ,
Robert Allen Fox  and
Joseph Salmons
Ewa Jacewicz
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Robert Allen Fox
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Joseph Salmons
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines cross-generational changes in the vowel systems in central Ohio, southeastern Wisconsin, and western North Carolina. Speech samples from 239 speakers, males and females, were divided into three age groups: grandparents (66–91 years old), parents (35–51), and children (8–12). Acoustic analysis of vowel dynamics (i.e., formant movement) was undertaken to explore variation in the amount of spectral change for each vowel. A robust set of cross-generational changes in /ɪ, ɛ, æ, ɑ/ was found within each dialect-specific vowel system, involving both their positions and dynamics. With each successive generation, /ɪ, ɛ, æ/ become increasingly monophthongized and /ɑ/ is diphthongized in children. These changes correspond to a general anticlockwise parallel rotation of vowels (with some exceptions in /ɪ/ and /ɛ/). Given the widespread occurrence of these parallel chainlike changes, we term this development the “North American Shift,” which conforms to the general principles of chain shifting formulated by Labov (1994) and others.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 45 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel, & van Hout, Roeland. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116:3099–3107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agwuele, Augustine, Sussman, Harvey M., & Lindblom, Björn. (2008). The effect of speaking rate on consonant vowel coarticulation. Phonetica 65:194–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, Harold B. (1973–1976). The linguistic atlas of the Upper Midwest. 3 vols. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Andruski, Jean, & Nearey, Terrance. (1992). On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91:390–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, Matt. (forthcoming). Sound change and laryngeal height. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 45. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Bauer, Matt, & Parker, Frank. (2008). /æ/-raising in Wisconsin English. American Speech 83:403–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckford Wassink, Alicia, Wright, Richard A., & Franklin, Amber D. (2007). Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: An investigation of motherese, hyperspeech, and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers. Journal of Phonetics 35:363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 139–169.Google Scholar
Bigham, Douglas S. (2009). Correlation of the Low-Back Vowel Merger and TRAP-Retraction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):21–31. Available at: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/4.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2005). The Canadian shift in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 17:133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford, & Youssef, Amani. (1995). The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence. Language Variation and Change 7:209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., Pisoni, David, & de Jong, Kenneth. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118:1661–1676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, Felicity. (1999). Vowel change in Australian English. Phonetica 56:1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durian, David. (2009). A new perspective on vowel variation over the course of the 20th century in Columbus, OH [The Canadian shift in Columbus, part I]. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Durian, David (2010). Purely a chain shift?: The Canadian Shift in the US Midland [The Canadian shift in Columbus, part II]. Paper presented at the American Dialect Society annual meeting, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Durian, David, Dodsworth, Robin, & Schumacher, Jennifer. (2010). Convergence in blue-collar Columbus, Ohio, African American and White vowel systems? In Yaeger-Dror, M. & Thomas, E. (eds.), AAE speakers and their participation in local sound changes: A comparative study. Publications of the American Dialect Society, 94. Durham: Duke University Press. 161–190.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (2003). Vowel shifting in the southern states. In Nagle, S. & Sanders, S. (eds.), English in the Southern United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Sarah H., & Kewley-Port, Diane. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112:259–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Robert A. (1983). Perceptual structure of monophthongs and diphthongs in English. Language and Speech 26:21–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Robert A., & Jacewicz, Ewa. (2009). Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126:2603–2618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fridland, Valerie. (2002). The social dimension of the Southern Vowel Shift: Gender, age and class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5:233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garea, Lauren L. (2009). Cross-dialectal differences in vowel identification. BA honors thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. (2001). Small-town values and big-city vowels: A study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Publication of the American Dialect Society, 84. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J (2003). Investigating chain shifts and mergers. In Joseph, B. & Janda, R. (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 244–266.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J (2005). The Midwest and West. In Schneider, E. (ed.), Handbook of varieties of English: The Americas and Caribbean, Vol I: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 338–350.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Kleber, Felicitas, & Reubold, Ulrich. (2008). Compensation for coarticualtion, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123:2825–2835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J., & Wheeler, Kimberlee. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97:3099–3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, James, Clark, Michael, & Nearey, Terrance. (2001). Effects of consonantal environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109:748–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans H. (1991). Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd ed.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, Terry L. (2007a). The Southern Shift in Appalachian English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2):121–134. Available at: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwplGoogle Scholar
Irons, Terry L (2007b). On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19:137–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001). Principles of linguistic change. II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83:344–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (2010). Principles of linguistic change. III: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linblom, Björn, Agwuele, Augustine, Sussman, Harvey, M., & Cortes, Elisabet E. (2007). The effect of emphatic stress on consonant vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121:3802–3813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobanov, Boris. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49:606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Corrine. (2009). The Northern Cities Shift in real time: Evidence from Chicago. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2):99–110. Available at: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/12.Google Scholar
Milenkovic, Paul. (2003). TF32 software program. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Nearey, Terrance, & Assmann, Peter. (1986). Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80:1297–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (2003). Where are the dialects of American English at anyhow? American Speech 78:235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas. (2008). Pre-velar raising and its conditioning environments: Role of labial and anterior tongue gestures. American Speech 83:373–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas (2010). The vowel phonology of urban southeastern Wisconsin. AAE speakers and their participation in local sound changes: A comparative study. Publications of the American Dialect Society, 94, Durham: Duke University Press. 191–217.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. (1876). Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie: Zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (Later, beginning with the widely cited 1881 edition, known as Grundzüge der Phonetik.)Google Scholar
Sledd, James. (1966). Breaking, umlaut, and the southern drawl. Language 42:18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. (1989). Vowel changes in Columbus, Ohio. Journal of English Linguistics 22:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R (2001). An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R (2003). Secrets revealed by Southern vowel shifting. American Speech 78:150–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R (2006). Evidence from Ohio on the evolution of /æ/. In Murray, T. E. & Simon, B. L. (eds.), Language variation and change in the American Midland: A new look at “heartland” English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik, & Kendall, Tyler. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available at: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/.Google Scholar
Torgersen, Eivind, & Kerswill, Paul. (2004). Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: Dialect levelling outcomes for an English vowel shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (2004). New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Catherine I., & Harrington, Jonathan. (1999). Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106:458–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, Catherine I., Maclagan, Margaret, & Harrington, Jonathan. (2000). Acoustic evidence for vowel change in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 12:51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic. (2000). Phonetic parallels between the close-mid vowels of Tyneside English: Are they internally or externally motivated? Language Variation and Change 12:69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar