Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:40:10.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of language shift on Sanapaná vowels: An exemplar-based perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2022

Jens E. L. Van Gysel
Jens E. L. Van Gysel*
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jelvangysel@unm.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the first sociophonetic study of Sanapaná (Enlhet-Enenlhet), spoken by around one thousand people in Paraguay. It examines the effects of L2 (Spanish/Guaraní) fluency and loss of L1 exposure on vowel quality and within-category variability of /e, o/ productions in the Sanapaná /e, a, o/ system. Data from eleven native Sanapaná speakers suggest that age and multilingualism may have little explanatory power by themselves. Speakers living in a majority-L2 environment show greater within-category variability and increased convergence of /e, o/ toward the L2 high vowels /i, u/ than daily users of Sanapaná. This suggests that decreased L1 exposure is the main factor driving language shift-related change in Sanapaná. I explain these findings in an exemplar-theoretic framework. Although the number of speakers sampled is limited, these data provide a valuable addition to our knowledge of sociolinguistic variation in small, underrepresented communities.

Keywords

SanapanáEnlhet-EnenlhetExemplar TheoryLanguage ContactLanguage ShiftMultilingualismSociophoneticsUsage-Based Linguistics
Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 107 - 135
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avelino, Heriberto. (2018). Mexico City Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48:223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baese-Berk, Melissa M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 81:981–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Steven, Bojesen, Rune H., Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Scheipl, Fabian, Grotendieck, Gabor, Green, Peter & Fox, John. (2019). Lme-4 version 1.1-19: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4.Google Scholar
Bird, Sonya. (2008). An exemplar dynamic approach to language shift. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53:387–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, & Muntzel, Martha. (1989). The structural consequences of language death. In Dorian, N. (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casserly, Elizabeth D., & Pisoni, David B. (2010). Speech perception and production. WIREs Cognitive Science 1:629–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Peiyao, & Marian, Viorica. (2017). Bilingual spoken word recognition. In Gaskell, G. and Mirkovic̆, J. (Eds.), Speech perception and spoken word recognition, 143–63. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, Eung-Do. (1989). Is phonology going haywire in dying languages? Phonological variations in Chipewyan and Sarcee. Language in Society 18:235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, Esther, Stockall, Linnaea, Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, Dimitra, & Gorba Masip, Celia. (2021). Illusory vowels in Spanish-English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research 37:587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DGEEC Dirección General de Estadística, Encuestas y Censos. (2012). Atlas de comunidades de pueblos indígenas en Paraguay 2012. Familia lingüística lengua maskoy. Asunción: DGEEC.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin. (2013). Retreat from the Southern Vowel Shift in Raleigh, NC: Social factors. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19:31–40.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. (1973). Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49:413–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. (1994). Varieties of variation in a very small place: Social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70:631–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, John. (2021). A grammar of Enxet Sur. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i.Google Scholar
Elliott, Stuart W., & Anderson, John R. (1995). Effect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21:815–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Flege, James Emil. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15:47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues. Timonium, MD: York Press. 229–73.Google Scholar
Gomes, Antonio Almir Silva. (2013). Sanapaná uma lingua Maskoy: Aspectos gramaticais. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Grabski, Krystyna, Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Lamalle, Laurent, Villain, Coriandre, Vallée, Natalie, Baciu, Monica, Le Bas, Jean-François, & Sato, Marc. (2013). Shared and distinct neural correlates of vowel perception and production. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26:384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Frank E. (2019). Regression Modeling Strategies. R package version 6.2-0.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit, & Schneider-Blum, Gertrud. (2014). Tabaq: In a state of flux. Dotawo: A Journal of Nubian Studies, 1:63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, Charles E. (1997). Dialect death: The case of Brule Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Christie, W. (ed.), Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland. 96–105.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith, Flemming, Edward, & Wright, Richard. (1993). The hyperspace effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69:505–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan. (2019). Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 48:685–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Judith F., Bogulski, Cari A., & McClain, Rhonda. (2012). Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism. The course and consequence of cross-language competition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review 99:22–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, William. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:205–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F. H., Matthies, M. L., Menard, L., Perkell, J. S., Stockmann, E., Tiede, M., Vick, J., & Zandipour, M. (2005). Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118:1636–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liljencrants, Johan, & Lindblom, Bjorn. (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48:839–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn, & Moon, S-J. (1989). Formant undershoot in clear and citation-form speech: A second progress report. KTH Speech, Music, and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report 30:121–23.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian, Avelino, Heriberto, & O'Connor, Loretta. (2009). The phonetic structures of Oaxaca Chontal. International Journal of American Linguistics 75:69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, Roy. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, A. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological, and linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 463–78.Google Scholar
Manuel, Sharon Y. (1990). The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. In Studdert-Kennedy, M. (Ed.), Status report on speech research, July-December 1990. New Haven, CT: Haskins Laboratories. 1–20.Google Scholar
Marian, Viorica, & Spivey, Michael. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6:97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Steven, McCloy, Daniel, & Wright, Richard, Eds. (2014). PHOIBLE Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://phoible.org. Accessed 09 March 2019.Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119:2382–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquale, Michael. (2009). Phonological variation in a Peruvian Quecha speech community. In Stanford, J. N., and Preston, D. R. (Eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Silva, Jorge Iván. (2017). La adquisición de oposiciones en bilingües castellano-quechua y quechua-castellano. Lexis 41:149–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. A., Engelbrecht, S. E., Busche, M. M., & Loukopoulos, L. D. (1993). A model for reaching control. Acta Psychologica 82:237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Boë, Louis-Jean, Vallée, Natalie, & Abry, Christian. (1997). Major trends in vowel system inventories. Journal of Phonetics 25:233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N. (2008). A socio-tonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change 20:409–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. (2011). Sociophonetics: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R., & Kendall, Tyler. (2017). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Online: http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1.php.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, & Travis, Catherine E. (2018). Bilingualism in the community. Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourville, Jason A., Reilly, Kevin J., & Guenther, Frank H. (2008). Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. NeuroImage 39:1429–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traunmüller, Hartmut. (1997). Auditory scales of frequency representation. Online: https://www2.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/bark.htm.Google Scholar
Unruh, Ernesto, & Kalisch, Hannes. (1997). Moya'ansaeclha’ nengelpayvaam nengeltoma enlhet. Biblioteca Paraguaya de Antropología, Vol. XXVII. Ya'alve-Saanga: Comunidad Enlhet.Google Scholar
Vallée, Nathalie. (1994). Systèmes vocaliques: De la typologie aux predictions. Doctoral dissertation, Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Van Gysel, Jens E. L. (2017). Temporal predicative particles in Sanapaná and the Enlhet-Enenlhet language family (Paraguay): A descriptive and comparative study. MA Thesis, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Van Gysel, Jens E. L. (2020). A documentation of historical narratives amongst the Sanapaná (Enlhet-Enenlhet) of the Paraguayan Chaco. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/2196/7aa154dd-cfb0-4850-a690-d7c0c9e81634.Google Scholar
Villagra, Rodrigo, & Bonifacio, Valentina. (2015). Los maskoy de Puerto Casado y los angaité de Puerto Pinasco. Un recuento de los tiempos del tanino. In Córdoba, L., Bossert, F., & Richard, N. (Eds.), Capitalismo en las selvas. Enclaves industriales en el Chaco y Amazonía indígenas (1850–1950). San Pedro de Atacama: Ediciones del Desierto. 233–70.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B. (2004). Category competition drives contrast maintenance within an exemplar-based production/perception loop. Proceedings of the Workshop of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology (SIGPHON), Barcelona, July 2004.Google Scholar