Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:35:56.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irregular plurals in Brazilian Portuguese: An exemplar model approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Ana Paula Huback
Ana Paula Huback
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses a group of Brazilian Portuguese plurals that end with the nasal diphthong [–ão] in their singular form. When pluralized, these words can take three plural forms: [–ões], [–ãos], or [–ães]. Each of these words has an etymological source that defines which morpheme should be applied to the plural form. However, in some cases, a different plural form is used instead of the etymological one. A set of psycholinguistic experiments was carried out with Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The goal was to analyze whether token or type frequency affects the choice of plural form for these words. The results show an interaction between type and token frequency, in the sense that type frequency serves as the basis for analogy, and token frequency can determine which words will be affected by the variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 245 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2002). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Janda, R. & Joseph, B. (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 602–623.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, & Eddington, David. (2006). A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language 82:323–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, & Scheibman, Joanne. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37:575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corpus do Português. Available at: http://www.corpusdoportugues.org/x.asp.Google Scholar
Corpus LAEL Fala (Linguística Aplicada a Estudos da Linguagem. Available at: http://lael.pucsp.br/corpora/index.htm.Google Scholar
Dicionário Eletrônico Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. (2001). Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, K. & Mullenix, J. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press. 145–165.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith, & Mullenix, John. (Eds.). (1997). Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pagliuca, William, & Mowrey, Richard. (1987). Articulatory evolution. In Ramat, A. G., Carruba, O., & Bernini, G. (eds.), Papers from the 7 th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2000). What people know about sounds of language. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29:111–120.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hooper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (eds.), Probability linguistics. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. 177–228.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4:328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 27–47.Google Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira. (1988). Reanálise da concordância nominal em português. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar