Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:50:18.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The variable deletion of unstressed vowels in Faialense Portuguese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

David James Silva
David James Silva
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Arlington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To verify anecdotal claims regarding the nature of unstressed vowel deletion in Azorean (European) Portuguese, conversational data from a native speaker of the island of Faial have been analyzed to determine the segmental and prosodic contexts favoring elision. Results of a quantitative analysis indicate that unstressed [u] and schwa are the most likely vowels to be deleted; moreover, deletion is highly favored when the unstressed vowel occurs in word-final position at the end of an utterance. Factors such as rhythmic preservation, syllable structure, and functional load are discounted in the analysis, suggesting that vowel deletion is essentially a word-based variable process in the language.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , October 1997 , pp. 295 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Camara, João M. (1972). The Portuguese language (Anthony, Naro, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J., & Simoneau, L. (1985). La chute des voyelles fermées en français de Montréal: As-tu entendu la belle syncope? In Cedergren, H. & Lemieux, M. (Eds.), Les tendances dynamiques du français à Montréal, vol. 1. Montréal: Office de la Langue Française. 55–144.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J., Levac, L., Perreault, H., & Sosa, J. M. (1991). Prosodic hierarchy and temporal variability in Montreal French. Paper presented at LabPhon 3, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. (1987). The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4: 109–149.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Ismael de Lima. (1958). Pontos de gramática histórica (4th ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Acadêmica.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (Ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic. 1–36.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13:227–276.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. (1985). Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
Krakow, Rena A., Beddor, Patrice S., Goldstein, Louis M., & Fowler, Carol A. (1988). Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83: 1146–1158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, Mark, & Prince, Alan. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8:249–336.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira. (1982). Aspectos da fonologia portuguesa. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Investigção Cientffica.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira, & Delgado, Martins, Maria, Raquel. (1982). Contribuição para o estudo das vogais átonas ['] e [u] no português europeu. Biblos 58:111–125.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira, Brito, Ana Maria, Duarte, Inês Silva, & Faria, Isabel Hub. (1983). Gramática da língua portuguesa. Coimbra: Livraria Almedina.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, & Vogel, Irene. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Stephen. (1988). Portuguese. In Harris, Martin & Vincent, Nigel (Eds.), The Romance languages. New York: Oxford University Press. 131–169.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Walker, Douglas. (1986). Going Through (L) in Canadian French. In Sankoff, David (Ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Francis M. (1948). Insular Portuguese pronunciation: Porto Santo and Eastern Azores. Hispanic Review 16:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Francis M. (1949). Insular Portuguese pronunciation: Central and Western Azores. Hispanic Review 17:47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Francis M. (1979). Atlantic islanders of the Azores and Madeiras. North Quincy, MA: The Christopher Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, & Rand, D. (1988). GoldVarb: A variable rule application for the MacIntosh, Version 1.6. Centre de recherches mathématiques. University de Montreal.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relationship between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3:371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1987). On the nature of prosodic constituency: A comment on Beckman and Edwards. In Beckman, M. & Kingston, J. (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 179–200.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth, & Tateishi, Koichi. (1988). Constraints on minor phrase formation in Japanese. Proceedings of CLS 24:316–336.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth, & Tateishi, Koichi. (1991). Syntax and Downstep in Japanese. In Georgopoulos, Carol & Ishihara, Roberta (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, David James. (1986). New perspectives on the Portuguese vowel shift. A.B. Honors Thesis, Harvard College, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1988). Sociolinguistic variance of low vowels in Azorean Portuguese. In Ferrara, K., Brown, B., Walters, K., & Baugh, J. (Eds.), Linguistic change and contact: Proceedings of NWAV-XVI. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics. 336–344.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1989). Determining the domain for intervocalic stop voicing in Korean. In Kuno, S., Whitman, J., Kang, Y.-S., Lee, I.-H., Bak, S.-Y., & Kim, Y.-J. (Eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Cambridge: Harvard University, Department of Linguistics. 177–188.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1992). The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Ithaca, NY: DMLL Publications.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1996). Mudanças Vocáliças e Identidade Social em Nordeste (São Miguel, Açores). Paper presented at the Special Conference on Sociolinguistics organized by RC 25 (Research Committee on Sociolinguistics) of the International Sociological Association in conjunction with the Social Sciences Research Council of the University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.Google Scholar
Silva, David James. (1997). Vowel lenition in São Miguel Portuguese. Unpublished manuscript. University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Teyssier, Paul. (1980). Histoire de la langue portugaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Walters, Susan G. (1994). Primary stress assignment in Brazilian Portuguese. In Herring, Susan & Paolillo, John (Eds.), University of Texas at Arlington Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 1. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington, Program in Linguistics. 69–78.Google Scholar