Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:41:27.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cryogenic setup for MJ class laser targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

A. S. Rybakov ,
E. I. Demikhov ,
E. A. Kostrov ,
V. S. Litvin ,
N. M. Sobolevsky ,
L. N. Latysheva  and
N. G. Borisenko
A. S. Rybakov
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia
E. I. Demikhov
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia
E. A. Kostrov
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia
V. S. Litvin
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60-letiya Oktyabrya prospekt 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia
N. M. Sobolevsky
Affiliation:
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60-letiya Oktyabrya prospekt 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia
L. N. Latysheva
Affiliation:
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60-letiya Oktyabrya prospekt 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia
N. G. Borisenko*
Affiliation:
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: N. G. Borisenko, P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russia. E-mail: ngbor@lebedev.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cryogenic system for maintaining a target at a constant temperature in the range 5–25 K after shutting off the pulse tube (PT) cryogenic refrigerator is developed and tested. The temperature stability at the sample is ±2 mK for at least 20 hours. The cryogenic setup consists of cryostat, PT cryocooler, liquid helium vessel, helium gas supply, thermo-radiation shield, thermal resistance. The system provides 0.25 W of cooling power at the target. The appropriate thermal resistance should be used for different temperatures. The designed operation mode is 3 minutes off and 15 minutes on. The deactivation of PT cryocooler allows to achieve the target position stability of 1 micrometer or less during the X-ray characterization. The effect of neutron-shield was estimated using Monte-Carlo simulation.

Keywords

Cryogenic targetlaser focusmK temperature stabilityneutron shieldsub-micron vibrations
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 25 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allweins, K, Qiu, LM and Thummes, G (2008) Damping of intrinsic temperature oscillations in a 4 K pulse tube cooler by means of rare earth plates. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 53A and 53B, 109–116.Google Scholar
Bagdinov, AV, Demikhov, EI, Kostrov, EA, Lysenko, VV, Piskunov, NA, Rybakov, AS and Tysyachnykh, YV (2018) Performance test of 1.5 T cryogen-free orthopedic MRI magnet. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 28, Article number: 4400704, 1–4.Google Scholar
Basov, NG and Krokhin, ON (1964) Conditions for heating up of a plasma by the radiation from an optical generator. Soviet Physics JETP 19, 123–125.Google Scholar
Demikhov, EI, Kostrov, EA, Lysenko, VV, Piskunov, NA and Troitskiy, VF (2010) 8 T cryogen free magnet with a variable temperature insert using a heat switch. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 20, 612–615.Google Scholar
Demikhov, TE, Kostrov, EA, Lysenko, VV, Demikhov, EI and Piskunov, NA (2012) 9 T NbTi cryogen free HTS test stand. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 22, Article number: 9501004, 1–4.Google Scholar
Demikhov, EI, Demikhov, TE, Kostrov, EA, Lysenko, VV and Piskunov, NA (2014) 2 T/5 T Two-Axis Cryogen Free Superconducting Vector Magnet With Variable Temperature Space, 11th European conference on applied superconductivity (EUCAS2013), PTS 1-4, Journal of Physics Conference Series. 507, Number of Paper: 032027.Google Scholar
Duderstadt, JJ and Moses, GA (1982) Inertial Confinement Fusion. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
General Atomics Report GA–A23852.Google Scholar
Gibson, CR, Charmin, CM, Del Bene, JV, Hoffmann, EH, Besenbruch, GE and Anteby, I (1998) Design of the fill/transfer station cryostat for the Omega cryogenic target system. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 43, 605–611.Google Scholar
Green, MA and Witte, H (2008) The use of small coolers in a magnetic field. AIP Conference Proceedings 985, 1299.Google Scholar
Haid, BJ (2006) Helium pot system for maintaining sample temperature after cryocooler deactivation. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 51A and B, 147–155.Google Scholar
Harding, DR, Elasky, LM, Verbridge, S, Weaver, A and Edgell, DH (2004) Formation of deuterium-ice layers in OMEGA targets. LLE Review Quarterly Report 99, 160.Google Scholar
Ikushima, Y, Li, R, Tomaru, T, Sato, N, Suzuki, T, Haruyama, T, Shintomi, T and Yamamoto, A (2008) Ultra-low-vibration pulse-tube cryocooler system – cooling capacity and vibration. Cryogenics 48, 406–412.Google Scholar
Konobeevsky, ES, Latysheva, LN and Sobolevsky, NM (2010) Computer simulation of an extracted beam for the neutron generator of the Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 74, 443–446.Google Scholar
Konobeevsky, ES, Latysheva, LN, Sobolevsky, NM and Ilić, RD (2011) Optimizing the collimator/shielding configuration of the NG-430 neutron generator. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 75, 449–453.Google Scholar
Masuyama, S and Fujita, N (2008) A simple method of temperature smoothing for a 4 K Gifford-McMahon refrigerator. Proceedings of the 22nd International Cryogenic Engineering Conference Seoul, pp. 69–75.Google Scholar
Naumov, PG, Lyubutin, IS, Frolov, KV and Demikhov, EI (2010) Closed loop cryostat for optical and Mössbauer spectroscopy in the temperature range 4.2–300 K. Instruments and Experimental Techniques 5, 158–164.Google Scholar
Ohtani, Y, Hatakeyama, H, Nakagome, H, Usami, T, Okamura, T and Kabashima, S (1999) Development of high efficiency 4 K GM refrigerator. Cryocoolers 10, 581–589.Google Scholar
Okidono, K, Oota, T, Kurihara, H, Sumida, T, Nishioka, T, Kato, H, Matsumura, M and Sasaki, O (2012) Temperature oscillation suppression of GM, Cryocooler. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 400, 052026.Google Scholar
Rybakov, AS, Bagdinov, AV, Demikhov, EI, Kostrov, EA, Lysenko, VV, Piskunov, NA and Tysyachnykh, YV (2016) 1.5 T cryogen free superconducting magnet for dedicated MRI. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 26, Number of paper: 4400403, 1–4.Google Scholar
Sangster, TC, et al. (2007) Cryogenic DT and D2 targets for inertial confinement fusion. Physics of Plasmas 14, 058101.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Wellenburg, P and Zimmer, O (2006) Helium liquefaction with a commercial 4 K Gifford-McMahon cryocooler. Cryogenics 46, 799–803.Google Scholar
Thummes, G, Wang, C and Heiden, C (1998) Small scale 4He liquefaction using a two stage 4 K pulse tube cooler. Cryogenics 38, 337–342.Google Scholar
Tomaru, T, Suzukia, T, Haruyamaa, T, Shintomia, T, Yamamotoa, A, Koyamab, T and Lib, R (2004) Vibration analysis of cryocoolers. Cryogenics 44, 309–317.Google Scholar
Wang, C (2009) Small Scale Helium Liquefaction Systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 150, 012053.Google Scholar
Xu, MY, de Waele, ATAM and Ju, YL (1999) A pulse tube refrigerator below 2 K. Cryogenics 39, 865–869.Google Scholar