Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:02:31.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Femtosecond laser induced two-photon absorption in Au-ion embedded glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Rabia Ahmad ,
M. Shahid Rafique ,
Ammar Ahmed ,
Ali Ajami ,
Pavla Nekvindova ,
Blanka Svecova ,
Shazia Bashir  and
Saman Iqbal
Rabia Ahmad*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Engineering & Technology, 54000 G. T. Road, Lahore, Pakistan
M. Shahid Rafique
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Engineering & Technology, 54000 G. T. Road, Lahore, Pakistan Institute of Applied Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Huaptstrasse 8-10 Wien-1040, Austria
Ammar Ahmed
Affiliation:
Amido, 43 Worship St, London EC2A 2DW, UK
Ali Ajami
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, Semnan University, 35131-19111 Semnan, Iran
Pavla Nekvindova
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic
Blanka Svecova
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic
Shazia Bashir
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Studies in Physics Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Saman Iqbal
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Engineering & Technology, 54000 G. T. Road, Lahore, Pakistan
*
Author for correspondence: Rabia Ahmad, 22-A, Askari-V, Gulberg-III, Lahore, Pakistan. E-mail: rabia.amd@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two-photon absorption (TPA) of Au-ion irradiated glasses in the femtosecond regime has been analyzed by an open-aperture Z scan technique. Three types of glasses, namely GIL49, BK7, and Glass B were irradiated by using 1700 keV Au+ ion beams. Samples were post-annealed at 600°C for 5 h. Penetration depth and distribution of Au+ ions having 1700 keV energy within glass substrates were estimated by transport of ions in matter (TRIM) simulations. Detailed calculations with full-damage cascades were performed for each sample, taking into account the chemical composition of glass substrates. TRIM results reveal that there is no significant change in ion range, straggling, and ion distribution with the change in the substrate composition. However, Z scan results showed a difference in TPA coefficients for all three glasses. Extent of crosslinking within each of irradiated sample, owing to its chemical composition, may have affected their TPA coefficients.

Keywords

Ion irradiationion–matter interactionopen-aperture Z scantwo-photon absorptionultrafast laser–matter interaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abed, Y, Mostaghni, F and Shafikhani, H (2016) Investigation of the nonlinear optical properties of the salen-H2 ligand using z-scan technique. IIOAB Journal 7, 293–297.Google Scholar
Ahmad, R, Rafique, MS, Tahir, MB and Malik, H (2014) Implantation of various energy metallic ions on aluminium substrate using a table top laser driven ion source. Laser and Particle Beams 32, 261–270.Google Scholar
Ajami, A, Husinsky, W, Liska, R and Pucher, N (2010) Atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and nonlinear absorption properties of femtosecond laser irradiated CR-39. Applied Physics A 101, 551–554.Google Scholar
Ajami, A, Gruber, P, Tromayer, M, Husinsky, W, Stampfl, J, Liska, R and Ovsianikov, A (2015) Saturable absorption of silver nanoparticles in glass for femtosecond laser pulses at 400 nm. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 426, 159–163.Google Scholar
Ajami, A, Husinsky, W, Tromayer, M, Gruber, P, Liska, R and Ovsianikov, A (2017) Measurement of degenerate two-photon absorption spectra of a series of developed two-photon initiators using a dispersive white light continuum z-scan. Applied Physics Letters 111, 071901–1–4.Google Scholar
Almeida, JMP, Almeida, GFB, Boni, L and Mendonça, CR (2015) Nonlinear optical properties and femtosecond laser micromachining of special glasses. Brazilian Chemical Society 26, 2418–2429.Google Scholar
Armani, AM, Shen, X, Choi, H, He, J, Dlep, V and Soltani, S (2018) Nonlinear optics in hybrid organic-inorganic ultra high Q integrated microcavities. Proceeding of OSA IPRSN IM31, IM31.4.Google Scholar
Carvalho, DO, Kassab, LRP, Del Cacho, VD, Da Silva, DM and Alayo, MI (2018) A review on pedestal waveguides for low loss optical guiding, optical amplifiers and nonlinear optics applications. Journal of Luminescence 203, 135–144.Google Scholar
Correa, AA, Kohanoff, J, Artacho, E, Portal, DS and Caro, A (2012) Non adiabatic forces in ion solid-interaction: the initial stages of radiation damage. Physical Review Letters 108, 213201.Google Scholar
Fang, R, Zhang, D, Wei, H, Li, Z, Yang, F and Gao, Y (2010) Improved two-temperature model and its application in femtosecond laser ablation of metal target. Laser and Particle Beams 28, 157–164.Google Scholar
Hainfeld, JF, Slatkin, DN and Smilowitz, HM (2004) The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Physics in Medicine and Biology 49, N309-15.Google Scholar
Huang, X, El-Sayed, IH, Qian, W and El-Sayed, MA (2006) Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in near-infrared region by using gold nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 128, 2115–2120.Google Scholar
Kanapathipillai, M (2006) Nonlinear absorption of ultrashort laser pulses by clusters. Laser and Particle Beams 24, 9–14.Google Scholar
Khulbe, M, Parthasarathy, H and Tripathy, MR (2018) Parameter estimation of an inhomogeneous medium by scattered electromagnetic fields using nonlinear optics and wavelets. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 85, 35–50.Google Scholar
Kim, D, Jeong, YY and Jon, S (2010) A drug-loaded aptamer-gold nanoparticle bioconjugate for combined CT imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. ACS Nano 4, 3689–3696.Google Scholar
Kumar, A and Verma, AI (2011) Nonlinear absorption of intense short pulse laser over a metal surface embedded with nanoparticles. Laser and Particle Beams 29, 333–338.Google Scholar
Link, S and El-Sayed, MA (2000) Shape and size dependence of radiative, non-radiative and photothermal properties of gold nanoparticles. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 19, 409–453.Google Scholar
Menard, JM, Betz, M, Sigal, I and Van Driel, HM (2007) Single-beam differential z-scan technique. Applied Optics 46, 2119–2122.Google Scholar
Quarterman, AH, Tyrk, MA and Wilcox, KG (2015) Z-scan measurements of the nonlinear refractive index of a pumped semiconductor disk gain medium. Applied Physics Letters 106, 01105–1–4.Google Scholar
Razvi, MAN, Bakry, AH, Afzal, SM, Khan, SA and Asiri, AM (2015) Synthesis, characterization and determination of third-order optical nonlinearity by cw z-scan technique of novel thiobarbituric acid derivative dyes. Materials Letters 144, 131–134.Google Scholar
Rumi, M and Perry, JW (2010) Two-photon absorption: an overview of measurements and principles. Advances in Optics and Photonics 2, 451–518.Google Scholar
Samuel, P, Ensley, TR, Hu, HD, Hagan, J, Van Stryland, EW and Gaume, R (2015) Nonlinear refractive index measurement on pure and Nd doped YAG ceramic by dual arm Z-scan technique. Proceeding Solid State Physics, AIP Conference 1665, 060010–1–3.Google Scholar
Shaheen, ME and Fryer, BJ (2012) Femtosecond laser ablation of brass: a study of surface morphology and ablation rate. Laser and Particle Beams 30, 473–479.Google Scholar
Sheik-Bahae, M, Said, AA and Van Stryland, EW (1989) High-sensitivity, single-beam n2 measurements. Optics Letters 14, 955–957.Google Scholar
Sheik-Bahae, M, Said, AA, Wei, T, Hagan, DJ and Van Stryland, EW (1990) Sensitive measurement of optical nonlinearities using a single beam. Journal of Quantum Electronics 26, 760–769.Google Scholar
Stepanov, AL (2011) Nonlinear optical properties of implanted metal nanoparticles in various transparent matrixes: a review. Reviews on Advanced Materials and Science 27, 115–145.Google Scholar
Sutherland, RL (2003) Handbook of nonlinear optics, Nonlinear optics, 2nd Edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Svecova, B, Nekvindova, P, Stanek, S, Vytykacocva, S, Mackova, A, Malinsky, P, Miksova, R, Janecek, M, Pesicka, J and Spirkova, (2017) The effect of various silicate-glass matrixes on gold-nanoparticle formation. Ceramics-Silikaty. 61, 52–58.Google Scholar
Trtica, M, Batani, D, Redaelli, R, Limpouch, J, Kmetik, V, Ciganovic, J, Stasic, J, Gakovic, B and Momcilovic, M (2013) Titanium surface modification using femtosecond laser with 1013–1015 W/cm2 intensity in vacuum. Laser and Particle Beams 31, 29–36.Google Scholar
Xu, T, Switkowski, K, Chen, X, Liu, S, Koynov, K, Yu, H, Zhang, H, Wang, J, Sheng, Y and Krolikowski, W (2018) Nature Photography Letters 12, 0225–0221.Google Scholar