Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:03:19.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of plasma shielding effect on laser-ablated copper samples: a focus on signal-to-background ratio and plasma expansion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2016

M. Pishdast ,
A. Eslami Majd  and
M. Kavosh Tehrani
M. Pishdast
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering and Electronic Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. Eslami Majd*
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering and Electronic Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
M. Kavosh Tehrani
Affiliation:
Optics and Laser Science and Technology Research Center, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: A. Eslami Majd, Centre for Electrical Engineering and Electronic Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: ab.eslamimajd@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of plasma shielding effect induced by ambient gas pressure and laser intensity on the laser-produced Cu plasma parameters, signal-to-background ratio (S/B) and expansion are experimentally and numerically investigated. A Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm at various intensities ranging from 2 to 7.1 GW/cm2 intensity (40–150 mJ) is used to produce Cu plasma in air, argon (Ar), helium (He), and neon (Ne) ambient gas at various pressures ranging from 5 to 1000 mbar. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy reveals that spectral radiation, S/B, electron temperature, number density, and front edge velocity of the plasma have an increasing trend up to a certain value of laser intensity and gas pressure. Afterwards, a saturation trend is achieved, which is attributed to the shielding and self-regulation effect. The numerical modeling of the laser-produced Cu plasma in the presence of air at atmospheric pressure is carried out using the MULTI radiation hydrodynamics code. We have shown that the feature of plasma shielding effect observed in the experiments can be reproduced using a continuum hydrodynamics model. Laser intensity at about 3.5 GW/cm2 is found to produce the highest S/B at 1000 mbar air. He, Ne, air, and Ar show the best S/B, respectively and the best S/B is found for air, Ar, He, and Ne at 10, 5, 10, and 20 mbar, respectively. The expansion of plasma plume is studied using a simple and effective technique based on probe laser absorption and scattering method. The plasma plume expansion through He, Ne, air, and Ar at 1000 mbar pressure has the highest velocity, respectively. The simulated results of strong shock wave model and Rankine–Hugoniot jump condition are fitted to the experimental data, which are then used to estimate the values of the ablation parameters.

Keywords

Laser-produced plasmaPlasma shielding effectSignal-to-background ratioPlasma plume expansion
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 493 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguilera, J.A. & Araǵon, C. (1999). A comparison of the temperatures and electron densities of laser-produced plasmas obtained in air, argon, and helium at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Phys. A 69, S475–S478.Google Scholar
Aguilera, J.A., Aragon, C. & Penalba, F. (1998). Plasma shielding effect in laser ablation of metallic samples and its influence on LIBS analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 127, 309–314.Google Scholar
Akram, M., Bashir, B., Hayat, A., Mahmood, K., Ahmad, R. & Khaleeq-U-Rahaman, M. (2014). Effect of laser irradiance on the surface morphology and laser induced plasma parameters of zinc. Laser Part. Beams 32, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzeer, A.M., Al-Dwayyan, M.S., Al-Salhi, M.S., Kamal, A.M. & Harith, M.A. (1996). Optical probing of laser-induced shock waves in air. Appl. Phys. B 63, 307–310.Google Scholar
Bashir, S., Farid, N., Mahmood, Kh. & Shahid Rafique, M. (2012). Influence of ambient gas and its pressure on the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and the surface morphology of laser-ablated Cd. Appl. Phys. A 107, 203–212.Google Scholar
Baudelet, M., Willis, C.C.C., Shah, L. & Richardson, M. (2010). Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of copper with a 2 μm thulium fiber laser. Opt. Express 18, 7905–7910.Google Scholar
Bekfi, G. (1976). Principles of Laser Plasmas. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bleinner, D. & Bogaerts, A. (2006). Multiplicity and contiguity of ablation mechanisms in laser-assisted analytical microsampling. Spectrochim. Acta B 61, 421–432.Google Scholar
Cabalín, L.M., Romero, D., Baena, J.M. & Laserna, J.J. (1999). Saturation effects in the laser ablation of stainless steel in air at atmospheric pressure. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 365, 404–408.Google Scholar
Chan, K.-K., In, J.-H., Lee, S.-H. & Jeong, S. (2013). Influence of Ar buffer gas on the LIBS signal of thin CIGS films. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 28, 460–467.Google Scholar
Cristoforetti, G., Legnaioli, S., Palleschi, V., Tognoni, E. & Benedetti, A. (2008). Observation of different mass removal regimes during the laser ablation of an aluminium target in air. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 23, 1518–1528.Google Scholar
Dan, L. & Duan-Ming, Z. (2008). Vaporization and plasma shielding during high power nanosecond laser ablation of silicon and nickel. Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 1368–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawood, A., Bashir, S., Akram, M., Hayat, A., Ahmed, S., Iqbal, M.H. & Kazmi, A.H. (2015). Effect of nature and pressure of ambient environments on the surface morphology, plasma parameters, hardness, and corrosion resistance of laser-irradiated Mg-alloy. Laser Part. Beams, p. 1 of 16, Cambridge University Press, 0263-0346/15.Google Scholar
Dreyer, C.B., Mungas, G.S., Thanh, P. & Radziszewski, J.G. (2007). Study of sub-mJ-excited laser-induced plasma combined with Raman spectroscopy under Mars atmosphere-simulated conditions. Spectrochim. Acta B 62, 1448–1459.Google Scholar
Elhassan, A., Abd Elmoniem, H.M., Kassem, A.K. & Hairth, M.A. (2010). Effect of applying static electric field on the physical parameters and dynamics of laser-induced plasma. J. Adv. Res. 1, 129–136.Google Scholar
Farahbod, A.H., Afshari, M. & Agayari, E. (2012). Plasma expansion in laser-target interaction process. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 58, 1–7.Google Scholar
Farid, N., Bashir, S. & Mahmood, Kh. (2012). Effect of ambient gas conditions on laser-induced copper plasma and surface morphology. Phys. Scr. 85, 015702 (7 pp.).Google Scholar
Farid, N., Harilal, S.S., Ding, H. & Hassanein, A. (2014). Emission features and expansion dynamics of nanosecond laser ablation plumes at different ambient pressures. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 033107-1 (9 pp.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S.J.R., Harilal, S.S., Diwakar, P.K., Verhoff, B. & Hassanein, A. (2013). Comparison of optical emission from nanosecond and femtosecond laser produced plasma in atmosphere and vacuum conditions. Spectrochim. Acta B 87, 43–50.Google Scholar
Galila, A.M., Hisham, I. Yosr, E. & Gamal, E-D. (2010). Studying the Role of Ambient Conditions in Laser Induced Al-Plasma Expansion. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56, 300–308.Google Scholar
Gregorcic, P. & Mozina, J. (2011). High-speed two-frame shadowgraphy for velocity measurements of laser-induced plasma and shock-wave evolution. Opt. Lett. 36, 2782.Google Scholar
Hafeez, S., Shaikh, N., Rashid, B. & Baig, M.A. (2008). Plasma properties of laser-ablated strontium target. J. Appl. Phy. D 3, 083117 (8 pp.).Google Scholar
Hahn, W.D. & Nicolo, O. (2010). Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), Part I: Review of basic diagnostics and plasma–particle interactions: Still-challenging issues within the analytical plasma community. Appl. Spectros. 64, 335A–366A.Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Bindhu, C.V., Nampoori, V.P.N. & Vallabhan, C.P.G. (1998 a). Influence of ambient gas on the temperature and density of laser produced carbon plasma. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 167–169.Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Bindhu, C.V., Nampoori, V.P.N. & Vallabhan, C.P.G. (1998 b). Temporal and Spatial behavior of electron density and temperature in a laser-produced plasma from YBa2Cu3O7 . Appl. Spect 52, 449–455.Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Miloshevsky, G.V., Diwakar, P.K., LaHaye, N.L. & Hassanein, A. (2012). Experimental and computational study of complex shockwave dynamics in laser ablation plumes in argon atmosphere. Phys. Plasmas 19, 083504 (11 pp.).Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., O'Shay, B., Tao, Y. & Tillack, M.S. (2006). Ambient gas effects on the dynamics of laser-produced tin plume expansion. J. Appl. Phys 99, 083303 (8 pp.).Google Scholar
Harilal, S.S., Bindhu, C.V., Issac, R.C., Nampoori, V.P.N. & Vallabhan, C.P.G. (1997). Electron density and temperature measurements in a laser produced carbon plasma. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2140–2146.Google Scholar
Iida, Y. (1990). Effects of atmosphere on laser vaporization and excitation processes of solid samples. Spectrochem. Acta B 45, 1353–1367.Google Scholar
Khan, S., Bashir, S., Hayat, A., Khaleeq-ur-Rahman, M. & Haq, F.-u. (2013). Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of tantalum plasma. Phys. Plasmas 20, 73104 (8 pp.).Google Scholar
Konjevic, N. & Wiese, W.L. (1990). Experimental stark widths and shifts for spectral lines of neutral and ionized atoms. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 19, 1307–1385.Google Scholar
Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Y., Reader, J. & NIST ASD Team (2012). Atomic Spectra Database-Version 5, [Online], National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://physics.nist.gov/asd.Google Scholar
Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. (1959). Fluid Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lee, P., Kumar, S. & Lee, S. (1998). Simulations of laser-produced plasma dynamics in an ambient gas. Laser Part. Beams 16, 317–325.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.I., Thiem, T.L., Kim, G.H., Teng, Y.Y. & Sneddon, J. (1992). Interaction of an excimer-laser beam with metals. Part III: The effect of a controlled atmosphere in laser-ablated plasma emission. Appl. Spectrosc. 46, 1597–1604.Google Scholar
Luo, W.F., Zhao, X.X., Sun, Q.B., Gao, C.X., Tang, J., Wang, H.J. & Zhao, W. (2010). Characteristics of the aluminum alloy plasma produced by a 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser with different irradiances. Pramana – J. Phys. 74, 945–959.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S., Rawat, R.S., Springham, S.V., Tan, T.L. & Le, E.P. (2010). Material ablation and plasma plume expansion study from Fe and graphite targets in Ar gas atmosphere. Appl. Phys. A 101, 695–699.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S., Rawat, R.S., Zakaullah, M., Lin, J.J., Tan, T.L., Springham, S.V. & Lee, P. (2009). Investigation of plume expansion dynamics and estimation of ablation parameters of laser ablated Fe plasma. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 135504–135514.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, S., Aghaei, M. & Tavassoli, S.H. (2010). Effect of background gas pressure and laser pulse intensity on laser induced plasma radiation of copper samples. Phys. Plasma 17, 043301 (9 pp.).Google Scholar
Mihaila, I., Ursu, C., Gegiuc, A. & Popa, G. (2010). Diagnostics of plasma plume produced by laser ablation using ICCD imaging and transient electrical probe technique. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 207, 012005.Google Scholar
Nakimana, A., Tao, H., Gao, X., Hao, Z. & Lin, J. (2013). Effects of ambient conditions on femtosecond laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of Al. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46 285204 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, R.R. (1968). A method for the correction of instrumental broadening of a littrow mount grating spectrometer. Infrared Phys. Technol. 8, 197–198.Google Scholar
Ramis, R. (2012). MULTI-1D user's manual – Version 2009. E.T.S.I. Aeron áuticos, Universidad Polit écnica de Madrid.Google Scholar
Ramis, R., Schmaltz, R. & Meyer-ter-Vehn, J. (1988). MULTI – A computer code for one-dimensional multigroup radiation hydrodynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 49, 475–505.Google Scholar
Rezaei, F. & Tavassoli, S.H. (2012). Numerical and experimental investigation of laser induced plasma spectrum of aluminum in the presence of a noble gas. Spectrochim. Acta B 78, 29–36.Google Scholar
Sdorra, W. & Niemax, K. (1992). Basic investigations for laser microanalysis: III. Application of different buffer gases for laser-produced sample plumes. Microchim. Acta 107, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.K. (1996). Transient plasma shielding effects during pulsed laser ablation of materials. J. Electron. Mater. 25, 125–129.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., Thornton, B., Ohki, K. & Sakka, T. (2015). Calibration-free analysis of immersed brass alloys using long-ns-duration pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with and without correction for nonstoichiometric ablation. Spectrochim. Acta B 111, 8–14.Google Scholar
Vadillo, J.M., Fernándej Romero, J.M., Rodríguez, C.E. & Laserna, J.J. (1999). Effect of plasma shielding on laser ablation rate of pure metals at reduced pressure. Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 1009–1015.Google Scholar
Zeng, X., Mao, X., Mao, S.S., Yoo, J.H., Greif, R. & Russo, R.E. (2004). Laser–plasma interactions in fused silica cavities. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 816.Google Scholar
Zhang, D., Liu, D., Li, Z., Hou, S., Yu, B., Guan, L., Tan, X. & Lia, L. (2005). A new model of pulsed laser ablation and plasma shielding. Physica B 362, 82–87.Google Scholar
Zmerli, B., Ben Nessib, N., Dimitrijevic, M.S. & Sahal-Bréchot, S. (2010). Stark broadening calculations of neutral copper spectral lines and temperature dependence. Phys. Scr. 82, 055301. (9 pp).Google Scholar