Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:32:50.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lisk-Broom: A laser concept for clearing space debris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Claude Phipps
Claude Phipps
Affiliation:
Laser Sciences and Applications Group, Mail Stop E543, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

So-called “space junk” forced a change of plan for a recent Shuttle mission. However, ground-based lasers with atmospheric-turbulence-compensating beam directors represent a singularly effective method of de-orbiting space junk, because they use cheap Earth-based power, and because they lend themselves to rapid retargeting. Plasma physics and lasertarget interaction theory dictate the laser parameters for a particular mission. We will discuss a practical laser system and beam director with 20-kW average power at 0.5-µm wavelength that is capable of clearing most low-Earth-orbit objects with mass less than 100 kg in about 4 years. This is a special application of the Laser Impulse Space Propulsion (LISP) concept, by which objects are propelled in space by the ablation jet produced on their surface by a remote laser.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 33 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, J.J. 1989 Appl. Opt. 28, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flury, W. & McKnight, D., D. 1993 Advances in Space Research, Flury, W., ed. (Pergamon, Oxford), p. 299.Google Scholar
Herman, B. et al. 1978 The Infrared Handbook, Wolf, W.L. and Zyssis, G.J., eds., pp. 4–13, 4–47 et seq.Google Scholar
Ho, C. et al. 1993 Space Debris Detection and Mitigation, Proc. SPIE 1951, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, D.S. & Fudge, M.L. 1993 Space Debris Detection and Mitigation, Proc. SPIE 1951, 103.Google Scholar
Phipps, C.R. 1993 In Proc. Near-Earth-Object Interception Workshop, paper Cl, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12476-C, 111Google Scholar
Phipps, C.R. & Dreyfus, R.W. 1993a Laser Microprobe Mass Analysis, Vertes, A., Gijbels, R. and Adams, F., eds. (John Wiley, New York), p. 369.Google Scholar
Phipps, C.R. & Dreyfus, R.W. 1993b Laser Microprobe Mass Analysis,Vertes, A., Gijbels, R. and Adams, F., eds. (John Wiley, New York), p. 381.Google Scholar
Phipps, C.R. & Michaelis, M.M. 1994 Laser Part. Beam 12, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, C.R. et al. 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegman, A.E. 1993 In Proc. Ninth International Symposium on Gas Flow and Chemical Lasers, Proc. SPIE 1810 (discusses the beam quality parameter M2. Our parameter N is the same as Siegman's M2).Google Scholar