Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:38:19.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray emission induced by 1.2–3.6 MeV Kr13+ ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2012

Cexiang Mei ,
Yongtao Zhao ,
Xiaoan Zhang ,
Jieru Ren ,
Xianming Zhou ,
Xing Wang ,
Yu Lie ,
Changhui Liang ,
Yaozong Li  and
Guoqing Xiao
Cexiang Mei
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang, China
Yongtao Zhao*
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
Xiaoan Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang, China
Jieru Ren
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
Xianming Zhou
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
Xing Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
Yu Lie
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
Changhui Liang
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang, China
Yaozong Li
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang, China
Guoqing Xiao
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Yongtao Zhao, Insitute of Modern Physics. Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, China. E-mail: zhaoyt@impcas.ac.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X-ray emission from Kr13+ ions in the energy range 1.2–3.6 MeV in steps of 0.6 MeV impacting on an Au target was investigated on electron cyclotron resonance ion source at the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou. It was found that a shift of the X-ray lines to the higher energy side occurred. We measured the relationship between the characteristic of X-ray yield of Au M X-rays and Kr L X-rays as a function of incident energy. Furthermore, M-shell X-ray production cross-section of Au induced by Kr13+ was measured. The measured cross-section of target is compared to the classical binary-encounter approximation and plane-wave-born approximation theoretical model, which is a significant different between experimental and theoretical model.

Keywords

Energy shift and line broadeningInertial X-rayIon beam matter interaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 665 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, M.C., Mcdaniel, F.D., Duggan, J.L., Miller, P.D., Pepmiller, P.L., Krause, H.F., Rosseel, T.M., Rayburn, L.A., Mehta, R. & Lapicki, G. (1987). L- and M-shell X-ray production cross-sections of Nd, Gd, Ho, Yb, Au, and Pb by 25-MeV carbon and 32-MeV oxygen ions. Phys. Rev. A 36, 3699–3706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awaya, Y., Kambara, T. & Kanai, Y. (1999). Multiple K- and L-shell ionizations of target atoms by collisions with high-energy heavy ions. Inter. J. Mass. Spec. 192, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaś, D., Pajek, M., Semaniak, J., Braziewicz, J., Kubala-Kukuś, A., Majewska, U., Czyśewski, T., Jaskóla, M., Kretschmer, W., Mukoyama, T. & Trautmann, D. (2002). Multiple ionization effects in low-resolution X-ray spectra induced by energy heavy ions. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sec. B 195, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, W. & Lapicki, G. (1981). Energy-loss effect in inner-shell Coulomb ionization by heavy charged particles. Phys. Rev. A 23, 1717–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnota, M., Banaś, D., Braziewicz, J., Semaniak, J.Pajek, M., Jaskola, M., Korman, A., Trautmann, D., Kretschmer, W., Lapicki, G., & Mukoyama, T. (2009). X-ray study of M-shell ionization of heavy atoms by 8.0–35.2-MeV Oq+ ions: The role of the multiple ionization effects. Phys. Rev. A 79, 032710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fano, U. & Lichten, W. (1965). Interpretation of Ar+-Ar Collisions at 50 KeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 627–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J.D. (1970). Inner-shell ionizations by proton impact. Phys. Rev. A 1, 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, W.H.N.K.D., Mallett, J.H. & Hubbell, J.H. (1970). Compilation of X-ray cross-sections. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-50174 (Section I, 1970; Section II, 1969; Section III, 1969; Section IV, 1969).Google Scholar
Gryzinski, M. (1965). Classical theory of atomic collisions. I. Theory of inelastic collisions. Phys. Rev. A 138, 336–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansteen, J.M. & Mosebekk, O.P. (1973). Atomic coulomb excitation by heavy charged particles. Nucl. Phys. A 201, 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.H.H., Blazevic, A., Korostiy, S., Ni, P., Pikuz, S.A., Rosmej, O., Roth, M., Tahir, N.A., Udrea, S., Varentsov, D., Weyrich, K., Sharkov, B.Y. & Maron, Y. (2007). Inertial fusion energy issues of intense heavy ion and laser beams interacting with ionized matter studied at GSI-Darmstadt. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sec. A 577, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.E., Basbas, G. & Mcdaniel, F.D. (1979). X-ray Emission induced by 1.2-3.6 MeV Kr13+ ions. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapicki, G., Laubert, R. & Brandt, W. (1980). Coulomb-deflection effect in inner-shell ionization by heavy charged particles. Phys. Rev. A 22, 1889–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.M. & Zhao, Z.X. (1981). Systematic variation of line-shift of K α radiation from atomic ions. Acta Phys. Sinica 30, 105–110.Google Scholar
Liu, Z.Q. & Cipolla, S.J. (1996). ISICS: A program for calculating K-, L- and M-shell cross-section from ECPSSR theory using a personal computer. Comp. Phys. Communi. 97, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, E.J. (1972). Atomic M-shell Coster-Kronig, auger, and radiative rates, and fluorescence yields for Ca-Th. Phys. Rev. A 5, 1043–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, R., Duggan, J.L., Mcdaniel, F.D., Andrews, M.C., Lapicki, G., Miller, P.D., Rayburn, L.A. & Zander, A.R. (1983). Direct ionization and electron capture in M-shell x-ray production by fluorine ions. Phys. Rev. A 28, 2722–2726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, R., Duggan, J.L., Mcdaniel, F.D., Mcneir, M.R., Yu, Y.C., Marble, D.K. & Lapicki, G. (1993). L-shell X-ray production cross-sections for 29Cu, 31Ga, 32Ge, 35Br, 39Y, 60Nd, 64Gd, 67Ho, 70Yb, 79Au, and 82Pb for 2-25 MeV carbon ions. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 79 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukoyama, T. (1986). Relativistic calculations of the excitation cross-sections of hydrogen-like ions by heavy charged-particle impact. Bull. Inst. Chem. Res. 64, 12–19.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J.R. (1928). On the quantum theory of the capture of electrons. Phys. Rev. 31, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouziane, S., Amokrane, A. & Toumert, I. (2008). Light ion induced L X-ray production cross-sections in Au and Pb. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 266, 1209–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Fernández, L., Miranda, J., Ruvalcaba-Sil, J.L.Segundo, E. & Oliver, A. (2002). Measurement of M-shell X-ray production induced by protons of 0.3–0.7 MeV on W, Au, Pb, Bi, Th and U. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 189, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkel, T., Hamza, A.V., Barnes, A.V., Schneider, D.H., Banks, J.C. & Doyle, B.L. (1998). Ablation of GaAs by intense, ultrafast electronic excitation from highly charged ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2590–2593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Y.P., Misra, D., Kadhane, U. & Tribedi, L.C. (2006). Line-resolved M-shell X-ray production cross-sections of Pb and Bi induced by highly charged C and F ions. Phys. Rev. A 73, 032712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, C.G., Lear, R.D., Lear, J.T., Sanders, J.T. & Van Rinsvelt, H.A. (1976). K-shell X-ray production cross-section for 1.0–4.4-MeV particles on selected thin targets of Z = 22–34. Phys. Rev. A 13, 953–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Z.Y., Yang, Z.H., Xiao, G.Q., Xu, G.Q., Chen, J. & Yang, Z.R. (2011). Charge state effect on K-shell ionization of aluminum by 600–3400 keV xenonq+ (12 < q < 29) ion collisions. Eur. Phys. J. D 64, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szegedi, S. & Fayez-Hassan, M. (2001). K X-ray production cross-sections for 40–180 keV protons. 3rd Conference on Nuclear & Particle Physics (NUPPAC'01) 20–24 October, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Thompson, A.C., Attwood, D.T., Gullikson, E.M., Howells, M.R., Kortright, J.B., Robinson, A.L. & Underwood, J.H. (2001). X-ray Data Book. Berkley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Winter, H.P., Eder, H. & Aumayr, F. (1999). Kinetic electron emission in the near-threshold region studied for different projectile charges. Internat. J. Mass. Spectr. 192, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z.F., Zeng, L.X., Zhao, Y.T., Wang, J.G., Zhang, X.A., Xiao, G.Q. & Li, F.L. (2012). Charge effect in secondary electron emission from silicon surface induced by slow neon ions. Laser Part. Beams 30, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Chen, X., Yang, Z., Xu, J., Cui, Y., Shao, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y. & Xiao, G. (2010). Molybdenum L-shell X-ray production by 350–600 keV Xeq+ (q = 25–30) ions. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 268, 1564–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X.A., Zhao, Y.T., Hoffmann, D.H.H., Yang, Z.H., Chen, X.M., Xu, Z.F., Li, F.L. & Xiao, G.Q. (2011). X-ray emission of Xe30+ ion beam impacting on Au target. Laser Part. Beams 29, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.T., Xiao, G.Q., Xu, H.S., Zhao, H.W., Xia, J.W., Jin, G.M., Ma, X.W., Liu, Y., Yang, Z.H., Zhang, P.M., Wang, Y.Y., Li, D.H., Zhao, H.Y., Zhan, W.L., Xu, Z.F., Zhao, D., Li, F.L. & Chen, X.M. (2009). An outlook of heavy ion driven plasma research at IMP-Lanzhou. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sec. B 267, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar