Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:28:45.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dresden Codex Eclipse Sequence: Projections for the Years 1970–1992

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Frederick Martin
Frederick Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of English, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from the U. S. Naval Observatory annual astronomical almanacs (1970–1992) in “correlation” with the Maya Calendar Round (CR) sequence indicate that the Dresden Codex lunar table (51a-58b) very probably counted simultaneous sequences of both lunar and solar eclipses on the same set of day names. The contemporary sequence of day names in the CR and the astronomy consistent with it parallels Classic-period Maya observational experience between 9.16.0.0.0 and 9.17.0.0.0.

Los datos presentados demuestran algunos hechos contundentes acerca de la naturaleza de las predicciones mayas de los eclipses, así como también de la estructura del índice lunar del Códice de Dresden. El índice maya fue diseñado para contar eclipses en pares y marcar las posiciones de eventuales eclipses lunares y solares en el mismo grupo de nombres de días. Cuando los eclipses lunares ocurren en la primera línea de las tríadas de los nombres de los días, los eclipses solares caen en la segunda línea. Cada secuencia posee un propio día-base, 11 Manik O Muan para los eclipses lunares y 11 Manik 15 Zac para los eventos solares. Los días-base están separados por 13 tun y/o 18 almanaques (4.680 días). Un glifo 13-tun, que puede referirse a la separación día-base, se registra en la línea final de glifos sobre la décima fotografía (58b, columna D, línea 1). Los días-base del índice, con 13 Muluc suprimidos, están probablemente registrados en la posición del eclipse final (58b, columna D) del índice.

De manera general, parece obvio que los astrónomos mayas construyeron el índice de Dresden a través de un largo proceso de observación, registrando los nombres de días, uno cada vez en la manera en que éstos marcaban la ocurrencia del eclipse. El tiempo inmerso en este proceso fue corto en virtud del hecho de que varios múltiplos de 260, como Justeson (1989:84) sugiere, son valores de eclipses naturales.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 74 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aveni, A. F. 1980 Skywatchers of Ancient Mexico. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F. 1989 Preface. In World Archaeoastronomy, edited by A. F. Aveni, pp. i–xiii. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bricker, H. M., and Bricker, V. R.. 1983 Classic Maya Prediction of Solar Eclipses. Current Anthropology.Google Scholar
Förstemann, E. W. 1906 Commentary on the Maya Manuscript in the Royal Public Library of Dresden. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethology Vol. 4, No. 2. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Guthe, C. E. 1921 A Possible Solution ofthe Number Series on Pages 51 to 58 of the Dresden Codex. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 6, No. 2. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Justeson, J. S. 1989 Ancient Maya Ethnoastronomy: An Overview of Hieroglyphic Sources. In World Archaeoastronomy, edited by A. F. Aveni, pp. 76–129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. 1962 Glyphic Evidence for a Dynastic Sequence at Quirigua, Guatemala. American Antiquity 27:323–335.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. 1976 Deciphering the Maya Script. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. 1977 Maya Astronomical Tables and Inscriptions. In Native American Astronomy, edited by A. F. Aveni, pp. 57–74. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. 1983 The Maya Calendar Correlation Problem. In Civilization in the Ancient Americas: Essays in Honor of Gordon R. Willey, edited by R. Leventhal and A. Kolata, pp. 157–208. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. 1985 The Lords of Palenque and the Lords of Heaven. In Fifth Palenque Round Table, 1983, vol. VII, edited by V. M. Fields, pp. 235–239. Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. G. 1978 Maya Numeration, Computation, and Calendrical Astronomy. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 15, supplement 1, edited by C. C. Gillispie, pp. 759–818. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Makemson, M. W. 1943 The Astronomical Tables of the Maya. Contributions to American Anthropology and History 546:183–221. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1976 Emblem and State in the Classic Maya Lowlands. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Meinschausen, M. 1913 Über Sonnen- und Mondfinsternisse in der Dresdener Mayahandschrift. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 45: 221–227.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. A. 1969 Eclipses of the Sun. Greenwood Press, New York.Google Scholar
Oppolzer, T. 1887 Canon der Finsternisse. Aus Der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hof- und Staatsdruckerei, in Commission bei Karl Gerold’s Sohn, Wien.Google Scholar
Owen, N. K. 1975 The Use of Eclipse Data to Determine the Correlation Number. In Archaeoastronomy in Pre-Columbian America, edited by A. F. Aveni, pp. 237–246. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1960 Historical Implications of a Pattern of Dates at Piedras Negras, Guatemala. American Antiquity 25: 454–475.Google Scholar
Scheie, L., and Freidel, D.. 1990 A Forest of Kings: The Untold Story of the Ancient Maya. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Smiley, C. H. 1975 The Solar Eclipse Warning Table in the Dresden Codex. In Archaeoastronomy in Pre-Columbian America, edited by A. F. Aveni, pp. 247–256. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Spinden, H. J. 1930 Maya Dates and What They Reveal. Museum of the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences, New York.Google Scholar
Teeple, J. E. 1931 Maya Astronomy. Contributions to American Archaeology 402:29–115. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1960 Maya Hieroglyphic Writing. 2nd ed. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1972 A Commentary on the Dresden Codex: A Maya Hieroglyphic Book. Memoirs No. 93. American Philophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office 1970–1980 The American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac. USGPO, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office 1981–1992 The Astronomical Almanac. USGPO, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Willson, R. W. 1924 Astronomical Notes on the Maya Codices. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 6, No. 3. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar