Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:16:49.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political, Social, and Cultural Capital in the Chilean Political Elite, 1990–2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2020

Luis Garrido-Vergara Open the ORCID record for Luis Garrido-Vergara [Opens in a new window]
Luis Garrido-Vergara*
Affiliation:
Luis Garrido-Vergara is a professor in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at the Universidad de Santiago, Chile (USACH).
*
luis.garrido.v@usach.cl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although sociological research has examined the reproduction of Chile’s elites, there is little empirical evidence of how different forms of capital operate among them. Using datasets for members of the Chilean political elite from 1990 to 2010, this country note examines and measures the effect of political, social, and cultural capital on the access of certain individuals to strategic positions in the political field, comparing the legislative and executive branches as represented by deputies and ministers. The empirical analysis includes logit models.

Keywords

species of capitalpolitical elitesparliamentministersChile
Type
Country Note
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 121 - 141
Copyright
© University of Miami 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Paul. 1999. Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Sociological Methods and Research 28, 2: 186—208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, Junaid. 2017. Public Sector Appointments, Political Influence and Performance: Perceptions of the Situation in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 39, 3: 211—16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomore, Tom. 2006. Elites and Society. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The Genesis of the Concepts of Habitus and Field. Sociocriticism 2, 2: 11—24.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Capital, ed. Richardson, John. New York: Greenwood Press. 241—58.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1997. Crossing Swords: Politics and Religion in Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2013. Political Recruitment Across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884—1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cordero, Rodrigo. 2006. La composición social de la nueva cámara de diputados: cambios y continuidades en perspectiva histórica (1961—2010). Documento de Trabajo, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales 2, 8. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Fleet, Michael, and Smith, Brian. 1997. The Catholic Church and Democracy in Chile and Peru. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Zephyr Lake. 2001. Elite Families and Oligarchic Politics on the Brazilian Frontier: Mato Grosso, 1889—1937. Latin American Research Review 36, 1: 49—74.Google Scholar
Garrido-Vergara, Luis. 2013. Elites, Political Elites and Social Change in Modern Societies. Revista de Sociología 28: 31—49.Google Scholar
Genieys, William. 2005. The Sociology of Political Elites in France: The End of an Exception? International Political Science Review 26, 4: 413—30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12, 3: 564—81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bustamante, Bastián. 2013. Factores de acceso y permanencia de la élite política gubernamental en Chile (1990–2010). Política 51, 1: 119–53.Google Scholar
González-Bustamante, Bastián, and Olivares, Alejandro. 2016. Cambios de gabinete y super-vivencia de los ministros en Chile durante los gobiernos de la Concertación (1990–2010). Colombia Internacional 87: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bustamante, Bastián, and Garrido-Vergara, Luis. 2018. Socialización, trayectorias y poscarrera de ministros en Chile, 1990–2010. Política y Gobierno 25, 1: 31–64.Google Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo. 2011. Tecnócratas, technopols y dirigentes de partido: tipos de agentes y especies de capital en las elites gubernamentales de la Concertación (1990–2010). In Notables, tecnócratas y mandarines: ehmentos de sociología de las elites en Chile (1990–2010), ed. Joignant, and Güell, Pedro. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo. 2014. El capital político familiar: ventajas de parentela y concentraciones de mer-cado en las elecciones generales chilenas de 2013. Política. Revista de Ciencia Política 52, 2: 13–48.Google Scholar
Kuha, Jouni, and Mills, Colin. 2018. On Group Comparisons with Logistic Regression Models. Sociological Methods and Research 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2003. You Select the Rules of the Game and Lose? Advantages and Constraints when Choosing Electoral Rules: The Case of Chile. Ph.D. diss., New York University.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querubin, Pablo. 2016. Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11, 2: 151–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristóbal, Rovira Kaltwasser. 2009. Toward a Historical Analysis of Elites in Latin America. In 21st IPSA World Congress of Political Science, Santiago, Chile, July 12–16. Pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
Cristóbal, Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. Political Elites in Latin America. In The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, ed. Best, Heinrich and Higley, John. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 255–71.Google Scholar
Samuels, David, and Shugart, Matthew. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2009. Elite-Mass Congruence, Partidocracia and the Quality of Chilean Democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1, 3: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2012. Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. 2009. In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Špaček, Ondřej. 2017. Measuring Cultural Capital: Taste and Legitimate Culture of Czech Youth. Sociological Research Online 22, 1: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thumala, María. 2010. The Richness of Ordinary Life: Religious Justification Among Chile’s Business Elite. Religion 40, 1: 14–26.Google Scholar
Tittenbrun, Jacek. 2016. Concepts of Capital in Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory. Miscellanea Anthropologica et Sociologica 17, 1: 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel, Scully, Timothy, and Somma, Nicolas. 2007. The Enduring Presence of Religion in Chilean Ideological Positionings and Voter Options. Comparative Politics 40, 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gunten, Tod. 2015. Brokers, Clients, and Elite Political Networks in Mexico. Working Paper. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.Google Scholar
Williams, Richard. 2009. Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Sociological Methods and Research 37, 4: 531–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Garrido-Vergara supplementary material

Garrido-Vergara supplementary material

Download Garrido-Vergara supplementary material(File)
File 63 KB