Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:04:43.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Afro-Brazilian Collective Land: Analyzing Institutional Changes in the Past Two Hundred Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Célia Futemma ,
Lúcia Chamlian Munari  and
Cristina Adams
Célia Futemma
Affiliation:
State University of Campinas
Lúcia Chamlian Munari
Affiliation:
University of Hohenheim, Germany
Cristina Adams
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Afro-Brazilian communities (quilombos) hold rights to a collective territory where they live and that supports their livelihoods. Historically, Afro-Brazilian smallholders have been subjected to contradictory programs and policies that either restrain traditional practices such as shifting cultivation or aim at empowering these communities. This is the first attempt to adopt the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) theoretical framework to study the historical transformation of the institutional structure in Afro-Brazilian territories of the Ribeira Valley, São Paulo, Brazil. Our results reveal a history of long-term, continuous relationships between locals and external groups, sometimes combative and at other times cooperative, reflecting tensions and contradictions. As a result, quilombo communities have gradually emerged as leaders in an institutional arrangement that is moving toward co-governance or partnerships. We believe that if these communities achieve full economic and political autonomy, they might be able to self-govern their territories and reconcile the dual goals of local development and environmental conservation.

Resumo

Resumo

As comunidades Afro-Brasileiras (Quilombo) detêm direitos ao território coletivo, o qual representa o local de moradia e a base de seus sustentos. Historicamente, as populações rurais de Afro-Brasileiros têm sido submetidas a programas contraditórios e políticas que, ora restringem as práticas de cultivo itinerante, ora visam o fortalecimento político das comunidades. Esta é primeira tentativa de aplicar o arcabouço teórico análise institucional e de desenvolvimento (IAD) para estudar a transformação histórica da estrutura institucional dos territórios quilombolas do Vale do Ribeira, São Paulo, Brasil. Nossos resultados revelam uma história longa de relações contínuas entre os locais e grupos externos, relações essas, algumas vezes conflitiva, outras vezes, cooperativa, as quais refletem tensões e contradições. Como resultado, observa-se, gradualmente, a emergência de lideranças nas comunidades quilombolas dentro dessa estrutura institucional que se move em direção a uma co-governança ou de compartilhamento. Acreditamos que se essas comunidades alcançarem completa autonomia política e econômica, elas serão capazes de autogovernar seus territórios e conciliar o objetivo duplo, desenvolvimento local e conservação ambiental.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , 2015 , pp. 26 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

The first author gratefully acknowledges the support of the FAPESP for research funds (no. 07/53308-1). We thank the State University of Campinas and the University of São Paulo for their academic support. We owe gratitude to all people from the quilombola communities in the Ribeira Valley (state of São Paulo) and all other key informants for making the collection of data possible. The authors assume full responsibility for the content presented in this study.

References

Adams, Cristina, Munari, Lúcia, Vliet, Nathalie Van, Murrieta, Rui, Piperata, Barbara, Futemma, Célia, Pedroso, Nelson Jr., Taqueda, Carolina, Crevelaro, M. A., and Prado, Vânia 2013 “Diversifying Incomes and Losing Landscape Complexity in Quilombola Shifting Cultivation Communities of the Atlantic Rainforest (Brazil).” Human Ecology 41 (1): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Lee J., Libecap, Gary D., and Mueller, Bernardo 1999 Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Krister, Gustavo Gordillo de, Anda, and Frank van, Laerhoven 2009 Local Governments and Rural Development: Comparing Lessons from Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Arruti, José M. A. 1997 “A emergência dos ”remanescentes“: Notas para o diálogo entre indígenas e quilombos.” Mana 3 (2): 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruti, José M. A. 2008 “Quilombos.” In Raça: Perspectivas antropológicas, edited by Pinho, Osmundo, 1–33. Campinas, SP: Unicamp/EDUFBA.Google Scholar
Barretto Filho, Henyo 2009 “Traditional Populations: Introduction to the Critique of the Political Ecology of a Notion.” In Amazon Peasant Societies in a Changing Environment: Political Ecology, Invisibility and Modernity in the Rainforest, edited by Adams, Cristina, Murrieta, Rui S. S., Neves, Walter A., and Harris, Mark, 95–129. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, Barros Edir Pina 2007 “Quilombos e quilombolas: A contribuição da Associação Brasileira de Antropologia.” Etnográfica 2:344.Google Scholar
Boff, Leonardo 1988 When Theology Listens to the Poor. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Braga, Roberto 1999 “Raízes da questão regional no Estado de São Paulo: Considerações sobre o Vale do Ribeira.” Geografia 24:43–68.Google Scholar
Carril, Lourdes F. B. 1995 “Terras de negros no Vale do Ribeira: Territorialidade e resistência.” Master's thesis, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Castro, Fábio 2000 “Fishing Accords: The Political Ecology of Fishing Intensification in the Amazon.” PhD diss., Indiana University.Google Scholar
Chuenpagdee, Ratana 2011 “Interactive Governance for Marine Conservation: An Illustration.” Bulletin of Marine Science 87 (2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Vera S., Favareto, Arilson, Galvanese, Carolina, and Menino, Frederico 2005 “As regras do jogo e o jogo das regras: Movimentos sociais, governança ambiental e desenvolvimento territorial no Vale do Ribeira (Brasil).” Paper presented at the Fóruns Participativo do Vale do Ribeira.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1988 “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Donna, and Jeffery, Michael 2006 “Global Environmental Governance and the United Nations in the 21st Century.” Paper presented at the European Union Forum Strengthening International Environmental Governance, Sydney Opera House, November 24.Google Scholar
Edgar, Laura, Marshall, Claire, and Basset, Michael 2006 Partnerships: Putting Good Governance Principles in Practice. Ottawa: Institute on Governance.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo 1998 “Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements.” Journal of Political Ecology 5:53–82.Google Scholar
Failed, Tulia G. 2005 “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 327–346.Google Scholar
Feeny, David, Berkes, Fikret, McCay, Bonnie J., and Acheson, James M. 1992 “The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-Two Years Later.” Human Ecology 18 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fréchette, Alain, and Lewis, Nathalie 2011 “Pushing the Boundaries of Conventional Forest Policy Research: Analyzing Institutional Change at Multiple Levels.” Forest Policy and Economics 13 (7): 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futemma, Célia 2000 “Collective Action and Assurance of Property Rights to Natural Resources: A Case Study from the Lower Amazon Region, Santarém, Brazil.” PhD diss., Indiana University.Google Scholar
Gama, Gama Alcides Moreira 2005 “O direito de propriedade das terras ocupadas pelas comunidades descendentes de quilombos.” Jus Navigandi 10 no. 825. http://jus.com.br/artigos/7396.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Gustavo 1996 Essential Writings. Edited by Nickoloff, James B. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, Daniel, Carmo, Roberto L., Alves, Humberto, Rodrigues, Izilda, and Garcia, Estela M. 1998 “Sustentabilidade no Vale do Ribeira (SP): Conservação ambiental e melhoria das condições de vida da população.” Ambiente e Sociedade 3:151–175.Google Scholar
ITESP (Instituto de Terras do Estado de São Paulo “José Gomes da Silva”) 1998 Relatório técnico-científico sobre os remanescentes da comunidade de quilombo de São Pedro, no Vale do Ribeira/São Paulo. São Paulo, SP: Secretaria da Justiça e da Defesa da Cidadania.Google Scholar
ITESP (Instituto de Terras do Estado de São Paulo “José Gomes da Silva”) 2003 Relatório técnico-científico sobre os remanescentes da comunidade de quilombo de Pedro Cubas de Cima, no Vale do Ribeira/São Paulo. São Paulo, SP: Secretaria da Justiça e da Defesa da Cidadania.Google Scholar
Jentoft, Svein 2003 “Co-Management: The Way Forward?” In The Fisheries Co-Management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects, edited by Wilson, Douglas Clyde, Nielsen, Jesper Raakjaer, and Degnbol, Poul, 1–14. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Laurance, William F. 2009 “Conserving the Hottest of the Hotspots.” Biological Conservation 142:1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 2001 Management of Non-Governmental Development Organizations: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Litvack, Jennie, Ahmad, Junaid, and Bird, Richard M. 1998 Rethinking Decentralization in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinho, Marinho Marcos dos 2007 “Direito ambiental e populações tradicionais.” Jus Navigandi 12, no. 1643. http://jus.com.br/artigos/10814.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 2011 “An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework for the Analysis of Institutions and their Development.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, Ole, Padoch, Christine, Jefferson, Fox, Cramb, Rob A., Leisz, Stephen J., Lam, Nguyen T., and Vien, Tran D. 2009 “Swidden Change in Southeast Asia: Understanding Causes and Consequences.” Human Ecology 37:259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munari, Lúcia 2010 “Memória social e ecologia histórica: A agricultura de coivara das populações quilombolas do Vale do Ribeira e sua relação com a formação da mata atlântica local.” Master's diss., Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Netting, Robert 1993 Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1991 “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Eliane C. 2009 “Quilombos: Os caminhos do reconhecimento em uma perspectiva contrastiva entre o direito e a antropologia.” Fronteiras 11 (19): 165–178.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor 1990 Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor 1992 Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor 2005 Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Basurto, Xavier 2011 “Crafting Analytical Tools to Study Institutional Change.” Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (3): 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Gardner, Roy, and Walker, James 1994 Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Schlager, Edella 1996 “The Formation of Property Rights.” In Rights to Nature: Ecological, Economic, Cultural, and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, 179–203. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Pedroso Junior, Nelson, Murrieta, Rui, Taqueda, Carolina, Navazinas, Natasha D., Ruivo, Aglair P., Bernardo, Danilo V., and Neves, Walter 2008 “A casa e a roça: Socioeconomia, demografia e a agricultura em populações quilombolas do vale do Ribeira, São Paulo, Brasil.” Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi: Ciências Humanas 3 (2): 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, George E. 1997 Decentralization in Latin America: Learning through Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petkova, Elena, Larson, Anne, Contreras-Hermosillas, Arnoldo, and Toni, Fabiano 2010 “Governance, Forests and REDD+ in Latin America.” CIFOR Infobrief no. 28:1–8.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro 1998 “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, Queiroz Renato da 2006 Caipira negros no Vale do Ribeira: Um estudo de antropologia econômica. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Milton, Metzger, Jean Paul, Martensen, Alexandre, Ponzoni, Flávio, and Hirota, Márcia 2009 “The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How Much Is Left, and How Is the Remaining Forest Distributed? Implications for Conservation.” Biological Conservation 142: 1141–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Kátia P., and Tatto, Nilto 2008 Agenda socioambiental de comunidades quilombolas do Vale do Ribeira. São Paulo, SP: Instituto Socioambiental.Google Scholar
Schelhas, John, and Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo 2006 “Post-Frontier Forest Change Adjacent to Braulio Carrillo National Park, Costa Rica.” Human Ecology 34 (3): 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Alessandra, Turatti, Maria, and Carvalho, Maria 2002 “Atualização do conceito de quilombo: Identidade e território nas definições teóricas.” Ambiente e Sociedade 10:1–10.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas 1988 Where the Dove Calls: The Political Ecology of a Peasant Corporate Community in Northwestern Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Shopes, Linda 2004 “What Is Oral History?” History Matters: The U.S. Survey Course on the Web. http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/oral/. February 2002.Google Scholar
Shriar, Avrum 2007 “In Search of Sustainable Land Use and Food Security in the Arid Hillside Regions of Central America: Putting the Horse before the Cart.” Human Ecology (35): 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonich, Susan 1993 “I Am Destroying the Land!”: The Political Ecology of Poverty and Environmental Destruction in Honduras. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Tang, Zhenghong, and Zhao, Nan 2011 “Assessing the Principles of Community-Based Natural Resources Management in Local Environmental Conservation Plans.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 13 (3): 405–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twyman, Chasca 2000 “Participatory Conservation? Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Botswana.” Geographical Journal 166 (4): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentin, Agnaldo 2006 “Uma civilização do arroz: Agricultura, comércio e subsistência no Vale do Ribeira (1800–1880).” PhD diss., University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Van Vliet, Nathalie, Adams, Cristina, Vieira, Ima, and Mertz, Ole 2013 “‘Slash and Burn’ and ‘Shifting’ Cultivation Systems in Forest Agriculture Frontiers from the Brazilian Amazon.” Society and Natural Resources 26 (12): 1454–1467. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2013.820813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vliet, Nathalie, Mertz, Ole, Heinimann, Andreas, Langanke, Tobias, Pascual, Unai, Schmook, Birgit, Adams, Cristina, Schmidt-Vogt, Dietrich, Messerli, Peter, Leisz, Stephen, Castella, Jean-Christophe, J⊘rgensen, Lars, Birch-Thomsen, Torben, Hett, Cornelia, Bech-Bruun, Thilde, Ickowitz, Amy, Vu, Kim Chi, Yasuyuki, Kono, Jefferson, Fox, Padoch, Christine, Dressier, Wolfram, and Ziegler, Alan D. 2012 “Trends, Drivers and Impacts of Changes in Swidden Cultivation in Tropical Forest-Agriculture Frontiers: A Global Assessment.” Global Environmental Change 22:418–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Paige, Igoe, James, and Brockington, Dan 2006 “Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas.” Annual Review of Anthropology 35:251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar