Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:00:57.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Assessment of Empirical Research on Dependencia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Steven Jackson ,
Bruce Russett ,
Duncan Snidal  and
David Sylvan
Steven Jackson
Affiliation:
Yale University
Bruce Russett
Affiliation:
Yale University
Duncan Snidal
Affiliation:
Yale University
David Sylvan
Affiliation:
Yale University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dependencia theory is in vogue among social scientists throughout the world. Having originated in Latin America in the early 1960s, it was widely embraced both there and in parts of Europe and Africa by the end of the decade. In the 1970s, North Americans joined the flood of scholars attempting to grapple with the problems of underdevelopment in the so-called Third World from a perspective explicitly rejecting traditional theories of development. With this new stream of researchers came new tools and new approaches to the study of peripheral societies, tools and approaches intended to complement those previously used within the dependencia tradition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , 1979 , pp. 7 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

For support of this research we are grateful to the National Science Foundation and the German Marshall Fund. Thomas Biersteker offered useful comments on the manuscript. Of course, only we are responsible for the product. An earlier version of the article was presented to the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1978.

References

AMIN, S. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. 2 vols. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google Scholar
BALESTRA, P. and NERLOVE, M. “Pooling Cross-Section and Time-Series Data in the Estimation of a Dynamic Model: The Demand for Natural Gas,” Econometrica 34, no. 3 (1966):585–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIERSTEKER, T. Distortion or Development? Contending Perspectives on the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
BORNSCHIER, V., CHASE-DUNN, C., and RUBINSON, R. “Cross-National Evidence of the Effects of Foreign Investment and Aid on Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of Findings and a Reanalysis,” American Journal of Sociology 84, no. 3 (1978):651–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAMPBELL, D., and STANLEY, J. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.Google Scholar
CARDOSO, F. “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States,” LARR 12, no. 3 (1977):7–24.Google Scholar
CARDOSO, F., and FALETTO, E. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1969. English edition, Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
CHASE-DUNN, C. “The Effects of International Economic Dependence on Development and Inequality: A Cross-National Study,” American Sociological Review 40, no. 6 (1975):720–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHILCOTE, R. “A Question of Dependency,” LARR 13, no. 1 (1978):55–68.Google Scholar
DOMÍNGUEZ, J. “Consensus and Divergence: The State of the Literature on Inter-American Relations in the 1970s,” LARR 13, no. 2 (1978):87–126.Google Scholar
DUVALL, R. “Dependence and Dependencia Theory: Notes toward Precision of Concept and Argument,” International Organization 32, no. 1 (1978):51–78.Google Scholar
DUVALL, R., AND RUSSETT, B. “Some Proposals to Guide Empirical Research on Contemporary Imperialism,” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 2, no. 1 (1976):1–27.Google Scholar
DUVALL, R., JACKSON, S., RUSSETT, B., SNIDAL, D., AND SYLVAN, D. “A Formal Model of ‘Dependencia’ Theory: Structure and Measurement,” in From National Development to Global Community, edited by R. Merritt and B. Russet. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA. Development Problems in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1970.Google Scholar
EMMANUEL, A. Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972.Google Scholar
FAGEN, R. “Studying Latin American Politics: Some Implications of a Dependencia Approach,” LARR 12, no. 2 (1977):3–26.Google Scholar
FRANK, A. G. Lumpenbourgeoisie and Lumpendevelopment: Dependence, Class and Politics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972.Google Scholar
FREEMAN, J., AND DUVALL, R. “The Dynamics of State-Capitalism in Dependent Societies: A Preliminary Analysis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
FURTADO, C. Economic Development of Latin America. 1st ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
GODFREY, M., AND LANGDON, S. “Partners in Underdevelopment? The Transnationalisation Thesis in a Kenyan Context,” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 14, no. 1 (1976):42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLLIST, L., AND JOHNSON, T. “Modelling United States/Latin American Cooperation and Conflict: Dependencia Arguments.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
JACKSON, S., RUSSETT, B., SNIDAL, D., AND SYLVAN, D. “Conflict and Coercion in Dependent States,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22, no. 4 (1978):627–57.Google Scholar
KAUFMAN, R., GELLER, D., AND CHERNOTSKY, H. “A Preliminary Test of the Theory of Dependency,” Comparative Politics 7, no. 3 (1975):303–30.Google Scholar
KUH, E. “The Validity of Cross-Sectionally Estimated Behavior Equations in Time-Series Applications,” Econometrica 27, no. 2 (1959):197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEYS, C. Underdevelopment in Kenya: The Political Economy of Neocolonialism, 1964–1971. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
MADDALA, G. “The Use of Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross-Section and Time-Series Data,” Econometrica 39, no. 2 (1971):341–58.Google Scholar
PREBISCH, R. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations, 1950.Google Scholar
PREBISCH, R. Towards a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America. New York: United Nations, 1963.Google Scholar
PRZEWORSKI, A., AND TEUNE, H. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1970.Google Scholar
QUIJANO, A. Nationalism and Capitalism in Peru: A Study in Neo-Imperialism. New York: Monthlv Review Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEPAN, A., ed. Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies and Future. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
SUNKEL, O., AND FUENZALIDA, E. “The Transnationalization of Capitalism and National Development.” Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 1977. Mimeo.Google Scholar