Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:48:57.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Council Of Elders? The Senate and Its Members in the Southern Cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Mariana Llanos  and
Francisco Sánchez
Mariana Llanos
Affiliation:
Institut für Iberoamerika-Kunde
Francisco Sánchez
Affiliation:
University of Salamanca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This research note contributes to the comparative studies on legislative careers. It sheds light on the scarcely researched members of four Latin American upper houses, the Senates of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay. It examines both the basic social features of the parliamentary elite—age, gender, level of education, and university careers—and the legislators' political careers. The goal is to find out whether the upper houses are composed of a larger proportion of senior members than the respective lower chambers, that is, of members who not only are older, wealthier, and more educated, but that also have greater political experience. As a result of this research, the Senates of Chile and Uruguay stood out for having the largest share of senior members. The Brazilian Senate followed them with a considerable level of seniority. As a consequence of a series of institutional reforms based on the 1994 constitution, the Argentine Senate differed from the other three cases as being a much junior chamber.

Resumen:

Resumen:

Esta nota de investigacion intenta contribuir a los estudios comparativossobrecarreras legislativas, a traves del estudiode los miembros, hasta ahora poco investigados, de cuatro carnaras altas de America Latina: los Senadosde Argentina, Brasil, Chiley Uruguay. La presentenotaexamina tanto los rasgos sociales basicos de la elite parlamentaria -edad, genero, nivel de educacion y carreras universitarias-como las carreras politicas de los legisladores. Elobjetivoquepersiguees comprobarsi las mencionadascamaras altas estan compuestas por un mayor mimero de miembros seniorque las respectivas camaras bajas, es decir, por miembros que no solamente son mas viejos, masadinerados y mas educados, sino quecuentancon una experiencia politica mayor. Como resultado, los Senados de Chile y Uruguay se destacan por tener la proporcion mas alta de miembros senior, a los que les sigue el Senado brasileno con un nivel bastante considerable. En cambio, como consecuencia de una serie de reformas institucionales basadas en la Constitución de 1994, el Senado argentino difiere de los tres anteriores por tener una cámara alta mucho más jóven.

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 133 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

∗

The authors wish to thank Mark Jones, Fabrice Lehoucq, Detlef Nolte, and the two anonymous reviews for their helpful comments. This research note presents some of the results obtained in a research project on the functions and functioning of the Senates in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay. This project was carried out between 2001 and 2004 at the Institut für Iberoamerika-Kunde (IIK) in Hamburg, Germany, with the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

References

References

Baron, M. 2002 Directorio Legislativo. Quiénes son nuestros legisladores y cómo nos representan. Buenos Aires: Universita di Bologna, Cippec, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Barros, Robert 2002 Constitutionalism and Dictatorship. Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, H., and Cotta, M. 2000 Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000. Legislative Careers and Recruitment in Eleven European Countries. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, J. 1999 “Partidos, coaliciones y el Congreso chileno en los años noventa.” Política y Gobierno 6 (2): 365–405. Mexico DF: CIDE.Google Scholar
Chasquetti, Daniel n.d. Renovación y reelección legislativa en Uruguay. 1985–1999. Working Paper No.22. Montevideo: Instituto de Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Danesi, Silvina 2004 “Dejando huellas. Prácticas políticas que impactan en el Senado de la Nación Argentina.” Iberoamericana 14:176–181. Berlín.Google Scholar
De Luca, Miguel 2004 “Political Recruitment of Presidents and Governors in the Argentine Party-Centered System.” Paper prepared for Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America Conference. Graylyn International Conference Center. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Gray, Tricia 2003 “Electoral Gender Quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 22 (1): 52–78.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, J. 1999 The Federalist Papers. New York: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. 1999 “Legislative Careers: Why and How We Should Study Them?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (2): 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union 2005 “Women in National Parliaments.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm (accessed August 2005).Google Scholar
Jones, Mark 1998 “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women. Lessons from the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark 2001 “Carreras políticas y disciplinas partidarias en la Cámara de Diputados argentina.” Postdata 7: 189–230.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark, Saiegh, Sebastian, Spiller, Pablo, and Tommasi, Mariano 2002 “Amateur Legislators-Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, Leany, and Ranincheski, Sonia 2003 “Carreras políticas en el Senado brasileño: un estudio de las composiciones del Pleno y de las Comisiones de Constitución, Justicia y Ciudadanía en la década del '90.” Lateinamerika Analysen 4: 3–30.Google Scholar
Leoni, Eduardo, Pereira, Carlos, and Rennó, Lúcio 2004 “Political Survival Strategies: Political Career Decisions in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.” The Jounal of Latin American Studies 36: 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt 1999 Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Llanos, Mariana, and Nolte, Detlef 2003 “Bicameralism in the Americas: Around the Extremes of Symmetry and Incongruence.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 9 (3). Frank Cass Publishers, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott 1995 “Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Parties and Party Systems in Latin America, Scott Mainwaring and Timothy Scully, eds., 355–398. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mastias, J., and Grangè, J. 1987 Les Seconde Chambres du Parlement en Europe Occidentale. Paris: Économica.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Guillermo, Palanza, Valeria, and Sin, Gisela 1999 Congreso, Presidencia y Justicia en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Temas.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott 2001 “Organized Factions and Disorganized Parties. Electoral Incentives in Uruguay” in Party Politics 7 (2): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott 2002 “Towards a Model of Latin American Legislatures.” In Morgerstern and Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. 1997 Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson 1968 “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review 62: 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy, and Mochel, Marilia 2004 “Political Recruitment in an Executive-Centric System: Presidents, Ministers, and Governors in Brazil”. Paper prepared for the conference Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Democracy in Latin America. Graylyn International Conference Center. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, April 3–4.Google Scholar
Rehren, Alfredo 2001 “La Presidencia y el Parlamento como instituciones representativas: los casos de Argentina, Chile y Francia.” Revista de Ciencia Política 21 (2): 122–151.Google Scholar
Riescher G., S. Ruß, and Haas, C., eds. 2000 Zweite Kammern. München/Wien: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. 1992 “The Justification of Bicameralism.” International Political Science Review 13 (1): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Meg 2000 Reforming the House of Lords. Lessons from Overseas. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David 2003 Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Fabiano 1999 “Recruitment and Retention of Legislators in Brazil” in Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (2): 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Fabiano 2000 “Deputados federais e institucões legislativas no Brasil: 1946–99.” In R.Boschi, E. Diniz and F.Santos (eds.) Elites políticas e Econômicas no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
Federal, Senado 2003 Senadores. Dados Biográficos. Qüinquagésima segunda legislatura (2003–2007). Brasilia: Senado Federal, Subsecretaria de Arquivo.Google Scholar
Siavelis, P. 2000 The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. and Money, J. 1997 Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriarte, Edurne 1997 “El análisis de las élites políticas en las democracias.” Revista de Estudios Políticos 97:249–275. España: Nueva Epoca.Google Scholar
Uriarte, Edurne 2000 “La política como vocación y profesión: Análisis de las motivaciones y de la carrera política de los diputados españoles.” Revista Española de Ciencia Política 2: 97–124. Madrid: AECPA.Google Scholar

Web Sites

http://www.parlamento.gub.uy/Google Scholar
http://www.senado.cl/Google Scholar
http://www.camara.cl/Google Scholar
http://www.camara.gov.br/Google Scholar
http://www.senado.gov.br/Google Scholar
http://www.diputados.gov.ar/Google Scholar
http://www.senado.gov.ar/Google Scholar

Data Bases

Proyecto de Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA) 1994–2005 Manuel Alcántara, Director. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Proyecto Funciones y Funcionamiento de los Senados del Cono Sur 2001–2004 Detlef Nolte, Director. Hamburg: Institut für Iberoamerika-kunde.Google Scholar