Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:02:27.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efectos de los Impuestos Corporativos en la Inversión Extranjera en América Latina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Claudio A. Agostini
Affiliation:
Ilades-Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
Ileana Raquel Jalile
Affiliation:
Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Durante los últimos años, varios países de América Latina han bajado las tasas de impuesto a las utilidades de las empresas, entre otras razones, con el objetivo de atraer más inversión extranjera. Sin embargo, dicha política sólo puede tener resultados significativos si la inversión extranjera es relativamente sensible a la tasa de impuestos. De lo contrario, el efecto principal se limitaría a una fuerte reducción en la recaudación tributaria. Desafortunadamente, para América Latina no hay evidencia empírica en la literatura económica que indique la magnitud de dicha elasticidad. Una primera contribución de este trabajo consiste precisamente en estimar la magnitud de los efectos tributarios en la inversión extranjera en América Latina. Una segunda contribución consiste en considerar explícitamente en el análisis empírico el hecho de que los inversionistas extranjeros tienen una outside option en sus alternativas de inversión y pueden decidir no invertir en ningún país de América Latina. La evidencia empírica en este trabajo, utilizando un modelo de elección discreta y un panel de once países en Latinoamérica para el período 1990–2002, muestra una elasticidad impuesto de la inversión extranjera entre –0.8 y –1.

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past few years, some Latin American countries have decreased their corporate income tax rates to attract foreign direct investment. However, such a policy will have a significant impact only if foreign investment is highly sensitive to tax rates. Otherwise, the main impact of a lower tax rate would be a decrease in tax revenue. Unfortunately there is no evidence in the economic literature for the magnitude of this elasticity in Latin American countries. The contribution of this article is twofold. First, it provides a consistent estimate of the foreign direct investment tax elasticity for Latin America. Second, it considers explicitly the fact that foreign investors have outside options and might decide not to invest in Latin America at all. If the empirical analysis does not consider the presence of outside options, the estimated elasticity will be biased.

The empirical evidence provided by this article, using a discrete choice model and a panel of eleven Latin American countries for 1990–2002, shows a point estimate of the tax elasticity of foreign direct investment that ranges between –0.5 and –0.9.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Latin American Studies Association

References

Referencias

Agosin, M., y Machado, R. 2007Openness and the International Allocation of Foreign Direct Investment”. Journal of Development Studies 43 (7): 12341247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostini, C. A. 2007The Effect of State Taxes on Investment Location”. Public Finance Review 35 (3): 335360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R., y Pain, N. 1999Trade Restraints and Japanese Direct Investment Inflows”. European Economic Review 43 (1): 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, P., y Husted, S. 1989Patterns and Determinants of Productive Efficiency in State Manufacturing”. Journal of Regional Science 29 (1): 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, C, Terza, J. V. y Arromdee, V. 1991State Characteristics and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment within the United States”. Review of Economics and Statistics 73:675683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mooij, R., y Ederveen, S. 2003Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment, A Synthesis of Empirical Research”. International Tax and Public Finance 10 (6): 673693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, M.A., Foley, C.F. y Hines, J.R. 2004Foreign Direct Investment in a World of Multiple Taxes”. Journal of Public Economics 88:27272744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveraux, M., y Griffith, R. 1998Taxes and the Location of Production: Evidence from a Panel of U.S. Multinationals”. Journal of Public Economics 68 (1): 335367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveraux, M., y Griffith, R. 1999The Taxation of Discrete Investment Choices”. Working Paper No. W98/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubert, H., y Mutti, J. 2000Do Taxes Influence Where U.S. Corporations Invest?National Tax Journal 53 (4): 825839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R., y Jorgenson, D. W. 1967Tax Policy and Investment Behavior”. American Economic Review 57:391414.Google Scholar
Helms, J. 1985The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Growth: A Time Series Cross-Section Approach”. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (4): 574582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, J. Jr. 1996Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America”. American Economic Review 86 (1): 10751094.Google Scholar
Hines, J. Jr. 1999Lessons from Behavioral Responses to International Taxation”. National Tax Journal 52 (2): 305322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D. W. 1963Capital Theory and Investment Behavior”. American Economic Review 53 (2): 247259.Google Scholar
Knight, B. 2002State Capital Taxes and the Location of Investment: Empirical Lessons from Theoretical Models of Tax Competition”. Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 59, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KPMG varios años “Corporate Tax Surveys” (http://www.kpmg.com).Google Scholar
Luger, M., y Shetty, S. 1985 “Determinants of Foreign Plant Start-Ups in the United States: Lessons for Policymakers in the Southeast”. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (Spring): 223–245.Google Scholar
Moore, M. O. 1993Determinants of German Manufacturing Direct Investment: 1980–1988”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129 (2): 120138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M., Steece, B. y Swenson, C. 1987An Analysis of the Impact of State Income Rates and Bases on Foreign Investment”. Accounting Review 62:671685.Google Scholar
Nevo, A. 2000A Practitioner's Guide to Estimation Random Coefficients Logit Models of Demand”. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 9 (1): 513548.Google Scholar
Papke, L. 1991Interstate Business Tax Differentials and New Firm Location: Evidence from Panel Data”. Journal of Public Economics 45 (1): 4768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, N., y Young, G. 1996Tax Competition and the Pattern of European Foreign Direct Investment”. Mimeo. National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers varios años “Corporate Taxation: A Worldwide Summary”, (http://www.pwcglobal.com).Google Scholar
Rork, J. 2003Coveting Thy Neighbors' Taxation”. National Tax Journal 56 (4): 775787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J. 1990Tax Effects on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Evidence from a Cross-Country Comparison”. En Taxation in the Global Economy, editado por Razin, Assaf and Slemrod, Joel, pp. 79122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swenson, D. 1994The Impact of US Tax Reform on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States”. Journal of Public Economics 54 (2): 243266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, D. 2001Transaction Type and the Effect of Taxes on the Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States”. En International Taxation and Multinational Activity, editado por Hines, J. R., pp. 89108. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuman, J. P., y Emmert, C. F. 2004The Political Economy of U.S. Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America”. Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD 2004 World Investment Directory: Latin American and the Caribbean, 2 vols. New York: United Nations Press.Google Scholar