Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:24:00.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Female Leadership and Sexual Health Policy in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Jennifer M. Piscopo
Jennifer M. Piscopo*
Affiliation:
Occidental College
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Latin American women's accession to executive and legislative office has been accompanied by the widespread expectation that their participation will change policies in ways that benefit women's lives. This article uses an in-depth case study of sexual health reform in Argentina to explore the leadership and coalition-building activities of key political actors. As a case study, the article moves beyond critical mass theories, which argue that women's greater presence will result in gender policy reform. Rather, the article demonstrates that women's inclusion, even at high percentages, generates statutory change only when specific leaders build momentum for reform through issue networks and diverse coalitions. More important, leaders must mobilize resources within civil society and across government branches to ensure that successful policies are enacted. Whether Latin American women enjoy material changes thus depends on whether their leaders are committed to passing and implementing gender reforms.

Resumen

Resumen

La presencia de mujeres latinoamericanas en cargos políticos representativos ha ido en ascenso en los últimos años. ¿Han logrado traducir esta participación en políticas de género que benefician a las mujeres? Para contestar esta pregunta, este trabajo estudia el papel del liderazgo de actores políticos y de la formación de coaliciones en las reformas argentinas a las políticas de salud reproductiva. El análisis cuestiona las teorías de masa crítica, las cuales proponen que la presencia de mujeres legisladoras es suficiente para lograr reformas. Este trabajo, en cambio, demuestra que la inclusión de las mujeres, aún en grandes números, sólo genera cambios estatutarios cuando el liderazgo político logra cobrar velocidad para la reforma mediante redes y coaliciones diversas. Además, es imprescindible que los o las líderes movilicen recursos a través de la sociedad civil y de las instituciones públicas para asegurar que las reformas sean implementadas en la práctica. Que las políticas de género se vean reflejadas en beneficios materiales para las mujeres latinas depende del compromiso de sus líderes en aprobar e implementar estas políticas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , 2014 , pp. 104 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

The author thanks Peter H. Smith, Susan Franceschet, Jordi Díez, discussants at the 2009 Latin American Studies Association conference, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this piece. Support for this research was received from the Institute of International, Comparative, and Area Studies at the University of California, San Diego, and the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics at Iowa State University.

References

Barrancos, Dora 2006 “Problematic Modernity: Gender, Sexuality, and Reproduction in Twentieth-Century Argentina.” Journal of Women's History 18 (6): 123–150.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike 2008 “Women's Choices in Comparative Perspective: Abortion Policies in Late-Developing Catholic Countries.” Comparative Politics 40 (4): 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blofield, Merike, and Haas, Leisl 2005 “Defining a Democracy: Reforming the Laws on Women's Rights in Chile, 1990–2002.” Latin American Politics and Society 47 (3): 35–68.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike, and Haas, Leisl 2011 “Gender Equality Policies in Latin America.” In The Great Gap: Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America, edited by Blofield, Merike, 278–309. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah 2008 “The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 419–425.Google Scholar
Cesilini, Sandra, and Gherardi, Natalia 2002 Los límites de la ley: La salud reproductiva en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: World Bank.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena 2006 “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Politics and Gender 2 (4): 522–530.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena 2008 “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–736.Google Scholar
CONDERS (Consorcio Nacional por los Derechos Reproductivos y Sexuales) 2003 “Situación de la atención de la salud sexual y reproductiva: Diagnóstico desde la perspectiva de los/las usuarios.” Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
CONDERS (Consorcio Nacional por los Derechos Reproductivos y Sexuales) 2008 “Situación de la atención y promoción de la salud sexual y reproductiva, Argentina, 2003–2008.” Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude 1988 “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude 2006 Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DAWN (Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era) 2004 “Situación de la salud y el aborto en Argentina.” Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
Eltantawy, Nahed 2008 “Pots, Pans, and Protests: Women's Strategies for Resisting Globalization in Argentina.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 5 (1): 46–63.Google Scholar
Faur, Eleanor, and Gherardi, Natalia 2005 “Sexualidades y reproducción: La perspectiva de los derechos humanos.” In Informe sobre género y derechos humanos: Vigencia y respeto de los derechos de las mujeres en Argentina, edited by the Equipo Latinoamericano de Justicia y Género, 169–206. Buenos Aires: Biblos.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan 2010 “Explaining Domestic Violence Policy Outcomes in Chile and Argentina.” Latin American Politics and Society 52 (3): 1–29.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2008 “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics and Gender 4 (3): 393–425.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay 2009 “Re(gion)alizing Women's Human Rights in Latin America.” Politics and Gender 5 (3): 349–375.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala 2003 Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Weldon, S. Laurel 2010 “When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 207–216.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch 2005 “Decisions Denied: Women's Access to Contraception and Abortion in Argentina.” Human Rights Watch 17 (1): 1–87.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane S., ed. 2009 Feminist Agendas and Democracy in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997 “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 613–629.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, Wonjae 2005 “Provincial Party Bosses: Keystone of the Argentine Congress.” In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, 115–138. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 1977 “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.Google Scholar
Kohen, Beatriz 2009 “The Effectiveness of Legal Strategies in Argentina.” In Feminist Agendas and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Jaquette, Jane S., 83–112. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liscia, María di 2009 “Las luchas por los derechos sexuales y reproductivos.” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association Conference, Rio de Janeiro, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Lopreite, Debora 2008 “Challenging the Argentina Gender Regime? The Politics of Reproductive Rights after Democratization.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane 2005 “Quota Problems: Combating the Dangers of Essentialism.” Politics and Gender 1 (4): 622–638.Google Scholar
Marx, Jutta, Borner, Jutta, and Caminotti, Mariana 2009 “Gender Quotas, Candidate Selection, and Electoral Campaigns: Comparing Argentina and Brazil.” In Feminist Agendas and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Jaquette, Jane S., 45–64. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McBride, Dorothy E., and Mazur, Amy G. 2010 The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Novick, Susana 2002 “Democracia y fecundidad: Políticas relacionadas con la salud reproductiva y la anticoncepción; Argentina, 1983–2001.” Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Pecheny, Mario, and Petracci, Mónica 2007 Derechos humanos y sexualidad. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia 1981 “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–716.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010 Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Linda S. 1999 “Gender Politics in the Mexican Democratization Process.” In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, edited by Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro, 57–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna Michelle 2003 “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities Than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women and Politics 24 (4): 77–101.Google Scholar
Torre, Juan Carlos 2005 “Citizens Versus Political Class: The Crisis of Partisan Representation.” In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, 165–180. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina 2000 “Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidation in Argentina and Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (3): 765–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel 2002 “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar