Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:33:02.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Labor Politics to Machine Politics: The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Steven Levitsky
Steven Levitsky*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Argentine (Peronist) Justicialista Party (PJ) underwent a far-reaching coalitional transformation during the 1980s and 1990s. Party reformers dismantled Peronism's traditional mechanisms of labor participation, and clientelist networks replaced unions as the primary linkage to the working and lower classes. By the early 1990s, the PJ had transformed from a labor-dominated party into a machine party in which unions were relatively marginal actors. This process of de-unionization was critical to the PJ's electoral and policy success during the presidency of Carlos Menem (1989–99). The erosion of union influence facilitated efforts to attract middle-class votes and eliminated a key source of internal opposition to the government's economic reforms. At the same time, the consolidation of clientelist networks helped the PJ maintain its traditional working- and lower-class base in a context of economic crisis and neoliberal reform. This article argues that Peronism's radical de-unionization was facilitated by the weakly institutionalized nature of its traditional party-union linkage. Although unions dominated the PJ in the early 1980s, the rules of the game governing their participation were always informal, fluid, and contested, leaving them vulnerable to internal changes in the distribution of power. Such a change occurred during the 1980s, when office-holding politicians used patronage resources to challenge labor's privileged position in the party. When these politicians gained control of the party in 1987, Peronism's weakly institutionalized mechanisms of union participation collapsed, paving the way for the consolidation of machine politics—and a steep decline in union influence—during the 1990s.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , 2003 , pp. 3 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

∗

The author thanks Sarah Brooks, Sebastián Etchemendy, Frances Hagopian, James McGuire, María Victoria Murillo, Kenneth Roberts, Juan Carlos Torre, and five anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this article.

∗∗

See Appendix 1 for a list of acronyms used in the text.

References

REFERENCES

ABÓS, ALVARO 1986 El Posperonismo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Legasa.Google Scholar
AUYERO, JAVIER 1998 “(Re)Membering Peronism. An Ethnographic Account of the Relational Character of Political Memory.” Paper delivered at the XXI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, 24–26 September.Google Scholar
AUYERO, JAVIER 2000 Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BÁRBARO, JULIO 1985 “Peronismo y Sindicalismo.” Unidos 3, no. 6 (August): 149–52.Google Scholar
BRUSCO, VALERIA, NAZARENO, MARCELO, and STOKES, SUSAN C. 2002 “Clientelism and Democracy: Evidence from Argentina.” Paper prepared for presentation at the conference on Political Parties and Legislative Organization in Parliamentary and Presidential Regimes, Yale University, March.Google Scholar
BURGESS, KATRINA 1999 “Loyalty Dilemmas and Market Reform: Party-Union Alliances Under Stress in Mexico, Spain, and Venezuela.” World Politics 52, no. 1 (October): 105–34.Google Scholar
BURGESS, KATRINA, and LEVITSKY, STEVEN 2003 “Explaining Populist Party Adaptation in Latin America: Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela.” Comparative Political Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANTON, DARÍO 1986 El pueblo legislador: Las elecciones de 1983. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de America Latina.Google Scholar
CARNOTA, FERNANDO, and TALPONE, ESTEBAN 1995 El palacio de la corrupción: Droga, negociados y enriquecimiento en el Consejo Deliberante. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
CASTELLS, MANUEL, and PORTES, ALEJANDRO 1989 “World Underneath: The Origins, Dynamics, and Effects of the Informal Economy.” In The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, edited by Portes, Alejandro, Castells, Manuel, and Benton, Lauren A. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
CATTERBERG, EDGARDO 1991 Argentina Confronts Politics: Political Culture and Public Opinion in the Argentine Transition to Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
CATTERBERG, EDGARDO, and BRAUN, MARIA 1989 “Las elecciones presidenciales argentinas del 14 de mayo de 1989: la ruta a la normalidad.” Desarrollo Económico 115 (October-December): 361–74.Google Scholar
CORDEU, MORA, MERCADO, SILVIA, and SOSA, NANCY 1985 Peronismo: la mayoría perdida. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana-Planeta.Google Scholar
CORRALES, JAVIER 2000 “Presidents, Ruling Parties, and Party Rules: A Theory on the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 32, no. 2 (January): 127–50.Google Scholar
CORRALES, JAVIER 2002 Presidents without Parties. Economic Reforms in Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
DALTON, RUSSELL)., FLANAGAN, SCOTT C., and BECK, PAUL ALLEN 1984 “Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, edited by Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Paul Allen Beck. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DÍAZ CAYEROS, ALBERTO, ESTÉVEZ, FEDERICO, and MAGALONI, BEATRIZ 2001 “A Portfolio Diversification Model of Electoral Investment: Competition and Policy Choice in Mexico's PRONASOL, 1989–1994.” Paper prepared for the 97th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, Calif., 30 August–2 September.Google Scholar
DOWNS, ANTHONY 1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
DRESSER, DENISE 1991 “Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program.” Current Issue Brief, No. 3. U.S.-Mexico Policy Briefs. La Jolla: University of California San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
ESPING-ANDERSEN, GØSTA 1999 “Politics without Class: Postindustrial Cleavages in Europe and America.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ETCHEMENDY, SEBASTIAN, and PALERMO, VICENTE 1998 “Conflicto y concertación: gobierno, congreso y organizaciones de interés en la reforma laboral del primer gobierno de Menem.” Desarollo Económico 37, no. 148 (January-March): 559–90.Google Scholar
FRAGA, ROSENDO 1995 Argentina en las urnas, 1916–1994. Buenos Aires: Editorial Centro de Estudios Unión para la Nueva Mayoría.Google Scholar
FREIDENBERG, FLAVIA, and LEVITSKY, STEVEN 2002 “Organizaciones partidistas e institucionalización informal en America Latina.” Paper prepared for the Latin American Congress of Political Science, University of Salamanca, 9–11 July.Google Scholar
GARCÍA, RAÚL ALBERTO, and MONTENEGRO, NÉSTOR, EDS. 1986 Hablan los renovadores. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de la Galera.Google Scholar
GEDDES, BARBARA 1994 Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GERCHUNOFF, PABLO, and TORRE, JUAN CARLOS 1996 “La política de liberalización económica en la administración de Menem.” Desarrollo Económico 36, no. 143 (October-December): 733–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GERVASONI, CARLOS 1997 “La sustentabilidad electoral de los programas de estabilización y reforma estructural: los casos de Argentina y Perú.” Paper prepared for the XX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Guadalajara, Mexico, 17–19 April.Google Scholar
GERVASONI, CARLOS 1998 “Del distribucionalismo al neoliberalismo: los cambios en la coalición electoral peronista durante el gobierno de Menem.” Paper prepared for the XXI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, IL, 24–26 September.Google Scholar
GIBSON, EDWARD 1996 Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
GIBSON, EDWARD 1997 “The Populist Road to Market Reform: Policy and Electoral Coalitions in Mexico and Argentina.” World Politics 49, no. 2 (April): 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIBSON, EDWARD, and CALVO, ERNESTO 2000 “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35, no. 3 (Fall): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUTIERREZ, RICARDO 1998 “Desindicalización y cambio organizativo del peronismo argentino, 1982–1995.” Paper presented at the XXI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, IL, 24–26 September.Google Scholar
HARMEL, ROBERT, and JANDA, KENNETH 1994 “An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6, no. 3: 259–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWELL, CHRIS, and DALEY, ANTHONY 1992 “The Transformation of Political Exchange.” International Journal of Political Economy 22, no. 4: 3–16.Google Scholar
INGLEHART, RONALD 1977 The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION 1999 Informe América Latina y el Caribe: Panorama Laboral '99. Lima: ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
JAMES, DANIEL 1988 Resistance and Integration: Peronism and the Argentine Working Class, 1946–1976. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
JEPPERSON, RONALD 1991 “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KITSCHELT, HERBERT 1994 The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
KITSCHELT, HERBERT 2000 “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 33, nos. 6–7 (August-September): 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOELBLE, THOMAS 1991 The Left Unraveled: Social Democracy and the New Left Challenge. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
KOELBLE, THOMAS 1992 “Recasting Social Democracy in Europe: A Nested Games Explanation of Strategic Adjustment in Political Parties.” Politics and Society 20, no. 2 (March): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEVITSKY, STEVEN 1999 “From Laborism to Liberalism: Institutionalization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation in Argentina (1983–1997).” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
LEVITSKY, STEVEN 2001a “A ‘Disorganized Organization’: Informal Organization and the Persistence of Local Party Structures in Argentine Peronism.” Journal of Latin American Studies 33, no. 1.Google Scholar
LEVITSKY, STEVEN 2001b “Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: The Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective.” World Politics 54, no. 1 (October): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEVITSKY, STEVEN 2003 Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LÓPEZ ECHAGÜE, HERNAN 1996 El otro: una biografia de Eduardo Duhalde. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
MAINWARING, SCOTT 1999 Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAINWARING, SCOTT, and SCULLY, TIMOTHY R., EDS. 1995 Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MCGUIRE, JAMES W. 1995 “Political Parties and Democracy in Argentina.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MCGUIRE, JAMES W. 1997 Peronism Without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MORA Y ARAUJO, MANUEL, and LLORENTE, IGNACIO, EDS. 1980 El voto peronista: ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
MURILLO, MARÍA VICTORIA 1997 “Union Politics, Market-Oriented Reforms, and the Reshaping of Argentine Corporatism.” In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Representation and Participation, edited by Chalmers, Douglas A., Vivas, Carlos M., Hite, Katherine, Martin, Scott B., Piester, Kerianne, and Segarra, Monique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MURILLO, MARÍA VICTORIA 2001 Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NORTH, DOUGLASS C. 1990 “A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, no. 4: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSTIGUY, PIERRE 1998 “Peronism and Anti-Peronism: Class-Cultural Cleavages and Political Identity in Argentina.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
PALERMO, VICENTE 1986 “Transformación social: partido y sindicatos.” Unidos 4, no. 11–12: 75–87.Google Scholar
PALERMO, VICENTE, and NOVARO, MARCOS 1996 Política y poder en el gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma Ensayo.Google Scholar
PALOMINO, HECTOR 1987 Cambios ocupacionales y sociales en Argentina, 1947–1985. Buenos Aires: CISEA (Centro de Investigaciones Sociales sobre el Estado y la Administración).Google Scholar
PANEBIANCO, ANGELO 1988 Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PIAZZA, JAMES 2001 “De-linking Labor: Labor Unions and Social Democratic Parties under Globalization.” Party Politics 7, no. 4 (July): 413–35.Google Scholar
POWERS, NANCY 1995 “The Politics of Poverty in Argentina in the 1990s.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 37, no. 4: 89–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBERTS, KENNETH 1995 “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (October): 82–116.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, KENNETH 1998 Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, KENNETH 2002a “Social Inequalities without Class Inequalities in Latin America's Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36, no. 4 (winter): 3–33.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, KENNETH 2002b “Party-Society Linkages and Democratic Representation in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 27, no. 53: 9–34.Google Scholar
SCOTT, JAMES C. 1969 “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63: 1142–1158.Google Scholar
SHEFTER, MARTIN 1994 Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
SMITH, WILLIAM 1989 Authoritarianism and the Crisis of the Argentine Political Economy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
STOKES, SUSAN C. 2001 Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism By Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAYLOR, ANDREW 1993 “Trade Unions and the Politics of Social Democratic Renewal.” In Rethinking Social Democracy in Western Europe, edited by Gillespie, Richard and Paterson, William E. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
TORRE, JUAN CARLOS 1983 Los sindicalistas en el gobierno, 1973–1976. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
TORRE, JUAN CARLOS 1990 La vieja guardia sindical y Perón: sobre los orígenes del peronismo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
VILLARREAL, JUAN 1987 “Changes in Argentine Society: the Heritage of the Dictatorship.” In Military Rule to Liberal Democracy in Argentina, edited by Peralta-Ramos, Monica and Waisman, Carlos. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
WAISBORD, SILVIO 1995 El gran desfile. Campañas electorales y medios de comunicación en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
WARNER, CAROLYN M. 1997 “Political Parties and the Opportunity Costs of Patronage.” Party Politics 3, no. 4: 553–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEYLAND, KURT 1996 “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31, no. 1: 3–31.Google Scholar
WEYLAND, KURT 1999 “Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 31, no. 4: 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILSON, JAMES Q. 1995 Political Organizations (1973). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
ZUCKER, LYNNE G. 1977 “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” American Sociological Review 42 (October): 726–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar