Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:03:40.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Wine in New Bottles?: Corporatism in Latin America

Review products

THE NEW CORPORATISM: SOCIAL-POLITICAL STRUCTURES IN THE IBERIAN WORLD. Edited by PIKEFREDRICK B. and STRITCHTHOMAS. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974. Pp. 218.)
AUTHORITARIANISM AND CORPORATISM IN LATIN AMERICA. Edited by MALLOYJAMES M. (Pittsburgh, Penn.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1977. Pp. 549. $5.95.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Alberto Ciria
Alberto Ciria*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Books in Review
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , 1978 , pp. 211 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the University of Texas Press

References

Notes

1. See also Ronald C. Newton, “On ‘Functional Groups,’ ‘Fragmentation,’ and ‘Pluralism’ in Spanish American Political Society,” HAHR 50, no. 1 (Feb. 1970):1–29; Howard J. Wiarda, “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin Tradition: The Corporative Model,” World Politics 25, no. 2 (Jan. 1973): 206–35; Wiarda (ed.), Politics and Social Change in Latin America: The Distinct Tradition (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1974); James A. Morris and Steve C. Ropp, “Corporatism and Dependent Development: A Honduran Case Study,” LARR 12, no. 2 (1977):27–68.

2. In my opinion, these divergences, important as they may be, are not essential for the purposes of the general arguments presented in this review.

3. Richard R. Fagen, “Studying Latin American Politics: Some Implications of a Dependencia Approach,” LARR 12, no. 2 (1977): 10 (author's emphasis).

4. For useful discussions of dependence theory (theories), imperialism, etc., see the issues of Latin American Perspectives, especially 1, no. 1 (Spring 1974); 2, no. 2 (Spring 1975); and 3, no. 4 (Fall 1976).

5. In this vein, see Guillermo O'Donnell, “Estado y alianzas en la Argentina, 1956–1976,” Documento CEDES/G.E. CLACSO, Buenos Aires, no. 5 (October 1976), and “Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State,” LARR 13, no. 1 (1978):3–38.