Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:37:55.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ORGANIZED MIGRANTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY FROM AFAR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Katrina Burgess
Katrina Burgess*
Affiliation:
Fletcher School, Tufts University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article contributes to a growing literature on the ways in which migrants are shaping democracy back home. Its empirical lens is Mexico's “Three-for-One” (3×1) Program, in which each level of the Mexican government provides matching grants for community projects solicited and financed by migrant hometown associations (HTAs), primarily in the United States. Based on an original data set constructed from key informant interviews and household surveys in sixty Mexican communities, it uses descriptive statistics, multivariate regressions, and qualitative case narratives to explore the relationship between migrant involvement in the 3×1 Program and accountable governance at the local level. Its central finding is that migrants are most likely to act as effective agents of accountability when they are embedded in translocal networks with local residents.

Resumen

RESUMEN

Este artículo contribuye a una creciente literatura sobre el impacto de los migrantes en la calidad de la democracia en sus países de origen. Su lente empírica es el programa mexicano “Tres por Uno” (3×1), en la que cada nivel del gobierno mexicano otorga donaciones para proyectos comunitarios solicitados y financiados por clubes de oriundos, principalmente en los Estados Unidos. Basado en un conjunto de datos original construido a partir de entrevistas a informantes clave y encuestas de hogares en sesenta comunidades mexicanas, utiliza la estadística descriptiva, regresiones multivariantes, y narraciones de casos cualitativos para explorar la relación entre la participación de los migrantes en el Programa 3×1 y la rendición de cuentas en el ámbito local. Su principal conclusión es que los migrantes tienen más probabilidades de actuar como agentes eficaces de rendición de cuentas cuando se insertan en redes translocales con los residentes locales.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2016 , pp. 150 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

I am grateful to Merilee Grindle, Stephan Haggard, Clarisa Pérez Armendáriz, and several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article, which 1 presented at the UCLA Migration Studies Group, the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, and the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies at UC San Diego. I am also deeply indebted to my research teams, particularly Beatriz Tinajero, Rodolfo Córdova, Mireya Torres, and Liz Yepsen, whose work was made possible by generous funding from the Tinker Foundation, the Civic Engagement Research Group and the Fletcher School at Tufts University, and the Global Equity Initiative at Harvard University.

References

REFERENCES

Abdih, Yasser, Chami, Ralph, Dagher, Jihad, and Montiel, Peter 2012 “Remittances and Institutions: Are Remittances a Curse?” World Development 40 (4): 657–666.Google Scholar
Ackerman, John 2004 “Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond ‘Exit’ and ‘Voice.‘” World Development 32 (3): 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Faisal Z. 2012 “The Perils of Unearned Foreign Income: Aid, Remittances, and Government Survival.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Faisal Z. 2013 “Remittances Deteriorate Governance.” Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (4): 1166–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, Francisco Javier, and Meseguer, Covadonga 2012 “Collective Remittances and the State: The 3×1 Program in Mexican Municipalities.” World Development 40 (1): 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asis, Maruja M. B., and Roma, Golda Myra 2010 “Eyes on the Prize: Towards a Migration and Development Agenda in the Philippines.” In Brick by Brick: Building Cooperation between the Philippines and Migrants' Associations in Italy and Spain, edited by Baggio, Fabio, 35–137. Manila: Scalabrini Migration Center.Google Scholar
Axworthy, Thomas 2005 “The Accountability Ladder: Five Steps Toward Democracy.” Paper presented at First Biennial Conference, World Forum for Democratization in Asia, Taipei.Google Scholar
Bada, Xóchitl 2011 “Participatory Planning across Borders: Mexican Migrant Civic Engagement in Community Development.” Latin Americanist 5 (4): 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bada, Xóchitl 2014 Mexican Hometown Associations in Chicagoacán. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab K., and Mookherjee, Dilip 2006 Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batista, Catia, and Vicente, Pedro C. 2011 “Do Migrants Improve Governance at Home? Evidence from a Voting Experiment.” World Bank Economic Review 25 (1): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunhill Grau, Nuria 2003 Responsabilización por el control social. Costa Rica: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay, and Morlino, Leonardo 2005 Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Duquette, Lauren 2011 “Making Democracy Work from Abroad: Remittances, Hometown Associations, and Migrant-State Coproduction of Public Goods in Mexico” PhD diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Escribà-Folch, Abel, Meseguer, Covadonga, and Wright, Joseph 2015 “Remittances and Democratization.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan 2005 “Mapping Mexican Migrant Civil Society.” Background paper prepared for seminar, “Mexican Migrant Civic and Political Participation,” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan 2007 Accountability Politics: Power and Voice in Rural Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Bada, Xóchitl 2008 “Migrant Organization and Hometown Impacts in Rural Mexico.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2-3): 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galatowitsch, Diane 2009 “Co-Development in Mali: A Case Study of a Development Phenomenon Exploited by Immigration Policy.” Paper No. 737, Independent Study Project Collection, School of International Training Graduate Institute. http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/737.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie, and Jenkins, Rob 2005 Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy Work for Human Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldring, Luin 2002 “The Mexican State and Transmigrant Organizations: Negotiating the Boundaries of Membership and Participation.” Latin American Research Review 37 (3): 55–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee 2007 Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grootaert, C., and Bastelaer, T. Van, eds. 2002 The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarnizo, Luis, Portes, Alejandro, and Haller, William 2003 “Assimilation and Transnationalism: Determinants of Transnational Political Action among Contemporary Migrants.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (6): 1211–1248.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David A. 2004 “Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition.” PS: Political Science & Politics 3:409–414.Google Scholar
Kapur, Devesh, and Webb, Richard 2000 Governance-Related Conditionalities of the International Financial Institutions. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Lamba-Nieves, Deepak 2014 “Empowering Cooperation: Dominican Hometown Associations and the Politics of Transnational Community Development.” PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lanly, Guillaume, and Hamann, Volker 2004 “Solidaridades transfronterizas y la emergencia de una sociedad civil transnacional: La participación de dos clubes de migrantes en el desarrollo local del Occidente de México.” In Clubes de migrantes oriundos mexicanos en los Estados Unidos: La política transnacional de la nueva sociedad civil migrante, edited by Lanly, Guillaume and V., M. Basilia Valenzuela, 127–174. Guadalajara: Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy 2001 The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Peggy, and Lamba-Nieves, Deepak 2010 “It's Not Just the Economy, Stupid—Social Remittances Revisited.” Migration Information Source (May 21). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Liamzon, Cristina 2010 Enhancing the Giving Practices of Filipino Diaspora Groups through Social Accountability Mechanisms: A Scoping Study. Manila: Affiliated Network for Social Accountability in East Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott 2003 “Introduction: Democratic Accountability in Latin America.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, edited by Welna, Christopher and Mainwaring, Scott, 3–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, Valentina, and Kabki, Mirjam 2009 “Small in Beautiful: The Micro-Politics of Transnational Relationships between Ghanaian Hometown Associations and Communities Back Home.” Global Networks 9 (2): 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga, and Aparicio, Francisco Javier 2012 “Migration and Distributive Politics: The Political Economy of Mexico's 3×1 Program.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (4): 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montambeault, Françoise 2011 “Overcoming Clientelism through Local Participatory Institutions in Mexico: What Type of Participation?” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (1): 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1998 “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olvera, Alberto J., ed. 2003 Voice, Eyes and Ears: Social Accountability in Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Orozco, Manuel 2003 Hometown Associations and Their Present and Future Partnerships: New Development Opportunities? Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Orozco, Manuel, and Rouse, Rebecca 2007 Migrant Hometown Associations and Opportunities for Development: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: Migration Information Source.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Smulovitz, Catalina 2006 Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Eric 2003 “Transnational Migration and Development in Postwar Peripheral States: An Examination of Guatemalan and Salvadoran State Linkages with Their Migrant Populations in Los Angeles.” Current Sociology 51 (3-4): 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993 Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N., and Czempiel, Ernst Otto 1992 Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I. 2004 “Strengthening Governance: Ranking Countries Would Help.” Washington Quarterly 28 (1): 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 1999 “Conceptualizing Accountability.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, edited by Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry Jay, and Plattner, Marc F.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedesol 2004 “Reglas de operación del Programa Iniciativa Ciudadana 3×1.” Diario Oficial de la Federación. March 5. Mexico City: Secretaría de Gobernación.Google Scholar
Sedesol 2010 Guía operativa de contraloría social, Programa 3×1 para Migrantes. Mexico City: Sedesol, SFP. http://mexicotaller.org/Documentos_files/GuiaOperativa.pdf.Google Scholar
Sedesol 2011 The 3×1 Program for Migrants. http://www.au.int/en/sites/default/files/Mexico_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Sedesol 2013 Reglas de operación del Programa 3×1 para Migrantes. Diario Oficial, December 27.Google Scholar
Shannon, Amy 2010 “Las organizaciones transnacionales como agentes del desarrollo local: Retos y oportunidades del Programa 3×1 para Migrantes.” In El Programa 3×1 para Migrantes: Primera política transnacional en México?, edited by de Castro, Rafael Fernandez, Zamora, Rodolfo Garcia, and Freyer, Ana Vila, 85–97. Mexico City: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael P., and Bakker, Matt 2008 Citizenship across Borders: The Political Transnationalism of El Migrante. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert C. 2003 “Migrant Membership as an Instituted Process: Transnationalization, the State and the Extra-Territorial Conduct of Mexican Politics.” International Migration Review 37 (2): 297–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smouts, Marie-Claude 2002 “The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinajero, Beatriz 2008 “Collective Remittances Flow and Impact: A Function of Social Capital?” Master of Law and Diplomacy (MALD) thesis, Fletcher School, Tufts University.Google Scholar
Tyburski, Michael D. 2012 “The Resource Curse Reversed? Remittances and Corruption in Mexico.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (2): 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Development Programme 1997 “Governance for Sustainable Development.” http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy/.Google Scholar
UN Secretariat 2006 Definition of Basic Concepts and Terminologies in Governance and Public Administration: Note. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Villacres, Daniela 2011 “From Subjects to Citizens: Migrant Hometown Associations as Vehicles for Deepening Democracy.” PhD diss., Brown University.Google Scholar
Waldinger, Roger 2015 The Cross-Border Connection: Immigrants, Emigrants, and Their Homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldinger, Roger, Popkin, Eric, and Magana, Hector Aquiles 2008 “Conflict and Contestation in the Cross-Border Community: Hometown Associations Reassessed.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31:843–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2000 “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges.” Third World Quarterly 21 (5): 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Heather 2012 “Both Sides Now: Migrant Philanthropy, State Power, and the Struggle for Accountability in Zacatecas, Mexico.” In Politics from Afar: Transnational Diasporas and Networks, edited by Mandaville, Peter and Lyons, Terence, 45–67. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar