Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:32:48.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Popular Comics and Authoritarian Injustice Frames in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Leticia Neria  and
Mark Aspinwall
Leticia Neria
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Estado de México
Mark Aspinwall
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Analysts of social movements have done a great deal to extend our understanding of how resistance groups frame injustices. They often assume that some form of collective (discursive) action is necessary to frame common understandings, but in many authoritarian regimes collective action is not tolerated. Instead, opposition is expressed in messages embedded in comics, films, and other images generated by popular culture. In this article we connect the literature on social movements and framing to the psychological and cultural understandings of humor, and specifically how text and images in humorous comics form a response to official frames of social peace, modernization, and development. Even when no one dares to write a letter of protest, or take to the streets, or set up a website, the political content of comics establishes understandings about group identity and justice. In more open and democratic regimes, dissident leaders are permitted to manipulate images and understandings. In closed authoritarian regimes, comics are “ready meals” for dissidents. We examine humorous comics in Mexico from 1970 to 1976 to show how text and images spoke of injustices such as torture, poverty, and marginalization.

Resumo

Resumo

Los especialistas en movimientos sociales ya han hecho un gran trabajo para ampliar el conocimiento acerca de cómo los grupos de resistencia colocan en marcos (frames) las injusticias. A menudo, asumen que alguna forma de acción colectiva (discursiva) es necesaria para enmarcar las formas comunes de pensar, pero en diversos regímenes autoritarios, la acción colectiva no es tolerada. En estos casos, la oposición es expresada en mensajes, los cuales están insertos en historietas, películas y otras imágenes generadas en la cultura popular. En este artículo, hacemos una conexión entre los trabajos acerca de movimientos sociales y frames, con los estudios psicológicos y culturales acerca del humor, y discutimos específicamente cómo el texto y las imágenes en las historietas humorísticas se convierten en una respuesta a los frames oficiales de paz social, modernización y desarrollo. Incluso cuando nadie se atreve a escribir una carta de protesta, o salir a manifestarse a las calles, o hacerlo a través de internet, su contenido político establece un conocimiento sobre la identidad del grupo y su forma de entender la justicia. En regímenes más abiertos y democráticos, se les permite a los líderes disidentes manipular imágenes y perspectivas. En regímenes cerrados y autoritarios, las historietas son una especie de “objeto pre-armado” para los disidentes. En este trabajo revisamos historietas de humor en México de 1970-1976 para probar cómo el texto y las imágenes hablaron de injusticias tales como la tortura, la pobreza y la marginalización.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , 2016 , pp. 22 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Kate Kobylka for her research assistance.

References

Agnew, Bob 2004 “¡Viva la Revolución! Los Agachados and the Worldview of Eduardo del Río (Rius).” Studies in Latin American Popular Culture 23:1–20.Google Scholar
Aguilar Camín, Héctor 1982 Saldos de la revolución: Cultura y política de México, 1910-1980. Mexico City: Nueva Imagen.Google Scholar
Agustín, José 2007 Tragicomedia mexicana, Vol. 2, La vida en Mexico de 1970 a 1988. 2nd ed. Mexico City: Planeta.Google Scholar
Aziz Nassif, Alberto 2004 “La construcción de la democracia electoral.” In Una historia contemporánea de México, Vol. 1, Transformaciones y permanencias, edited by Bizberg, Ilán, Meyer, Lorenzo, Alba, Francisco, 367–428. Mexico City: Océano.Google Scholar
Bartra, Armando 2001 “Debut, beneficio y despedida de una narrativa tumultaria 1: Piel de papel; Los pepines en la educación sentimental del mexicano.” Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre la Historieta 2 (1): 67–90.Google Scholar
Basañez, Miguel 1999 El pulso de los sexenios: 20 años de crisis en México. 4th ed. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A. 2000 “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez Carrillo, Maira 2010 Gabriel Vargas: Cronista gráfico. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo.Google Scholar
Benton, Gregor 1988 “The Origins of the Political Joke.” In Humor in Society: Resistance and Control, edited by Powell, Chris and Paton, George E. C., 33–55. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri 1911 Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. 1992 “Another Book on Laughter and Misunderstandings: A Field Guide to Chuckles, Smiles and Guffaws.” PhD diss., University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Casetti, Francesco, and di Chio, Federico 2007 Cómo analizar un film. Translated by Losilla, Carlos. Colección Comunicación: Cine, 172. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Castellanos, Laura 2007 México armado 1943-1981. México: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
Coerver, Don M., Pasztor, Suzanne B., and Buffington, Robert M. 2004 Mexico: An Encyclopedia of Contemporary Culture and History. California: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Condés Lara, Enrique 1998 “Años de rebelión y de esperanzas,” In Asalto al cielo: Lo que no se ha dicho del 68, edited by Robles, Rubén Aréchiga, Lara, Enrique Condés, Meléndez, Jorge, Juárez, Joel Ortega, and Hurtado, Jorge Poo, 21–41. Mexico City: Océano.Google Scholar
Cordera Campos, Rolando 1993 “Del desarrollo como crisis y de la crisis como transición.” In México a fines de siglo, edited by Blanco, José Joaquín and Woldenberg, José, 266–308. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon 2002 On Humor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, Christie 1998 Jokes and Their Relation to Society. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
del Río, Eduardo 2004 Los Agachados de Rius: Selección de la gran historieta de los años setentas. Mexico City: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
DelLa Porta, Donatella 1999 “Protest, Protesters and Protest Policing: Public Discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s.” In How Social Movements Matter, edited by Guigni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles, 66–96. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Randy, and Smith, Matthew J. 2009 The Power of Comics: History, Form and Culture. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1979 The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 1989 “Los marcos de la ‘libertad’ cómica.” In ¡Carnaval!, edited by Eco, Umberto, Ivanov, V. V., Rector, Mónica, 9–20. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 2000 Lector in fabula: La cooperación interpretativa en el texto narrativo. Barcelona: Editorial Lumen.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto 2007 El superhombre de masas. Mexico City: Debolsillo.Google Scholar
Eisner, Will 2008 Comics and Sequential Art: Principles and Practices from the Legendary Cartoonist. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1916 Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1928) 2002 “El humor.” In Obras completas de Sigmund Freud. Translated by Luis López-Ballesteros y de Torres, 2nd ed. Argentina: Ediciones Nueva Hélade. (Freud Total 2.0, CD-ROM.)Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1995 “Constructing Social Protest.” In Social Movements and Culture, edited by Johnston, Hank and Klandermans, Bert, 85–106. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Gasca, Luis, and Gubern, Román 2001 El discurso del cómic. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gollás, Manuel 2004 “Breve relato de cincuenta años de política económica.” In Una historia contemporánea de México, Vol. 1, Transformaciones y permanencias, edited by Bizberg, Ilán, Meyer, Lorenzo, Alba, Francisco, 223–312. Mexico City: Océano.Google Scholar
Gracida Romo, Elsa 2002 El siglo XX mexicano: Un capítulo de su historia, 1940-1982. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Trevor 1976 Comedians. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Gubern, Román 1981 El lenguaje de los comics. 4th ed. Barcelona: Península.Google Scholar
Guigni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles, eds. 1999 How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, Harold E. Jr., and Tatum, Charles M. 1992 Not Just for Children: The Mexican Comic Book in the late 1960s and 1970s. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Hughes, Sallie 2006 Newsrooms in Conflict: Journalism and the Democratization of Mexico. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Scott A., and Benford, Robert D. 2004 “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 433–458. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnston, Hank 1995 “A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schemata.” In Social Movements and Culture, edited by Johnston, Hank and Klandermans, Bert, 217–246. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Hank, and Klandermans, Bert 1995 “The Cultural Analysis of Social Movements.” in Social Movements and Culture, edited by Johnston, Hank and Klandermans, Bert, 3–24. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad 2004 “Gustavo Díaz Ordaz: Las insuficiencias de la presidencia autoritaria.” In Presidentes mexicanos, Tomo II (1911-2000), edited by Fowler, Will, 287–336. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estudios Históricos de la Revolución Mexicana.Google Scholar
Lomnitz, Claudio 2005 Death and the Idea of Mexico. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. 1996 “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes; Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloud, Scott 1993 Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto 1996 Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montemayor, Carlos 2008 “Lo personal y lo real.” Proceso 31, no. 1666, October 5.Google Scholar
Mraz, John 2009 Looking for Mexico: Modern Visual Culture and National Identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muro, Miguel Ángel 2004 Análisis e interpretación del cómic. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.Google Scholar
Neria, Leticia 2012 “Humour as Political Resistance and Social Criticism: Mexican Comics and Cinema, 1969-1976.” PhD diss., University of St Andrews, Scotland. http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/3196.Google Scholar
Nolan García, Kimberly A. 2011 “Transnational Advocates and Labor Rights Enforcement in the North American Free Trade Agreement.” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (2): 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirandello, Luigi 2002 “Esencia, caracteres y materia del humorismo.” Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación 7:95–130.Google Scholar
Pitol, Sergio 2010 “Borola contra el mundo.” La Jornada, May 26. www.jornada.unam.mx/2010/05/26/opinion/a06alcul.Google Scholar
Poniatowska, Elena 2006 Fuerte es el silencio. Mexico: Era.Google Scholar
Purdie, Susan 1993 Comedy: The Mastery of Discourse. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor 1984 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, Anne 2004 Del “Pepín” a “Los Agachados”: Cómics y censura en el México posrevolucionario. Translated by Schussheim, Victoria. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Saraceni, Mario 2003 The Language of Comics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scherer, Julio 1986 Los presidentes. Mexico City: Debolsillo.Google Scholar
Speck, Paula K. 1982 “Rius for Beginners: A Study in Comic Book Satire.” Studies in Latin American Popular Culture 1:113–124.Google Scholar
Tello, Carlos 1993 La política económica en México, 1970-1976. 11th ed. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 2004 Social Movements, 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney 2007 Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Torres, Jorge 2008 Nazar, la historia secreta. El hombre detrás de la guerra sucia. Mexico City: Debate.Google Scholar
Zupancic, Alenka 2006 “The Concrete Universal, and What Comedy Can Tell Us About It.” In Lacan: The Silent Partners, edited by Žižek, Slavoj, 171–197. London: Verso.Google Scholar