Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:51:49.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poststructural Sand Castles in Latin American Postcolonial Theory Today

Review products

LATIN AMERICANISM. By CampaRomán De la. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. Pp. 223. $18.95 paper.)
MODERNISMO, MODERNITY, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPANISH AMERICAN LITERATURE. By JradeCathy L. (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998. Pp. 293. $30.00 cloth, $15.95 paper.)
LOCAL HISTORIES/GLOBAL DESIGNS: COLONIALITY, SUBALTERN KNOWLEDGES, AND BORDER THINKING. By MignoloWalter D. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000. Pp. 371. $19.95 paper.)

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Frederick Luis Aldama
Frederick Luis Aldama*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , 2002 , pp. 201 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by the University of Texas Press

References

1. See the initial formulation of this theory in Mohanty's, “The Epistemic Status of Cultural Identity: On Beloved and the Postcolonial Condition,” Cultural Critique 24 (1993):41-80.

2. The storytelling form of magical realism epitomizes this erasing of difference. Postcolonial theorists criticize poststructuralists for identifying magical realism as paradigmatic—or what counts as ethnically authentic—of third world literary production and epistemology. See Gayatri Spivak's essay, “Postructuralism, Marginality, Postcoloniality, and Value,” in Literary Theory Today, edited by Peter Collier (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990). See also my forthcoming book Rebellious Mimetics.

3. This practice recalls the Modernistas, who secured their incomes as journalists, civil servants, ambassadors, or lower-ranking diplomats while using esoteric beliefs as a critique and system of counter-knowledge to imperialist materialism and technology.

4. Steve Woolgar, “On the Alleged Distinction between Discourse and Praxis.” Social Studies of Science 16 (1986):309-17.