Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:36:14.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Television and Neopopulism in Latin America: Media Effects in Brazil and Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Taylor C. Boas
Taylor C. Boas*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several Latin American countries have experienced the emergence of neopopulist politicians who eschew ties to traditional parties and orient their campaigns toward the atomized poor. This article examines the role of television in the electoral success of these politicians. Using survey data, I assess the impact of television exposure on vote choice in the 1989 election of Fernando Collor de Mello in Brazil, the 2000 election of Alberto Fujimori in Peru, and the 2001 election of Alejandro Toledo in Peru. These cases achieve variation on two predictors of media effects: the presence of a neopopulist outsider and biased television coverage of the campaign. Statistical analysis confirms our theoretical expectations of media effects in the first two elections (where coverage was biased) but not in the third. These findings suggest that bias is the more reliable predictor of television's impact on Latin American presidential elections, rather than the presence of a neopopulist candidate.

Resumen

Resumen

Varios países latinoamericanos han experimentado el surgimiento de políticos neopopulistas que evaden conexión alguna con los partidos tradicionales y orientan sus campañas hacia poblaciones pobres, no organizadas. Este artículo examina el rol de la televisión en el éxito electoral de dichos políticos. En base a resultados de encuestas se determina el efecto de la cobertura televisiva en la definición del voto en la elección de Fernando Collor de Mello en Brasil en 1989, Alberto Fujimori en Perú en 2000, y Alejandro Toledo en Perú en 2001. Estos casos varían con respecto a dos variables indicativas de efectos mediáticos: la presencia de un candidato neopopulista independiente y una cobertura televisiva sesgada de la campaña electoral. Análisis estadísticos confirman las expectativas teóricas sobre efectos mediáticos en las dos primeras elecciones, donde la cobertura fue sesgada, pero no en la tercera. Este hallazgo sugiere que la cobertura sesgada, y no la presencia de un candidato neopopulista, es la variable indicativa más confiable de un efecto televisivo en las elecciones presidenciales latinoamericanas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 27 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

I am particularly grateful to Ruth Berins Collier for multiple rounds of comments on earlier versions of this article. Others who provided helpful feedback include David Collier, Chappell Lawson, Mary Sprague, Laura Stoker, participants in the University of California, Berkeley Latin American politics research seminar, and three anonymous LARR reviewers. Acquisition of data was facilitated by Sandro Macassi of the Asociación de Comunicadores Sociales Calandria and Patricia Zarate of the Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (both in Lima, Peru) and the CIRELA Project and UCDATA at the University of California, Berkeley. The research for this article was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan 1998 “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. 1954 Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1960 The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel 1997 The Power of Identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Centre for the Study of Democracy 2000 “Television Coverage of Presidential Candidates: The Third Transparencia Survey.” Queens University, Canada. <http://qsilver.queensu.ca/csd/peru2000/press/special6.shtml>>Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H., and Hochheimer, John L. 1982 “The Beginnings of Political Communication Research in the United States: Origins of the ‘Limited Effects’ Model.” In The Media Revolution in America and Western Europe, edited by Rogers, Everett M. and Balle, Francis, 267–96. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
CIRELA (Comparative Infrastructure of Representation in Latin America) 2004 “Media in Peru.” Unpublished manuscript. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins 2001 “Populism.” In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B., 11813–16. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine 2002 “Cashing in on Authoritarianism: Media Collusion in Fujimori's Peru.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7 (1): 115–25.Google Scholar
Conti, Mario Sergio 1999 Notícias do Planalto: A imprensa e Fernando Collor. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Fowks, Jacqueline 2000 Suma y resta de la realidad: Medios de comunicación y elecciones generales 2000 en el Perú. Lima: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 1992 “Conservative Electoral Movements and Democratic Politics: Core Constituencies, Coalition Building, and the Latin American Electoral Right.” In The Right and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Chalmers, Douglass A., Maria do Larmo Campello de Souza, and Boron, Atilio, 13–42. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2003 Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kenney, Charles D. 2003 “The Death and Rebirth of a Party System, Peru 1978–2001.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (10): 1210–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Chappell H. 1999 “Why Cardenas Won: The 1997 Elections in Mexico City.” In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, and Public Opinion, edited by Jorge I. Domínguez and Poiré, Alejandro, 147–73. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell H. 2002 Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell H. 2004 “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign.” In Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000, edited by Jorge I. Domínguez, and Lawson, Chappell, 187–210. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell, and McCann, James A. 2005 “Television News, Mexico's 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel 1948 The People's Choice. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 1999 “Fujimori and Post-Party Politics in Peru.” Journal of Democracy 10 (3): 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Cameron, Maxwell A. 2003 “Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori's Peru.” Latin American Politics and Society 45 (3): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Venicio A. de 1990 “Televisão e política: Hipótese sobre a eleição presidencial de 1989.” Comunicação e Política 9 (11): 29–54.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott 1997 Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R. 1995 “Conclusion: Parties and Democracy in Latin America—Different Patterns, Common Challenges.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 459–76. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moisés, José Alvaro 1993 “Elections, Political Parties and Political Culture in Brazil: Changes and Continuities.” Journal of Latin American Studies 25: 575–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro 1999 “Campaign Awareness and Voting in the 1997 Mexican Congressional Elections.” In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, and Public Opinion, edited by Jorge I. Domínguez and Poiré, Alejandro, 114–46. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nájar, Rosario 1999 “Aproximación cuantitativa a la problemática de los medios de comunicación en el Perú.” In Cultura y globalización, edited by Carlos Iván Degregori and Portocarrero, Gonzalo, 359–84. Lima: Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1994 “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostiguy, Pierre 1997 “Peronismo y antiperonismo: Bases socioculturales de la identidad política en la Argentina.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales 6: 133–213.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E., and McClure, Robert 1976 The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro 1999 “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994.” In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, and Public Opinion, edited by Jorge I. Domínguez and Poiré, Alejandro, 24–56. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porto, Mauro P. 2003 “Mass Media and Politics in Democratic Brazil.” In Brazil Since 1985: Politics, Economy, and Society, edited by Maria D'Alva Kinzo and Dunkerly, James, 288–314. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995 “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case.” World Politics 48 (1): 82–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubim, Rubim Antonio Albino 1989 “Comunicação, espaço público e eleições presidenciais.” Comunicação e política 9 (2–4): 7–21.Google Scholar
Sanborn, Cynthia, and Panfichi, Aldo 1996 “Fujimori y las raíces del neopopulismo.” In Los enigmas del poder: Fujimori 1990–1996, edited by Fernando Tuesta Soldevilla, 29–52. Lima: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni 1997 Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross 1991 “Brazil under Collor: Anatomy of a Crisis.” World Policy Journal 8 (2): 321–47.Google Scholar
Silva, Carlos Eduardo Lins da 1993 “The Brazilian Case: Manipulation by the Media?” In Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America, edited by Skidmore, Thomas E., 137–44. Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, MD: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Straubhaar, Joseph, Olsen, Organ, and Nunes, Maria Cavaliari 1993 “The Brazilian Case: Influencing the Voter.” In Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America, edited by Skidmore, Thomas E., 118–36. Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, Md.: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka Gondo, Martín, and Ardela, Patrícia Zárate 2002 “Valores democráticos y participación ciudadana en el Perú 1998–2001.” Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Torre, Torre Carlos de 2000 Populist Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience. Athens, OH: Center for International Studies, Ohio University.Google Scholar
Transparencia 1999 “Octubre: Seguimiento a los posibles candidadatos en la televisión.” Datos Electorales 10. www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2000/datos/datos10.pdf.Google Scholar
Transparencia 2000a “Los candidatos presidenciales en la TV de señal abierta.” Datos Electorales 29. <www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2000/datos/datos29.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Transparencia 2000b “Los nueve candidatos en los noticieros nocturnos de la televisión de señal abierta.” Datos Electorales 26. <www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2000/datos/datos26.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Transparencia 2000c “Los nueve candidatos presidenciales en la televisión.” Datos Electorales 21. <http://www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2000/datos/datos21.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Transparencia 2001a “Informe de monitoreo de medios, Enero 2001.” <http://www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2001/monitoreo/monitoreo_ene.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Transparencia 2001b “Informe de monitoreo de medios, Febrero 2001.” <http://www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2001/monitoreo/monitoreo_feb.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Transparencia 2001c “Informe de monitoreo de medios, Marzo 2001.” <http://www.transparencia.org.pe/ele2001/monitoreo/monitoreo_mar.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio 2003 “Media Populism: Neo-Populism in Latin America.” In The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis, edited by Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, Stewart, Julianne, and Horsefield, Bruce, 197–216. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt 1993 “The Rise and Fall of President Collor and Its Impact on Brazilian Democracy.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 35 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt 1996 “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (3): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt 2001 “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank 2003 World Development Indicators. <http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/>..>Google Scholar
Zaller, John 1996 “The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, edited by Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A., 17–78. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar