Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:31:24.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Unevenness of Democracy at the Subnational Level: Provincial Closed Games in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Jacqueline Behrend
Jacqueline Behrend*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de San Martín and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Democratization studies initially focused on processes at the national level, but in recent years, there has been a growing interest in the spatially uneven nature of democracy at, the subnational level This article draws on examples from Argentina and develops an analytical framework of closed games to analyze the functioning of subnational democracy. It argues that the less democratic provinces or states of nationally democratic countries are not necessarily authoritarian and that the concept of subnational authoritarianism prevents us from seeing political dynamics that may arise in the context of a reasonably well-functioning electoral democracy and may result in subnational closed games. The article takes into account the role of political families, media ownership, control of access to business opportunities, and control of the provincial state.

Resumen

Resumen

Los estudios sobre la democratización inicialmente se centraron en los procesos a nivel nacional, pero en los últimos años, ha habido un mayor interés en la naturaleza espacialmente despareja de la democracia a nivel subnacional. Este trabajo se basa en ejemplos de la Argentina y desarrolla el marco analítico del juego cerrado para analizar el funcionamiento de la democracia subnacional. Argumenta que las provincias o estados menos democráticos en países democráticos a nivel nacional no son necesariamente autoritarios y que el concepto de autoritarismo subnacional no nos permite ver las dinámicas políticas que pueden surgir en el contexto de una democracia electoral que funciona razonablemente bien y que puede resultar en juegos cerrados a nivel subnacional. El trabajo toma en cuenta el rol de las familias políticas, la propiedad de los medios de comunicación, el control del acceso a oportunidades de negocios y el control del estado provincial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , 2011 , pp. 150 - 176
Copyright
Copyright ©2011 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

This article is based on my doctoral dissertation at the University of Oxford (2008). It is also part of a broader research project on subnational democratization in comparative perspective funded by a Mellon-Latin American Studies Association grant. I am very grateful to Laurence Whitehead for his encouragement, support, and insightful comments. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the International Political Science Association Congress in Santiago, Chile, July 12–16, 2009, and at the seminar “Nuevos estudios sobre el federalismo argentino,” Buenos Aires, Universidad Torcuato Di Telia, November 2009, where I received very helpful comments. I thank André Borges, Marcelo Leiras, Lorena Moscovich, Catalina Smulovitz, and Juan Carlos Torre for comments on earlier versions, and the three anonymous LARR reviewers for their helpful feedback.

References

Arias, María Luisa 1998 “El Diario de San Luis: Una lectura desde Bourdieu.” Kairós 2 (2), http://www.revistakairos.org/k02-02.htm.Google Scholar
Balmori, Diana, Voss, Stuart, and Wortman, Miles 1984 Notable Family Networks in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Behrend, Jacqueline 2006 “Mobilization and Accountability: A Study of Social Control in the ‘Cabezas’ Case in Argentina.” In Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies, edited by Peruzzotti, Enrique and Smulovitz, Catalina, 213–245. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrend, Jacqueline 2008 “Democratic Argentina and the‘Closed Game’ of Provincial Politics: Protest and Persistence.” D.Phil. thesis, Department of Politics and International Relations, Oxford University, U.K.Google Scholar
Benton, Allyson Forthcoming “Bottom-Up Challenges to National Democracy: Latin America's (Legal) Subnational Authoritarian Enclaves, the Case of Mexico.” Comparative Politics.Google Scholar
Bill Chávez, Rebecca 2003 “The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: A Tale of Two Provinces.” Comparative Politics 35 (4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, André 2007 “Rethinking State Politics: The Withering of State Dominant Machines in Brazil.” Brazilian Political Science Review, 1 (2): 108–156.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Escolar, Marcelo 2005 La nueva política de partidos en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Micozzi, Juan Pablo 2005 “The Governor's Backyard: A Seat-Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races.” Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1060–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales 2002 Informe Anual 2002. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales. Available at http://www.cels.org.ar/Site_cels/publicaciones/informes_pdf/2002_Capitulo3.pdf.Google Scholar
Cieza, Daniel, Menéndez, Néstor, and Aragón, Estela 2005 “La crisis del poder judicial de San Luis: Aportes para un debate.” Buenos Aires: Observatorio de Derechos Humanos de San Luis.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven 1997 “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49 (3): 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1999 “Subnational Politics and Democratization: Tensions between Center and Periphery in the Mexican Political System.” In Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico, edited by Cornelius, Wayne A., Eisenstadt, Todd A., and Hindley, Jane, 3–16. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry 2002 “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durazo Herrmann, Julián 2009 “Neo-patrimonialism and Subnational Authoritarianism in Mexico: The Case of Oaxaca.” Presentation delivered at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Rio de Janeiro, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel 1973 Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrimonialism. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
El Litoral 1992 “Solicitada.” October 25.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos 2009 “Measuring Variance in Subnational Regimes: Results from an Expert-based Operationalization of Democracy in the Argentine Provinces.” Presentation delivered at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos 2010 “A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes. Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces.” World Politics 62 (2): 302–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 2005 “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics 58 (1): 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 2009 “Subnational Authoritarianism and Territorial Politics: Charting the Theoretical Landscape.” Presentation delivered at the IPSA World Congress. Santiago, Chile, July 12–16.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L., and Calvo, Ernesto 2000 “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (3): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward L., and Cao, Julieta Suárez Forthcoming “Federalized Party Systems and Subnational Party Competition: Theory and Empirical Application to Argentina.” Comparative Politics 43 (1).Google Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina 2009 “Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity after Democratization: Argentina and Mexico in Comparative Perspective.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Guiñazú, María Clelia 2003 “The Subnational Politics of Structural Adjustment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances 1996 Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan 1994 “Crisis-Ridden Elections (Again) in the Dominican Republic: Neopatrimonialism, Presidentialism, and Weak Electoral Oversight.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36 (4): 91–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaime, Juan Cruz 2002 Corrientes: Poder y aristocracia. Buenos Aires: Letemendía.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., and Hwang, Wonjae 2005 “Provincial Party Bosses: Keystone of the Argentine Congress.” In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, edited by Levitsky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, 115–138. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn 1995 “The Hybrid Regimes of Central America.” Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A. 2002 “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerio de Economía, Dirección de Gastos Sociales Consolidados 2000 “Evaluación del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda.” Available at http://www.mecon.gov.ar/peconomica/basehome/fonavi.pdf.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred 2007 “Uneven Democracy? Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Brazil.” Presentation delivered at the Latin American Studies Association Conference, Montréal, Canada, September 5–8.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred 2009 “A Reversal of Political Fortune: The Transitional Dynamics of Conservative Rule in Brazil.” Presentation delivered at the Latin American Studies Association Conference, Rio de Janeiro, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo 2009 “Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion?” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Urbano J. 1980 Historia de San Luis. Buenos Aires: Plus Ultra.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1993 “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development 21 (8): 1355–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1999 “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America : A Partial Conclusion.” In The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, edited by Méndez, Juan E., O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Pinheiro, Paulo Sérgio, 303–337. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe 1986 Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Rozas, Victoria 2009 “La democracia en sus dimensiones territoriales: El caso de Santiago del Estero.” Presentation delivered at the seminar “Nuevos estudios sobre el federalismo argentino,” Buenos Aires, Universidad Torcuato di Telia, November 4.Google Scholar
Perfil 2009 “Cosas de familia. Corrientes: la curiosa pelea electoral por la gobernación.” July 17.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni 1976 Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2006 Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard 2001 “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, Celina 2009 “Subnational Authoritarian Politics and Policy Choices in the Brazilian State of Bahia.” Presentation delivered at the Twenty-first International Political Science Association World Congress of Political Science, Santiago, Chile, July 12–16.Google Scholar
Trocello, Gloria 2008 La manufactura de “ciudadanos siervos”: Cultura política y regímenes neopatrimonialistas. San Luis, Argentina: Nueva Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Universidad Nacional del Nordeste 2000 Análisis de los factores intervinientes en la crisis del estado en la provincia de Corrientes. Corrientes: Universidad Nacional del Nordeste.Google Scholar
UN Development Programme 2005 Human Development Report 2005. Buenos Aires: UN Development Programme.Google Scholar
Vilas, Carlos M. 1992 “Family Affairs: Class, Lineage and Politics in Contemporary Nicaragua.” Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (2): 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence 2002 Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiñazki, Miguel 2002 El Adolfo. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar