We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
References
American Bar Association Special Committee on Criminal Justice in a Free Society (American Bar Association). 1988. Criminal Justice in Crisis. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W.1984. Bright Line Fever and the Fourth Amendment. University of Pittsburgh Law Review45:227–288.Google Scholar
1996. A Peculiar Privilege in Historical Perspective: The Right to Remain Silent. Michigan Law Review94: 2625–2672.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony G.1974. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review58:349–477.Google Scholar
Austin American Statesman.1998. Parole, Probation Rolls Hit Record, 17 August, p. A2. From U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Baldus, David, and Woodworth, George. 1998. The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides. Washington, D.C.: Death Penalty Information Center.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan. 1998. “We the People” and Our Enduring Values. Michigan Law Review96:1376–1420.Google Scholar
Bast, Carol M.1997. Driving While Black: Stopping Motorists on a Subterfuge. Criminal Law Bulletin33:457–486.Google Scholar
Beale, Sarah Sun. 1995. Too Many and Yet Too Few: New Principles to Define the Proper Limits for Federal Criminal Jurisdiction. Hastings Law Journal46:979–1018.Google Scholar
Beatty, Michael L.1981. The Ability to Suppress Exculpatory Evidence: Let's Cut Off the Prosecutor's Hands. Idaho Law Review17:237–28.Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugh Adam, and Michael, L. Radelet. 1987. Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases. Stanford Law Review40:21–179.Google Scholar
Bochard, Edward. 1932. Convicting the Innocent. Garden City, N.Y.: Garden City Publishing.Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig M.1993. The Court's “Two Model” Approach to the Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem!Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology84:429–461.Google Scholar
Brand-Williams, Oralandar. 1998. Eastpointe Cops Accused of Bias: Black Bike Riders are Stopped Because of Their Race, Suit Says. Detroit News, 1 July, p. A1.Google Scholar
Braun, Gerry. 1998. Election'98 Governor Debate Analysis: Davis, Lungren in Sharp Contrast. San Diego Union-Tribune, 1 August, p. A1.Google Scholar
Brazil, Jeff, and Berry, Steve. 1992. Color of Driver Is Key to Stops in 1–95 Videos. Orlando Sentinel, 23 August, p. A1.Google Scholar
Brigham, John C., and Robert, K. Brothwell. 1983. The Ability of Prospective Jurors to Estimate the Accuracy of Eyewitness Identification. Law and Human Behavior7:19–30.Google Scholar
Capra, Daniel J.1984. Access to Exculpatory Evidence: Avoiding the Agurs Problems of Prosecutorial Discretion and Retrospective Review. Fordham Law Review53:391–448.Google Scholar
Clifford, Brian R. and Clive, R. Hollin. 1981. Effects of the Type of Incident and the Number of Perpetrators on Eyewitness Memory. Journal of Applied Psychology66:364–70.Google Scholar
Cloud, Morgan. 1996. Searching through History; Searching for History. University of Chicago Law Review63:1707–47.Google Scholar
Cohen, Adam. 1999. The Frame Game. Time, 29 March, pp. 54–56.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sharon. 1996. “Ringmasters” Unlock Truth, Free Man Who Confessed to Murder. L. A. Times, 31 March, p. A2.Google Scholar
Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., and McEwen, T.1996. Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence after Trial. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Cutler, Brian L., Steven Penrod, D., and Red Dexter, Hedy. 1990. Jury Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence. Law and Human Behavior14:185–91.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas Y.1974. On the Limitations of Empirical Evaluations of the Exclusionary Rule: A Critique of the Spiotto Research andUnited States v. Calandra. Northwestern University Law Review69:740–98.Google Scholar
1983. A Hard Look at What We Know (and Still Need to Learn) About the “Costs” of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of “Lost” Arrests. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 611–90.Google Scholar
1999. The Original Meaning of “Unreasonable” in “Unreasonable Search and Seizures”: Recovering the Authentic Historical Fourth Amendment by Avoiding Prochronistic Assumptions. University of Michigan Law Review. In press.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela J.1997. Race, Cops, and Traffic Stops. University of Miami Law Review51:425–43.Google Scholar
Dripps, Donald. 1996. Akhil Amar on Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Law: “Here I Go Down that Wrong Road Again. North Carolina Law Review74:1559–639.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1998. Getting Away with Murder: How Politics Is Destroying the Criminal Justice System. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigations. 1996. Crime in the United States: Uniform Crime Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Bureau of Investigations.Google Scholar
Fisher, Stanley Z.1993. Just the Facts, Ma'am: Lying and the Omission of Exculpatory Evidence in Police Reports. New England Law Review28:1–62.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Michael A.1996. Driven to Extremes. Washington Post, 29 March, p. A1.Google Scholar
Friendly, Henry J.1968. The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change. University of Cincinnati Law Review37:671–726.Google Scholar
Gershman, Bennett L.1992. The New Prosecutors. University of Pittsburgh Law Review54:393–458.Google Scholar
Gerstein, Robert S.1970Privacy and Self-Incrimination. Ethics80:87–101.Google Scholar
Givelber, Daniel. 1997. Meaningless Acquittals, Meaningful Convictions: Do We Reliably Acquit the InnocentRutgers Law Review49:1317–96.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, Gisli H.1992. The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions, and Testimony. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger B.1995. Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification: A New Pair of Glasses for the Jury. American Criminal Law Review32:1013–64.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mark. 1998. Why Are Iowa's Babies Dying ABA Journal, August, p. 74.Google Scholar
Harris, David A.1994. Factors for Reasonable Suspicion: When Black and Poor Means Stopped and Frisked. Indiana Law Journal69:659–88.Google Scholar
Higgins, Michael. 1999. Tough Luck for the Innocent Man. ABA Journal, March, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, Michael H.1989. Requiring Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification Evidence at Federal Criminal Trials. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology80:585–672.Google Scholar
Huff, Ronald A. C., Rattner, Arye, and Sagarin, Edward. 1996. Convicted But Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, Sheri L.1983. Race and the Decision to Detain a Suspect. Yale Law Journal93:214–258.Google Scholar
1984. Cross-Racial Identification Errors in Criminal Cases. Cornell Law Review69:934–87.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale. 1995. On the “Fruits” of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, and Compelled Testimony. Michigan Law Review93:929–1010.Google Scholar
King, Nancy J.1995. Portioning Punishment: Constitutional Limits on Successive and Excessive Penalties. University of Pennsylvania Law Review144:101–96.Google Scholar
Klein, Richard, and Spangenberg, Robert. 1993. The Indigent Defense Crisis. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Klein, Susan R.1994. Miranda Deconstitutionalized: When the Self-Incrimination Clause and the Civil Rights Act Collide. University of Pennsylvania Law Review143:417–489.Google Scholar
1996. Civil In Rem Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy. Iowa Law Review82:183–274.Google Scholar
1999. Redrawing the Criminal-Civil Boundary. Buffalo Criminal Law Review2:26 (in press).Google Scholar
Klein, Susan R., and Chiarello, Katherine. 1998. Successive Prosecutions and Compound Criminal Statutes: A Functional Test. Texas Law Review77:333–401.Google Scholar
Kubie, Lawrence S.1959. Implications for Legal Procedure of the Fallibility of Human Memory. University of Pennsylvania Law Review108:59–75.Google Scholar
LaFave, Wayne R.1982. The Fourth Amendment in an Imperfect World: On Drawing “Bright Lines” and “Good Faith. University of Pittsburgh Law Review43:307–61.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J., and Lovin Tapp, June. 1973. The Psychology of Criminal Identification: The Gap from Wade to Kirby. University of Pennsylvania Law Review121:1079–131.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W.1968. The Origins of the Fifth Amendment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, Elizabeth F.1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1986. Ten Years in the Life of an Expert Witness. Law and Human Behavior10:241–63.Google Scholar
1988. Powerful Eyewitness Testimony: Lessons From the Research. Trial24:64–66.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1988. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maclin, Tracey. 1994. When the Cure for the Fourth Amendment Is Worse than the Disease. Southern California Law Review68:1–72.Google Scholar
1997. The Complexity of the Fourth Amendment: A Historical Review. Boston University Law Review77:925–74.Google Scholar
Mann, Kenneth. 1992. Punitive Civil Sanctions: The Middleground Between Criminal and Civil Law. Yale Law Journal101:1795–873.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc, and Huling, Tracy. 1995. Young Black Americans and the Criminal Justice System: Five Years Later. Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Profect.Google Scholar
Mclntyre, Lisa J.1987. The Public Defender: The Practice of Law in the Shadows of Repute. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McMunigal, Kevin C.1989. Disclosure and Accuracy in the Guilty Plea Process. Hastings Law Journal40:957–1029.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Daniel J.1988. Deterring Constitutional Violations by Law Enforcement Officials: Plaintiffs and Defendants as Private Attorneys General. Columbia Law Review88:247–328.Google Scholar
Middlekauff, W. M. Bradford. 1994. What Practitioners Say About Broad Criminal Discovery Practice, More Just–or Just More DangerousCriminal Justice9:14.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F.1983. The Societal Cost of the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Assessment, American Bar Foundation Research Journal585–609.Google Scholar
National Center on Institutions and Alternatives. 1992. Hobbling a Generation: Young African American Males in the Criminal Justice System of America's Cities. Baltimore, Maryland: National Center on Institutions and Alternatives.Google Scholar
Office of Legal Policy. 1989. Report to the Attorney General on the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule. U.S. Department of Justice, Truth in Criminal Justice Series, Report No. 2, 1986. Reprint, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform22:573–82.Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J.1987. Are Confessions Really Good for the Soul? A Proposal to Mirandize Miranda. Harvard Law Review100:1826–45.Google Scholar
Orfield, Myron W.Jr.1987. The Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence: An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers. University of Chicago Law Review54:1016–55.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 1997. Dirty Harry and the Real Constitution. University of Chicago Law Review64:1457–91.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.1981. Rethinking the Fourth Amendment. Supreme Court Review49–80.Google Scholar
Precious, Tom. 1998. Assemblymen Meet to Approve “Jenna's Law” Measure Aimed at Making More Certain Length of Sentences for Violent Offenses. Buffalo News, 30 July, p. A5.Google Scholar
Rosen, Richard A.1987. Disciplinary Sanctions Against Prosecutors for Brady Violations: A Paper Tiger. North Carolina Law Review65:693–744.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Benjamin E.199091. Rethinking the Right to Due Process in Connection with Pretrial Identification Procedures: An Analysis and a Proposal. Kentucky Law Journal79:259–316.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter. 1983. Suing Government. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J.1984. Is Plea Bargaining InevitableHarvard Law Review97:1037–107.Google Scholar
1992. Plea Bargaining as Disaster. Yale Law Journal101:1979–2009.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 1995. The Problems with Privacy's Problem. Michigan Law Review93:1079–101.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Lee. 1981. Disclosure to the Guilty Pleading Defendant; Brady v. Maryland and the Brady Trilogy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology72:165–203.Google Scholar
Sklansky, David. 1995. Cocaine, Race, and Equal Protection. Stanford Law Review47:1283–322.Google Scholar
1997. Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment. 1997 Supreme Court Review271–329.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H.1982. Deception by Police. Criminal Justice Ethics1(summer/fall):40–54.Google Scholar
Slobogin, Christopher, and Schumacher, Joseph E.1993. Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Autonomy in Fourth Amendment Cases: An Empirical Look at “Understandings Recognized and Permitted by Society. Duke Law Journal42:727–75.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark M.1979. Damages or Nothing–The Efficacy of the Bivens-Type Remedy. Cornell Law Review64:667–703.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol. 1994. Second Thoughts About First Principles. Harvard Law Review107:820–57.Google Scholar
Stuntz, William J.1995. Privacy's Problem and the Law of Criminal Procedure. Michigan Law Review93:1016–78.Google Scholar
1997. The Uneasy Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Justice. Yale Law Journal107:1–76.Google Scholar
Sundby, Scott. 1994. Everyman's Fourth Amendment: Privacy or Mutual Trust Between Government and CitizenColumbia Law Review94:1751–1812.Google Scholar
Taylor, Telford. 1969. Two Studies in Constitutional Interpretation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Tillman, Robert. 1987. The Size of the “Criminal Population,” The Prevalence and Incidents of Adult Arrests. Criminology25:561–79.Google Scholar
Natta, Van, Don, Jr.1996. Judge Baer Takes Himself Off Drug Case. New York Times, 17 May, p. B1.Google Scholar
Wells, Gary L., Ferguson, Tamara, Lindsay, R. C.1981. The Tractability of Eyewitness Confidence and Its Implications for Triers of Fact. Journal of Applied Psychology66:688–96.Google Scholar
Westley, William A.1970. Violence and the Police: A Sociological Study of Law, Custom, and Morality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Westling, Wayne. 1992. The Case for Expert Witness Assistance to the Jury in Eyewitness Identification Cases. Oregon Law Review71:93–126.Google Scholar
White, Welsh W.1997. False Confessions and the Constitution: Safeguards Against Untrustworthy Confessions. Harvard civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review32:105–57.Google Scholar