Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:51:48.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preferences for Law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Frederick Schauer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Winter 2017 , pp. 87 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Axelrod, Robert. 1981. The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists. American Political Science Review 75 (2): 306–18.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Beltran, Jordi Ferrer, and Giovanni, Battista Ratti, eds. 2012. The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
d'Almeida, Luis Duarte. 2015. Allowing for Exceptions: A Theory of Defences and Defeasibility in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert. 1994. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert. 2016. Forceful Self‐Help and Private Voice: How Schauer and McAdams Exaggerate a State's Ability to Monopolize Violence and Expression. Law & Social Inquiry 42:49–59.Google Scholar
Fischman, Joshua. B. 2014. Do the Justices Vote Like Policy Makers? Evidence from Scaling the Supreme Court with Interest Groups. Journal of Legal Studies 44:S269–293.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack. 2009. The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. 2016. The Problem of Social Order: What Should We Count as Law? Law & Social Inquiry 42:16–27.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. [1961] 2012. The Concept of Law, 3rd ed., ed. Bulloch, Penelope A., Raz, Joseph, and Green, Leslie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 2017. Democracy, Law, Compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 42:6–15.Google Scholar
Kar, Robin Bradley. 2017. The Evolutionary Game‐Theoretic Foundations of Law. Law & Social Inquiry 42:38–48.Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl. 2017. The Inevitability and Indeterminacy of Game‐Theoretic Accounts of Legal Order. Law & Social Inquiry 42:28–37.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 2015. The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Minda, John Paul, and David Smith, J. 2001. Prototypes in Category Learning: The Effect of Category Size, Category Structure, and Stimulus Complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 27 (3): 775–99.Google Scholar
Nadler, Janice. 2017. Expressive Law, Social Norms, and Social Groups. Law & Social Inquiry 42:60–75.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:137–58.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 1989. Authority and Value: Reflections on Raz's Morality of Freedom . Southern California Law Review 62:995–1095.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 1990. Reasons, Authority, and the Meaning of “Obey”: Further Thoughts on Raz and Obedience to Law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 3 (1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Yasuaki, and Love, Bradley C. 2013. Category Structure and Recognition Memory. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society, part 2, ed. Alterman, Richard and Kirsch, David, 1017–22. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2003. Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2010. When and How (If at All) Does Law Constrain Official Action? Georgia Law Review 44:769–801.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2012a. The Political Risks (If Any) of Breaking the Law. Journal of Legal Analysis 4:83–101.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2012b. On the Nature of the Nature of Law. Archiv für Rechts‐ und Sozialphilosophie 98:457–67.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2015. The Force of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. [1849] 1980 . On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. In Walden and “Civil Disobedience.” New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Ullman‐Margalit, Edna. 1977. The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).Google Scholar
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).Google Scholar